Potential impact of (CET) carbon emissions trading on China’s power sector: A perspective from different allowance allocation options

Cong, Rong-Gang and Wei, Yi-Ming (2010): Potential impact of (CET) carbon emissions trading on China’s power sector: A perspective from different allowance allocation options. Published in: Energy , Vol. 9, No. 35

Abstract

In Copenhagen climate conference China government promised that China would cut down carbon intensity 40e45% from 2005 by 2020. CET (carbon emissions trading) is an effective tool to reduce emissions. But because CET is not fully implemented in China up to now, how to design it and its potential impact are unknown to us. This paper studies the potential impact of introduction of CET on China’s power sector and discusses the impact of different allocation options of allowances. Agent-based modeling is one appealing new methodology that has the potential to overcome some shortcomings of traditional methods. We establish an agent-based model, CETICEM (CET Introduced China Electricity Market), of introduction of CET to China. In CETICEM, six types of agents and two markets are modeled. We find that: (1) CET internalizes environment cost; increases the average electricity price by 12%; and transfers carbon price volatility to the electricity market, increasing electricity price volatility by 4%. (2) CET influences the relative cost of different power generation technologies through the carbon price, significantly increasing the proportion of environmentally friendly technologies; expensive solar power generation in particular develops significantly, with final proportion increasing by 14%. (3) Emissionbased allocation brings about both higher electricity and carbon prices than by output-based allocation which encourages producers to be environmentally friendly. Therefore, output-based allocation would be more conducive to reducing emissions in the Chinese power sector.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Carbon emissions trading Emission-based allocation Output-based allocation Agent-based model
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy

References

[1] EC. Directive 2003/87/EC Establishing a scheme for greenhouse emission allowance trading within the community and amending council directive 96/61/EC, Report; 2003 See also, http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/energy/european_energy_policy/l28012_en.htm#AMENDINGACT.

[2] Svendsen GT. The idea of global CO2 trade. European Environment 1999;9:232-7.

[3] WeiYM, Liu LC, Fan Y,WuG.China energy report: CO2 emissions research. Beijing: Science Press. 2008 See also, http://www.sciencep.com/s_single.php?id¼14944.

[4] National Bureau of Statistics of China. China energy statistical yearbook 1997-2008. Beijing: China Statistical Press; 2008.

[5] Bohringer C, Lange A. On the design of optimal grandfathering schemes for emission allowances. European Economic Review 2005;49: 2041-55.

[6] Cramton P, Kerr S. Tradeable carbon permit auctions: how and why to auction not grandfather. Energy Policy 2002;30:333-45.

[7] Burtraw D, Palmer K, Bharvirkar R, Paul A. The effect of allowance allocation on the cost of carbon emission trading. RFF Discussion Paper; 2001.

[8] Paul A, Burtraw D. The RFF haiku electricity market model. RFF Discussion Paper; 2002.

[9] Haurie A, Viguier L. A stochastic dynamic game of carbon emissions trading. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 2003;8:239-48.

[10] Carlén B. Market power in international carbon emissions trading: a laboratory test. The Energy Journal 2003;24:1-26.

[11] Bosello F, Roson R. Carbon emissions trading and equity in international agreements. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 2002;7:29-37.

[12] Keats K, Neuhoff K, Martinez KK. Allocation of carbon emission certificates in the power sector: how generators profit from grandfathered rights. Climate Policy 2005;5:61-78.

[13] Szabó L, Hidalgo I, Ciscar JC, Soria A. CO2 emission trading within the European Union and Annex B countries: the cement industry case. Energy Policy 2006; 34:72-87.

[14] Chappin EJL, Dijkema GPJ. On the impact of CO2 emission-trading on power generation emissions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2009;76:358-70.

[15] Ma T, Nakamori Y. Modeling technological change in energy systems-from optimization to agent-based modeling. Energy 2009;34:873-9.

[16] BunnDW, Oliveira FS. Evaluating individual market power in electricity markets via agent-based simulation. Annals of Operations Research 2003;121(1):57-77.

[17] Ehlen MA, Scholand AJ, Stamber KL. The effects of residential real-time pricing contracts on transco loads, pricing, and profitability: simulations using the NABLE( TM) agent-based model. Energy Economics 2007;29(2):211-27.

[18] Bunn DW, Oliveira FS. Agent-based analysis of technological diversification and specialization in electricity markets. European Journal of Operational Research 2007;181(3):1265-78.

[19] Hamalainen RP, Mantysaari J, Ruusunen J, Pierre-Olivier P. Cooperative consumers in a deregulated electricity market e dynamic consumption strategies and price coordination. Energy 2000;25(9):857-75.

[20] Bernal-Agustin JL, Contreras J, Martin-Flores R, Conejo AJ. Realistic electricity market simulator for energy and economic studies. Electric Power Systems Research 2007;77:46-54.

[21] Cong RG, Wei YM. Auction design for the allocation of carbon emission allowances: uniform or discriminatory price? International Journal of Energy and Environment 2010;1(3):533-46.

[22] Raufer R, Li S. Emissions trading in China: a conceptual ‘leapfrog’ approach? Energy 2009;34(7):904-12.

[23] SERCdState Electricity Regulatory Commission. Monitoring report on the implementation of tariff 2008. Internal Report; 2008. See also, http://www. serc.gov.cn/zwgk/jggg/200809/W020080912334874610579.doc.

[24] Chappin EJL. Carbon dioxide emission trade impact on power generation portfolio, agent-based modelling to elucidate influences of emission trading on investments in Dutch electricity generation. Master Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft; 2006.

[25] Tietenberg T. The tradable permits approach to protecting the commons: lessons for climate change. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2003;19:400-19.

[26] Harrison D, Radov D. Evaluation of alternative initial allocation mechanisms in a European Union greenhouse gas emissions allowance trading scheme. Prepared for DG Environment, European Commission; 2002.

[27] Ahman M, Burtraw D, Kruger J, Zetterberg L. A ten year rule to guide the allocation of EU emission allowances. Energy Policy 2006;35:1718-30.

[28] Peng C. China hydropower project in the 21st century. Beijing: China Water Power Press; 2006.

[29] SERCdState Electricity Regulatory Commission. Electricity regulatory annual report. Internal Report; 2007 See also, http://www.serc.gov.cn/zwgk/jggg/200808/t20080801_9841.htm.