Entry, Exit, and Productivity in Tunisian Manufacturing Industries

Ben Jelili, Riadh and Goaied, Mohamed (2009): Entry, Exit, and Productivity in Tunisian Manufacturing Industries. Published in:

Abstract

Almost all countries in the MENA region entered the new millennium with large unemployment rates. In this context, decision makers emphasize the role of efficient markets which could lead to higher firm creation rates and thereby, to lower unemployment rates. Aside to direct employment effects, high firm creation rates are supposed to have a positive impact on the technical and organizational change of economies because new firms are on average, better equipped with the latest technical and organizational knowledge. Indeed, in addition to expanding the range of products, entry can first create more competition, lower prices for consumers, and may lead to better technology adoption. Changes in the status of existing firms from informal to formal may also have important effects on GDP growth. This chapter presents some stylized facts about firms' entry and exit and economic performance in Tunisian manufacturing industries. The first section deals with regulations, upgrading program and business environment in Tunisia. Data used to analyze patterns of entry and exit in Tunisian manufacturing industries and their impact on firm’s performance are presented in Sect. 4.2. The determinants of entry and exit process are discussed in Sect. 4.3. This section focuses on the implications that the interdependence between aggregate entry and exit has for the analysis of manufacturing industry dynamics in Tunisia. The purpose of the forth section is to investigate whether entry and exit of firms affect performance and labor productivity.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Entry, exit, manufacturing industries, Productivity
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance; L - Industrial Organization > L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing

References

Agarwal R (1997) Survival of firms over the product life cycle. South Econ J 3:571–584

Agarwal R, Audretsch DB (2001) Does entry size matter? The impact of life cycle and technology on firm survival. J Ind Econ 49:21–43.

Cincera M, Galgau O (2005) Impact of market entry and exit on EU productivity and growth performance. European Commission Economic Papers No. 222.

Clerides SK, Lach S, Tybout JR (1998) Is learning-by-exporting important? Micro-dynamic evidence from Colombia, Morocco, and Mexico. Q J Econ 113(3):903–947.

Di Tommaso MR, Lanzoni E, Rubini L (2001) Support to SMEs in the Arab region: the case of Tunisia. UNIDO/UNDP, UNIDO Italia.

Disney R, Haskel J, Heden Y (2003) Restructuring and productivity growth in UK manufacturing. Econ J 113(489):666–694.

Dixit A (1981) The role of investment in entry deterrence’. Econ J 90:95–106

Djankov S, La Porta R, Lopez-De-Silanes F, Shleifer A (2002) The regulation of entry. Q J Econ CXVII (1):1–37.

Djankov S, McLiesh C, Ramalho R (2006) Regulation and growth. Econ Lett 92(3):395–401.

Evans LB, Siegfried JJ (1992) Entry and exit in United States manufacturing industries from 1977 to 1982. In: Audretsch DB, Sigfried JJ (eds) Empirical studies in honour of Leonard W. Weiss. Kluwer, Boston, pp 253–273.

Geroski PA, Mazzucato J (2001) Modelling the dynamics of industry populations. Int J Ind Organ 19:1003–1022.

Klepper S, Simons KL (2005) Industry shakeouts and technological change. Int J Ind Organ 23:23–43.

Morrisson C, Talbi B (1996) La croissance de l’économie tunisienne en longue période. OCDE, Paris.

Murphy EC (1999) Economic and political change in Tunisia: from Bourguiba to Ben Ali. MacMillan Press, Houndmills.

Roberts BM, Thompson S (2003) Entry and exit in a transition economy: the case of Poland. Rev Ind Organ 22:225–243.

Scarpetta S, Hemmings P, Tressel T, Woo J (2002) The role of policy and institutions for productivity and firm dynamics: evidence from micro and industry data. Economic Working Paper 15, OECD, Paris.

Shapiro D, Khemani RS (1987) The determinants of entry and exit reconsidered. Int J Ind Organ 5:15–26.