Is there a rule of thumb for absolute purchasing power parity to hold?

Zhang, Zhibai (2014): Is there a rule of thumb for absolute purchasing power parity to hold?

Abstract

We find an example where real exchange rate (RER) is stationary and the nominal exchange rate and the price levels are cointegrated but purchasing power parity (PPP) does not hold, which reveals a fault of the unit root and cointegration tests in this use. We argue that the distribution of an RER misalignment can be used in testing absolute PPP. Then we apply this new test and the coefficient restriction test to study the validity of absolute PPP in 40 main countries and areas (versus the US) in light of the Harrod-Balassa-Samuelson effect. The econometric proofs show that absolute PPP holds or closely holds in most countries when their averaged relative GDP per capita (GDPPs, against the US with the US = 1) are greater than 0.7. And it does not hold in almost all countries when their averaged GDPPs are smaller than 0.7. Thus, a rule of thumb for the theory to hold is that the GDPP should be above 0.7.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Absolute purchasing power parity; Real exchange rate; RER misalignment distribution test; Harrod-Balassa-Samuelson effect
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F30 - General; F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F31 - Foreign Exchange

References

Astorga, P., 2012. Mean reversion in long-horizon real exchange rates: evidence from Latin America. Journal of International Money and Finance 31(6), 1529–1550.

Chang, T., Tzeng, H.W., 2011. Long-run purchasing power parity with asymmetric adjustment: further evidence from nine transition countries. Economic Modelling 28(3), 1383–1391.

Chang, T., Lee, C.H., Liu, W.C., 2012. Nonlinear adjustment to purchasing power parity for ASEAN countries. Japan and the World Economy 24(4), 325–331.

Cheung, Y.W., Chinn, M.D., Pascual, A.G., 2005. Empirical exchange rate models of the nineties: are any fit to survive? Journal of International Money and Finance 24(7), 1150–1175.

Edison, H., Gagnon, J., Melick, W, 1997. Understanding the empirical literature on purchasing power parity: the post-Bretton Woods era. Journal of International Money and Finance 16(1), 1–17.

Engel, C., 2000. Long-run PPP may not hold after all. Journal of International Economics 51(2), 243–273.

Frenkel, J.A., 1981. The collapse of purchasing power parities during the 1970’s. European Economic Review 16(1), 145–165.

Isard, P., 2007. Equilibrium exchange rates: assessment methodologies. IMF Working Paper No. 296.

Ito, T., 1997. The long-run purchasing power parity for the yen: historical overview. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 11(4), 502–521.

Lothian, J.R., Taylor, M.P., 1996. Real exchange rate behavior: the recent float from the perspective of the past two centuries. Journal of Political Economy 104(3), 488–509.

Pedroni, P., 2004. Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory 20(3), 597–625.

Rogoff, K., 1996. The purchasing power parity puzzle. Journal of Economic Literature 34(2), 647–668.

Taylor, A.M., Taylor, M.P., 2004. The purchasing power parity debate. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 18(4), 135–158.

Taylor, M.P., Peel, D.A., Sarno, L., 2001. Nonlinear mean-reversion in real exchange rates: toward a solution to the purchasing power parity puzzles. International Economic Review 42(4), 1015–1042.