Dinda, Soumyananda (2013): Climate Change Creates Trade Opportunity in India. Forthcoming in: Working Paper at A.K.Dasgupta Centre, Visva Bharati (2013)
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_50636.pdf Download (366kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Climate change is an emerging challenge to developing economy like India however it also creates opportunity to grow through climate friendly goods production and new direction of trade. This paper focuses India’s potential export trade in climate friendly goods. The estimated gravity model is defined as the potential trade and potential trade gap is measured as how well a bilateral trade flow performs relative to the mean as predicted by the model. Potential trade gap means that actual trade is less than predicted trade value. It suggests that there is a scope to increase the export of climate friendly goods (CFG) to trading partners. The total estimated CFG export potential trade gap in India is around 6 billion US dollar (USD) in 2008. This study contributes on the empirical measurement of potential trade of climate friendly goods in India. Paper suggests a possible climate smart export-led growth model in India and mitigates climate change problems.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Climate Change Creates Trade Opportunity in India |
English Title: | Climate Change Creates Trade Opportunity in India |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Bilateral trade flow, Climate friendly goods, Export, Gravity model, Potential Trade, Asia, EU, USA, UK. |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C13 - Estimation: General F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F43 - Economic Growth of Open Economies F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization > F64 - Environment O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth |
Item ID: | 50636 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Soumyananda Dinda |
Date Deposited: | 08 Nov 2013 14:34 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 07:10 |
References: | Anderson, J.E., 1979. ‘A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation’, American Economic Review 69(1):106–16. Anderson, J.E. and van Wincoop, E., 2003. ‘Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle’, American Economic Review 93(1): 170–92. Anderson, J.E. and van Wincoop, E., 2004. ‘Trade Costs’, Journal of Economic Literature 42(3): 691–751. Anderson, M., Ferrantino, M., and Schaeffer, K., 2005. ‘Monte Carlo Appraisals of Gavity Model Specifications’, US International Trade Commission Working Paper 2004–05-A. Baier, Scott L. & Bergstrand, Jeffrey H., 2001. "The growth of world trade: tariffs, transport costs, and income similarity," Journal of International Economics, vol. 53(1): 1-27. Baldwin, R. E. and Taglioni, D., 2006. ‘Gravity for Dummies and Dummies for Gravity Equations’, NBER Working Paper No. W12516. Baldwin, R., 1994. Towards an Integrated Europe, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London. Balistreri, E. J. and Hillberry, R. H., 2006. Trade frictions and welfare in the gravity model: how much of the iceberg melt? Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol.-39: 247 -265. Bergstrand, J.H., 1985. ‘The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence’, Review of Economics and Statistics 67(3): 474–81. Bergstrand, J. H., 1989. ‘The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor–Proportions Theory in International Trade’, Review of Economics and Statistics 71(1):143–53. Cheng, I. H. and Wall, H. J., 2005. ‘Controlling for Heterogeneity in Gravity Models of Trade and Integration’, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 87(1): 49–63. Deardorff, A.V., 1995. ‘Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?’, NBER Working Papers No. 5377. Deardorff, Alan V., 1984. "Testing trade theories and predicting trade flows," in R. W. Jones & P. B. Kenen (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, 1st edition, volume 1, chapter 10, pages 467-517. Dinda, S., 2011a. Trade Opportunities for Climate friendly goods and Technologies in Asia, paper presented at MSM 1st Annual Research Conference Nov 11-12, 2011. Dinda, S., 2011b. Climate Change and Development: Trade Opportunities of Climate Smart Goods and Technologies in Asia, MPRA Paper No. 34883. Drysdale, P., Kalirajan, K.P., Song, L. and Huang, Y., 1997. ‘Trade Among the APEC Economies: An Application of a stochastic varying coefficient gravity model’, Paper presented at 26th Economists Conference, University of Tasmania. Drysdale, P. and Xu, X., 2004. ‘Taiwan’s role in the economic architecture of East Asia and the Pacific’, Pacific Economic Papers No.343. Drysdale, P. and Garnaut, R., 1982. ‘Trade Intensities and the Analysis of Bilateral Trade Flows in a Many-Country World: A Survey’, Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics 22(2): 62–84. Drysdale, P., Huang, Y. and Kalirajan, K.P., 2000. ‘China’s Trade Efficiency: Measurement and Determinants’, in P. Drysdale, Y. Zhang and L. Song (eds), APEC and liberalisation of the Chinese economy, Asia Press, Canberra:259–71. Egger, P., 2002. ‘An Econometric View on the Estimation of Gravity Models and the Calculation of Trade Potentials’, World Economy 25(2): 297–312. Frankel, J. A., Stain, E. and Wei, S. J., 1997. ‘Regional trading blocs in the world economic system’, Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C. Ghosh, S. and Yamarik, S., 2004. ‘Are Regional Trading Arrangements Trade Creating?: An Application of Extreme Bounds Analysis’. Journal of International Economics 63(2):369–395. Guillaume Gaulier, Thierry Mayer and Soledad Zignago, 2004. “Notes on CEPII’s distances measures”, www.cepii.eu. Harrigan, J. 2001. ‘Specialization and the Volume of Trade: Do the Data Obey the Laws?’, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Papers, 8675. Helpman, E., 1987. ‘Imperfect Competition and International Trade: Evidence from Fourteen Industrial Countries’, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 1: 62–81. Helpman, Elhanang; Krugman, Paul R., 1985, “Market Structure and Foreign Trade”, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Jha, V., 2009. “Climate Change, Trade and Production of Renewable Energy Supply Goods: The Need to Level the Playing Field”, ICTSD Paper Kalirajan, K., 1999. ‘Stochastic Varying Coefficients Gravity Model: An Application in Trade Analysis’, Journal of Applied Statistics 26(2):185–93. Kalirajan, K. and Findlay, C., 2005. Estimating Potential Trade Using Gravity Models: A Suggested Methodology, Foundation for Advanced Studies on International Development, Tokyo. Linnemann, H., 1966. An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows, North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam. Martínez–Zarzoso, I. and Nowak–Lehmann, F., 2003. ‘Augmented gravity model: An empirical application to Mercosur– European trade flows’, Journal of Applied Economics 6(002): 291– 316. McCallum, J., 1995. ‘National Borders Matter: Canada–U.S. Regional Trade Patterns’, American Economic Review 85(3): 615–23. Nilsson, L., 2000. ‘Trade integration and the EU economic membership criteria’, European Journal of Political Economy 16: 807–827. Ravallion, M., 2003. ‘On Measuring Aggregate “Social Efficiency”’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3166. Rose, A., 2005. ‘Which International Institutions Promote International Trade?’, Review of International Economics 13(4): 682–98. Rose, A.K., 2004. ‘Do We Really Know That the WTO Increases Trade?’, American Economic Review 94(1): 98–114. Tinbergen, J., 1962. Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy, The Twentieth Century Fund, New York. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/50636 |