Dutta, Bhaskar and Gupta, Poonam (2012): How Do Indian Voters Respond to Candidates with Criminal Charges : Evidence from the 2009 Lok Sabha Elections.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_53868.pdf Download (771kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We use data for the 2009 Lok Sabha elections to examine the response of voters to candidates who have reported that they have criminal charges against them. Our empirical results show that voters do penalise candidates with criminal charges, but the magnitude of the penalty decreases if there are other candidates in the constituency with criminal charges. The vote shares are positively related to candidate wealth, with the marginal effect being higher for the candidates with criminal charges. Moreover, candidates with criminal charged also have greater wealth.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | How Do Indian Voters Respond to Candidates with Criminal Charges : Evidence from the 2009 Lok Sabha Elections |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Elections, India |
Subjects: | P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems > P16 - Political Economy |
Item ID: | 53868 |
Depositing User: | Poonam Gupta |
Date Deposited: | 25 Feb 2014 08:35 |
Last Modified: | 04 Oct 2019 17:56 |
References: | Aidt, Toke, Miriam A. Golden & Devesh Tiwari, September 2011. “Incumbents and Criminals in the Indian National Legislature,” Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1157. Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge. Banerjee, Abhijit V. & Rohini Pande, July 2009. “Parochial Politics: Ethnic Preferences and Political Corruption,” CID Working Paper 147. Center for International Development at Harvard University. Banerjee, Abhijit V., Selvan Kumar, Rohini Pande, & Felix Su, November 2011. “Do informed voters make better choices? Experimental Evidence from Urban India,” mimeo. Bobonis, Gustavo J., Luis R. Cámara Fuertes, & Rainer Schwabe, December 2012. “The Dynamic Effects of Information on Political Corruption: Theory and Evidence from Puerto Rico,” Documento de Investigación 2012-14. Banco de México. Brollo, Fernanda, January 2011. “Who Is Punishing Corrupt Politicians – Voters or the Central Government? Evidence from the Brazilian Anti-Corruption Program,” Working Paper 336. Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research at Università Bocconi. Chemin, Matthieu, September 2008. “Do Criminal Politicians Reduce Corruption? Evidence from India,” CIRPÉE Working Paper 08-25, Department of Economics, University of Quebec at Montreal. Dutta, Bhaskar and Gupta, Poonam, 2012, "How Indian Voters Respond to Candidates with Criminal Charges: Evidence from the 2009 Lok Sabha Elections,"Working Papers 12/109, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy. Ferraz, Claudio & Frederico Finan, 2008. “Exposing Corrupt Politicians: The Effects of Brazil’s Publicly Released Audits on Electoral Outcomes,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(2):703–745. Gupta, Poonam and Arvind Panagariya, 2012, “Growth and Election Outcomes in a Developing Country”, Working Papers 11/92, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy. Paul, Samuel & M. Vivekananda, 2004. “Holding a Mirror to the New Lok Sabha,”Economic and Political Weekly 39(45):4927–4934. Vaishnav, Milan, 2012. “The Market for Criminality: Money, Muscle and Elections in India,” In The Merits of Money and “Muscle”: Essays on Criminality, Elections and Democracy in India. PhD Dissertation, Columbia University. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/53868 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
How Do Indian Voters Respond to Candidates with Criminal Charges : Evidence from the 2009 Lok Sabha Elections. (deposited 28 Apr 2012 07:11)
- How Do Indian Voters Respond to Candidates with Criminal Charges : Evidence from the 2009 Lok Sabha Elections. (deposited 25 Feb 2014 08:35) [Currently Displayed]