Causes and Implications of Declining Economics Major: A Focus on Australia

Alauddin, Mohammad and Valadkhani, Abbas (2003): Causes and Implications of Declining Economics Major: A Focus on Australia. Published in: Journal of Economic and Social Policy , Vol. 7, No. 2 (2003): pp. 68-90.

Abstract

This paper analyses the causes and implications of declining economics major in Australia. Based on a brief review of the relevant literature and an analysis of the Australian time series data, it is found that economics continues to be less attractive to students in relative terms.

Three major factors contribute to this phenomenon: less than appropriate product for an increasingly diverse clientele, the introduction of more attractive and business, commerce and industry-oriented programs such as finance, accounting and commerce, and business majors geared to the needs of the real world, and the use of less experienced teaching staff in lower undergraduate courses.

It is argued that stemming the tide against the economics discipline would require a significant rethink of development of products more vocational and real world-oriented, market segmentation for different clientele types, and marshalling of more experienced and capable teaching staff for lower undergraduate levels.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Economics discipline, Australia, Universities
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics

References

Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee (AVCC) (1992), Report of the Academic Standards Panel, Economics, Canberra: AGPS.

Abelson, P. (1996), ‘Declining enrolments in economics: Australian experience’, Royal Economic Society Newsletter, 96(1), October, pp.19-20.

Alauddin, M. (1999) ‘Teaching Economics in Changing Environment: A Differentiated Product for a Differential Clientele?’, A Graduate Certificate in Education Project, Brisbane: School of Education, The University of Queensland.

Alauddin, M. and Tisdell, C.A. (2000) 'Changing academic environment and teaching of economics at the university-level: Some critical issues analysed with the help of microeconomics', Economic Papers, 19(1), pp.1-17.

Azzalini, P. and Hopkins, S. (2002) ‘What business students think of economics: Results from a survey of second year students’, Economic Papers, 21(1), pp.11-17.

Becker, W.E. (1997) ‘Teaching economics to undergraduates’, Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3), pp.1347-73.

Becker, W.E. (2000) ‘Teaching economics in the 21st century’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(1), pp.109-19.

Bloch, H. and Stromback, T. (2002) ‘The economics of strategy and the strategy of economics’, Economic Papers, 21(1), pp.1-10.

DeBerry, T.W. (1998), ‘Teaching ‘the dismal science’ by the lecture method: maligned but not abandoned’, International Social Science Review, 73(3-4), pp.6-8.

DEETYA (2001), Higher Education Students Time Series Tables (Canberra: AusInfo, Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

Finegan, T.A. and Siegfried, J. J. (1998), ‘Do introductory economics students learn more if their instructor has a Ph.D’?, American Economist; 42(2), pp.34-46.

Katz, M.L. and Rosen, H.S. (1991) Microeconomics, Homewood, IL and Boston MA: Richard D. Irwin.

Keen, S. (2001) ‘Economics: From emperor to vassal?’, Australian Universities’ Review, pp.15-17.

Keneley, M. and Hellier, P. (2001), A market oriented approach to Australian undergraduate economics education: justification and explanation, Economic Papers, 20(2), pp.81-94.

Keynes, J.M. (1922) “Introduction to the Series” in Money by D.H. Robertson, London: Nisbet and Co. Ltd., pp.v-vii.

Kirman, A. (2001) ‘The teaching of economics: Signes d’Alarme’, Royal Economic Society Newsletter, Issue no. 112, pp.7-8.

Liebenstein, H. (1948) ‘Bandwagon, snob and Veblen effects in the theory of consumer demand’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 62(1), pp.165-201.

Lewis, P. and Norris, K. (1997) ‘Recent changes in economics enrolments’, Economic Papers, 16(1), pp.1-13

Millmow, A. (1995) ‘The market for economists in Australia’, Economic Papers, 14(4), pp.83-96.

Millmow, A. (2000) ‘The state we’re in: University economics 1989/1999’, Economic Papers, 19(4), pp.43-52.

Pindyck, R.S. and Rubinfeld, D.L. (2001) Microeconomics, London and New York: Prentice Hall.

Siegfried, J. J (1998) ‘Trends in undergraduate economics degrees: A 1996-97 update’, Journal of Economic Education, 29(3), pp.285-288.

Siegfried, J. J (2000) ‘Undergraduate economics trends through the 1990s’, Journal of Economic Education, 31(3), pp.296-300.

Siegfried, J. J and Wilkinson, J. T. (1982), ‘The economics curriculum in the United States: 1980’, American-Economic-Review; 72(2), pp.125-38.

Siegfried, J. J. and Scott, C. E. (1994), ‘Recent trends in undergraduate economics degrees’, Journal of Economic Education, 25(3), pp.281-86.

Siegfried, J.J. and Round, D.K. (1994) ‘The Australian undergraduate economics degree: Results from a survey of students’, Economic Record, 70(209), pp.192-203.

Siegfried, J.J. and Round, D.K. (2001), ‘International trends in economics degrees during the 1990s’, Journal of Economic Education, 32(3), pp.203-18.

Tisdell, C.A. (1972), Microeconomics: The Theory of Economic Allocation, Brisbane, Australia: John Wiley and Sons.

Worthington, A.C. and Higgs, H. (2001) ‘Factors explaining the choice of an economics major: The role of student characteristics, personality and perceptions of the profession’, Paper presented at the Eighth Annual Teaching Economics Conference, Melbourne: Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, 8-10 July.