Yefimov, Vladimir (1997): Approche institutionnelle de l'analyse de la transition (le cas de l'agriculture du Nord-Kazakhstan). Published in: Revue d'études comparatives Est-Ouest , Vol. 28, No. 2 (1997): pp. 99-119.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_54588.pdf Download (319kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The causes of the failure of the neoclassical approach to the economic transition in the countries formerly belonging to the Soviet Union are analyzed at a general level and then in the specific case of agriculture in North Kazakhstan. Three dimensions of Soviet-type economic institutions (legislation, organizations and culture) enter into the general analysis. Among the basic notions that are cursorily presented, attention is drawn to the economic culture. A description of the characteristics of Soviet agricultural institutions (state-owned land, collective farms, state farms, individual plots and local authorities in rural areas) completes this analysis at the general level. These theoretical patterns then serve to analyze the first two phases (stabilization and introduction of the market) in the neoclassical transition strategy as applied to farming in North Kazakhstan. In this area, the institutions inherited from the Soviet era continue to survive, sometimes under a slightly disguised form. They account for both the non-completion of a real transition and the gradual decline in farming. In these conditions, the third phase (structural corrections) of the transition under the neoclassical paradigm cannot be envisioned. Alternative proposals based on an institutional approach are presented.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Approche institutionnelle de l'analyse de la transition (le cas de l'agriculture du Nord-Kazakhstan) |
English Title: | Institutional approach for transition analysis (the case of Northern Kazakhstan's agriculture) |
Language: | French |
Keywords: | l'échec de l'approche néoclassique de la transition, trois dimensions des institutions économiques de type soviétique (législation, organisations et culture) |
Subjects: | P - Economic Systems > P3 - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions P - Economic Systems > P3 - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions > P32 - Collectives ; Communes ; Agriculture Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture |
Item ID: | 54588 |
Depositing User: | Dr Vladimir Yefimov |
Date Deposited: | 19 Mar 2014 14:35 |
Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2019 15:05 |
References: | Andreff W. (1993), La Crise des Economies Socialistes : La Rupture d’un Système, Grenoble : Presses Universitaires de Grenoble. Angresano J.(1996), Comparative Economics, Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice Hall Aoki M. (1996), “Towards a comparative institutional analysis : motivations and some tentative theorizing”,The Japanese Economic Review, 47(1), pp.1-19. Boyer R. et Y. Saillard (sous la direction de) (1995), Théorie de la Régulation. L’Etat des Savoirs, Paris : Editions La Découverte. Bromsel O. (1995), “Enjeux industriels du post-socialisme: capitalisation et entreprisation”, Revue d’Economie Industrielle, 72, pp.31-46 Coase R.H. (1937), “The nature of the firm”, Economica, 4, pp.386-405, publié egalement dans Williamson O.E. et S.G.Winter (Eds.)(1993),The Nature of the Firm. Origins, Evolution, and Development, New York, Oxford : Oxford University Press, pp.18-33. Cook L.J. et V.E.Gimpelson (1995), “Exit and voice in Russian managers’ privatisation strategies”, Communist Economics & Economic Transformation, 7, pp.465-483. Csaki C. et Z.Lerman (1994), “Land reform and farm sector restructuring in the former socialist countries in Europe”, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 21, pp.553-576. Day R.H. (1995), “Rationality, entrepreneurship and institutional evolution”, Revue Economique, 6, pp.1473-1485. Delorme R. et Ch. André (1983), L’Etat et l’Economie, Paris : Editions du Seuil, voir 4ème partie: L’Etat et l’agriculture. Guerrien B.(1989), La Théorie Néo-Classique, Paris : Economica Jogoleva E.et V.Kovalenko (1995), “Les incertitudes de la réforme agraire en Russie”, Revue d’Etudes Comparatives Est-Ouest, 3, pp.197-227. Knutson R.D. et al.(1983), Agricultural and Food Policy, Englewood Cliffs; N.J. : Prentice-Hall Kornai J.(1992), The Socialist System. The Political Economy of Communism, Princeton : Princeton University Press. Morvan Y. (1991), Fondements d’Economie Industrielle, Paris : Economica. Mroz T.A.et B.M.Popkin (1995), “Poverty and the economic transition in the Russian Federation”, International Labor Review, 134, pp.1-31. North D.C.(1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. Parsons T. et E.A.Shils (Eds.) (1951), Towars a General Theory of Action, Cambridge,MA : Havard University Press. Parsons T.(1960), Structure and Process in Modern Societies, Clancoe,IL : Free Press Pelikan P. (1995), “Les entrprises d’Etat après le socialisme : pourquoi et comment les privatiser rapidement”, Revue d’Etude Comparatives Est-Ouest, 2, pp.5-37. Pouliquen A. (1990), “L’agriculture soviétique : de la crise à la décollectivisation problématique”, dans: L’URSS au Tournant : Une Economie en Transition (sous la direction de J. Sapir), Paris : L’Harmattan, pp.65-106. Pouliquen A. (1994), “L’ordre social soviétique et l’économie administrée. Une grille utile pour l’analyse du post-communisme”, Revue d’Etude Comparative Est-Ouest, 2, pp.5-25. Sachs J. (1994), Rynochnaya Ekonomika i Rossia (L’Economie de marché et la Russie), Moscou : Ekonomika (en Russe). Sapir J. (1992), Feu le Système Soviétique ? Permanences Politiques, Mirages Economiques, Enjeux Stratégiques, Paris : Editions La Découverte. Sapir J. (1995), “Crise et transition en URSS et en Russie”, in : Théorie de la Régulation. L’Etat des Savoirs, (sous la direction de Boyer R. et Y. Saillard), Paris : Editions La Découverte, pp.435-442.. Simon H. (1977), New Science of Management Decision, Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice Hall. Servolin C.(1989), L’Agriculture Moderne, Paris : Editions du Seuil. Tacis (1995), Proposals for Privatisation of the Pilot Farms, Florence, Cambridge : Agristudio, WS Atkins (Projet de l’Assistance Technique KAZ9301). Vasiliev S.A. (1993), “Economic reform in Russia : social, political and institutional aspects”, in : Aslund A. et R.Layard (Eds.), Changing the Economic System in Russia, New York : St-Martin’s Press, pp.72-86 . Williamson O.E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York : Free Press. Yefimov V. (1981), “Gaming-simulation of the functioning of economic systems”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2(2), pp.187-200. Yefimov V. (1993), Transition of the Russian Agri-Food Sector to a Market Economy and the Western Consultancy, Cergy-Pontoise : IGIA (Mémoire). Yefimov V. (1995), “Le système agro-alimentaire de type soviétique”, dans: Agriculture et Pays d’Europe Centrale et Orientale, Paris : INRA, pp.16-21. Zaslavskaya T.I. et R.V.Ryvkina (1991), Sotsiologia Economitcheskoj Zhizni (Sociologie de la vie économique), Novosibirsk : Nauka (en Russe). |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/54588 |