de Gorter, Harry and Just, David R. (2007): The Welfare Economics of an Excise-Tax Exemption for Biofuels.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_5151.pdf Download (522kB) | Preview |
Abstract
A general theory is developed to analyze the efficiency and income distribution effects of a biofuel consumer tax credit and the interaction effects with a price contingent farm subsidy. Using the U.S. ethanol market as a stylized example, ethanol prices rise above the gasoline price by the amount of the tax credit. Corn farmers therefore gain directly while gasoline consumers only gain from any reduction in world oil prices due to the extra ethanol production and domestic oil producers lose. Because increased ethanol production improves the terms of trade in both the export of corn and the import of oil, we determine the optimal tax credit and the conditions affecting it. Historically, the intercept of the ethanol supply curve is above the gasoline price. Hence, part of the tax credit is redundant and represents ‘rectangular’ deadweight costs. The tax credit reduces the tax costs of price supports but incurs tax costs itself and increases consumer costs of corn. Price supports eliminate, create, have no effect or have an ambiguous effect on rectangular deadweight costs, depending on whether there is ex ante or ex post water in the tax credit. There are situations where ethanol production occurs only because of price supports. A stylized empirical model of the U.S. corn market is calibrated to illustrate the welfare effects of a tax credit. Net social costs of the tax credit averaged $683 million. Rectangular deadweight costs averaged $1,056 mil., more than offsetting the improved terms of trade and reduced price contingent farm subsidies, and representing over 50 percent of the tax cost of the tax credit.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Institution: | Cornell University |
Original Title: | The Welfare Economics of an Excise-Tax Exemption for Biofuels |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | biofuels; tax exemption; rectangular deadweight costs; price subsidies; welfare economics |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q18 - Agricultural Policy ; Food Policy Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q17 - Agriculture in International Trade F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations |
Item ID: | 5151 |
Depositing User: | David Just |
Date Deposited: | 05 Oct 2007 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 07:35 |
References: | EC - European Commission (2007). Member States Reports in the Frame of Directive 2003/30EC http://ec.europa.eu/energy/res/legislation/biofuels_members_states_en.htm. Eidman, Vernon R. (2007). “Economics and Market Analysis of Energy Crops in Agriculture”, Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, April 26. Elobeid, A., S. Tokgoz, D. J. Hayes. B. A. Babcock and C. E. Hart. (2006). “The Long-Run Impact of Corn-Based Ethanol on the Grain, Oilseed, and Livestock Sectors: A Preliminary Assessment”, CARD Briefing Paper [06-BP 49], Iowa State University, November. Gardner, Bruce (2003). “Fuel Ethanol Subsidies and Farm Price Support: Boon or boondoggle?” Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Working Paper WP 03-11, University of Maryland, October. GMF (The German Marshall Fund). (2007). “Brazil Grills U.S. on Ethanol Subsidies” FarmPolicy.com, August 23. http://www.dtnethanolcenter.com/index.cfm?show=10&mid=56&pid=13&mid=65 Goulder, Lawrence H. and Roberton C. Williams III. (2003). “The Substantial Bias from Ignoring General Equilibrium Effects in Estimating Excess Burden, and a Practical Solution”, Journal of Political Economy, 2003, vol. 111, no. 4:898-927. IPC (International Food & Agricultural Trade Policy Council). (2006). WTO Disciplines and Biofuels: Opportunities and Constraints in the Creation of a Global Marketplace, IPC Discussion Paper, Washington DC, October. Jank, Marcos J., Geraldine Kutas, Luiz Fernando do Amaral and Andre M. Nassar. (2007). EU and U.S. Policies on Biofuels: Potential Impact on Developing Countries, The German Marshall Fund, Washington DC. Kojima, Masami, Donald Mitchell and William Ward. (2007). Considering Trade Policies for Liquid Biofuels. World Bank, Washington DC, June. Kojima, Masami and Todd Johnson. (2005). Potential for Biofuels for Transport in Developing Countries Energy Sector Management Assistance Programme (ESMAP) World Bank, Washington DC, October. Lugar, Richard G. (2007). S.162 National Fuels Initiative The Library of Congress, Washington DC., January. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:s.162: Martinez-Gonzalez, Ariadna, Ian Sheldon and Stanley Thompson (2007). “Estimating the Effects of U.S. Distortions in the Ethanol Market Using a Partial Equilibrium Trade Model”, Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Agricultural Economics Association, Portland,OR, July 29-August 1.31 Miranowski, John A. (2007). “Biofuel Incentives and the Energy Title of the 2007 Farm Bill”,Working paper in The 2007 Farm Bill & Beyond, American Enterprise Institute, Washington D.C. http://www.aei.org/research/farmbill/publications/pageID.1476,projectID.28/default.asp Parry, Ian W. H., Margaret Walls and Winston Harrington. (2007). “Automobile Externalities and Policies”. Journal of Economic Literature, June Vol. 45, Issue 2:373-399. Rajagopal, Deepak and David Zilberman. (2007). “Review of Environmental, Economic and Policy Aspects of Biofuels”, Policy Research Working Paper WPS4341, The World Bank Development Research Group, September. Redondo, Patricia Carmona. (2007). “An Overview of National Legal and Policy Frameworks for Bioenergy Production, Promotion and Use” Conference paper presented at the Workshop on Economics, Policies and Science of Bioenergy, Ravello, Italy 26-27 July. Rothkopf, Garten. (2007). A Blueprint for Green Energy in the Americas: Strategic Analysis of Opportunities for Brazil and the Hemisphere. Report prepared for the Inter-American Development Bank, Washington DC. Runge, C. Ford and Benjamin Senauer (2007) “How Biofuels Could Starve the Poor”, Foreign Affairs, Foreign Affairs Council, New York, May/June, Vol. 86, Issue 3, pp. 41-53. Schnitkey, Gary, Darrel Good and Paul Ellinger. (2007). “Crude Oil Price Variability and its Impact on Break-even Corn Prices”, Farm Economics Facts & Opinion, FEFO 07-11, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign, May 30. Steenblik, Ronald and Juan Simón. (2007). “Biofuels: At What Cost? Government Support for Ethanol and Biodiesel in Switzerland”, The Global Subsidies Initiative of the International Institute for Sustainable Development, Geneva, Switzerland, June. Swinnen, Jo and Harry de Gorter. (1998). “Endogenous Commodity Policy and the Social Benefits from Public Research Expenditures.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 80: 107-115. Tokgoz, S., A. Elobeid, J. F. Fabiosa, D. J. Hayes, B. A. Babcock, T. Yu, F. Dong, C. E. Hart and J. C. Beghin. (2007). “Emerging Biofuels: Outlook of Effects on U.S. Grain, Oilseed, and Livestock Markets”, Iowa State University Working Paper [07-SR 101], May. Tyner, Wallace E. (2007). “U.S. Ethanol Policy— Possibilities for the Future” Purdue University Working Paper ID-342-W, West Lafayette, Indiana. Tyner, Wallace E., and Justin Quear. (2006). “Comparison of a Fixed and Variable Corn Ethanol Subsidy”. Choices 21, no. 3(2006): 199-202. UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). (2006). The Emerging Biofuels Market: Regulatory, Trade and Development Implications, United Nations, New York and Geneva. Zilberman, David. (2007). “Interaction of Energy and Agriculture: Policies, Markets and Players”, paper presented to the conference sponsored by the Farm Foundation and USDA's Economic Research Service Global Biofuel Developments: Modeling the Effects on Agriculture, Washington DC, February 27. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/5151 |