Long-term unemployment in the varieties of capitalism

Chilosi, Alberto (2013): Long-term unemployment in the varieties of capitalism.

Abstract

Usually, when the attention is focused on the different performances of the labour market, the overall rate of unemployment is at the center stage. But this is misleading: while short term unemployment can be seen as physiological for the the working of the labour market, long-term unemployment is certainly pathological. The paper considers how the different varieties of capitalism affect the rate of long-term unemployment, rather than the aggregate rate. The liberal market variety, where employment protection is the lowest, presents lower rates of long-term unemployment than the continental European and the Mediterranean varieties. In the latter both employment protection and long-term unemployment are the highest and labour market participation the lowest. The social-democratic Scandinavian variety gets the best of both worlds: low rates of long-term unemployment, high rates of labour participation, lower degree of inequality, with relatively high levels of employment protection. However the Scandinavian model may be hardly applicable in countries, such as the Mediterranean ones, where a sizable part of public opinion apparently adheres to the various specifications of the “lump of something” economic fallacy. Low rates of long-term unemployment and high levels of labour participation are also produced by the far-Eastern Asian variety, but at the cost of a markedly dualistic labour market structure.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Long-term unemployment, varieties of capitalism, employment protection, economic fallacies
• Subjects: J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers > J60 - General; P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems

References

Acemoglu D., Robinson J. A., Verdier T. (2012), “Asymmetric Growth and Institutions in an Interdependent World: Can’t We All Be More Like Nordics?”, NBER Working Paper 18441, National Bureau of Economic Research

Alderman H., Yemtsov, R. (2013), “How Can Safety Nets Contribute to Economic Growth?”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 6437 (May)

Alesina, A. (2006), “Welfare Policies in the UNECE Region: Why So Different”, UNECE Discussion Paper 2006.3

Amable, B. (2003), The Diversity of Modern Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford Un. Press

Amable, B. (2009), “Structural Reforms in Europe and the (In)Coherence of Institutions”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25: 17–39

Andersen T. M., Holmström B, Honkapohja S., Korkman S, Söderström H. T., Vartiainen J. (2007), The Nordic Model, Embracing Globalization and Sharing Risks, Helsinki: The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy (ETLA)

Aoki, M. (1994), “The Japanese Firm as a System of Attributes: A Survey and Research Agenda”, in M. Aoki, R. Dore, The Japanese Firm: Sources of Competitive Strength, Oxford: Clarendon Press: 11-40.

Becker, U. (2009), Open Varieties of Capitalism: Continuity, Change and Performances, Basinstoke: Palgrave McMillan

Bertola, G. (1998), “Microeconomic Perspectives on Aggregate Labor Markets”, EUI Working Paper ECO No. 98/23

Böckerman P., Ilmakunnas P., Johansson E. (2011), “Job Security and Employee Well-Being: Evidence From Matched Survey and Register Data”, Labor Economics, 18: 547-554

Boeri T., Van Ours J. (2008), The Economics of Imperfect Labor Markets, Princeton: Princeton Un. Press

Calmors L., Driffil J. (1988), “Bargaining Structure, Corporatism and Macroeconomic Performance”, Economic Policy, 6: 13-47

Chilosi, A. (2012), “Stakeholder Protection, Varieties of Capitalism, and Long-Term Unemployment”, The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 9: 197-228

Clark A., Postel-Vinay F. (2009), “Job Security and Job Protection”, Oxford Economic Papers, 61: 207–239

Demsetz, H. (1969), “Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint”, Journal of Law and Economics, 12: 1-22

Freeman, R. B. (1988), “Labour Market Institutions and Economic Performance”, Economic Policy, 3: 63-80

GII (2012), The Global Innovation Index 2012, INSEAD and WIPO (World International Property Organization)

Grubb, D., J. Lee, Tergeist, P. (2007), “Addressing Labour Market Duality in Korea”, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 61

Hall P.A., Soskice D. (2001), “Introduction”, in P.A. Hall., D. Soskice (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press

ILO (2012), Key Indicators of the Labour Market (KILM), Seventh Edition, http://www.ilo.org/empelm/pubs/WCMS_114060/lang--en/index.htm

Martin, J., Scarpetta, P. (2011), “Setting It Right: Employment Protection, Labour Reallocation and Productivity”, IZA Policy Paper No. 27

OECD (2010), Indicators on Employment Protection - annual time series data 1985-2008, Version 2 - updated 24-09-2010, www.oecd.org/dataoecd/62/38/42773608.xls

Origo F., Pagani L. (2009), “Flexicurity and Job Satisfaction in Europe: The Importance of Perceived and Actual Job Stability for Well-Being at Work”, Labour Economics: 547-555

Skedinger P. (2010), Employment Protection Legislation: Evolution, Effects, Winners and Losers, Cheltenham: Elgar

Saint-Paul G. (2002), “The Political Economy of Employment Protection”, Journal of Political Economy: 672-704

Tachibanaki T., Taki A. (2000), Capital and Labour in Japan: the Functions of Two Actor Markets, Abingdon: Routledge

Walsh, B. (2002), “When Unemployment Disappears : Ireland in the 1990s”, UCD Centre for Economic Research Working Paper Series WP02/29, University College Dublin. School of Economics, http://www.ucd.ie/economics/research/papers/2002/WP02.29.pdf