Modeling Portfolio Risk by Risk Discriminatory Trees and Random Forests

Yang, Bill Huajian (2013): Modeling Portfolio Risk by Risk Discriminatory Trees and Random Forests. Published in: Journal of Risk Model Validation , Vol. 8, No. 1 (18 March 2014)

Abstract

Common tree splitting strategies involve minimizing a criterion function for minimum impurity (i.e. difference) within child nodes. In this paper, we propose an approach based on maximizing a discriminatory criterion for maximum risk difference between child nodes. Maximum discriminatory separation based on risk is expected in credit risk scoring and rating. The search algorithm for an optimal split, proposed in this paper, is efficient and simple, just a scan through the dataset. Choices of different trees, with options either more or less aggressive in variable splitting, are made possible. Two special cases are shown to relate to the Kolmogorov Smirnov (KS) and the intra-cluster correlation (ICC) statistics. As a validation of the proposed approaches, we estimate the exposure at default for a commercial portfolio. Results show, the risk discriminatory trees, constructed and selected using the bagging and random forest, are robust. It is expected that the tools presented in this paper will add value to general portfolio risk modelling.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Exposure at default, probability of default, loss given default, discriminatory tree, CART tree, random forest, bagging,, KS statistic, intra-cluster correlation, penalty function, risk concordance
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C14 - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General; G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G32 - Financing Policy ; Financial Risk and Risk Management ; Capital and Ownership Structure ; Value of Firms ; Goodwill; G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G38 - Government Policy and Regulation

References

[1] Amit, Y. and Geman, D.(1997). Shape quantization and recognition with randomized trees. Neural Computation 9 (7): 1545–1588.

[2]Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2004). International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards

[3] Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2005). An Explanatory Note on the Basel II IRB Risk Weight Functions. July 2005.

[4] Breiman, L. (1996). Bagging Predictors. Machine Learning 24: 123-140

[5] Breiman, L. (1996). Heuristics of instability and stabilization in model selection. Ann. Statist. 24:2350-2383

[6] Breiman, L. (1996). Technical Note: Some Properties of Splitting Criteria. Machine Learning 24: 41-47

[7] Breiman, L. (2001). Random Forests, Machine Learning 45: 5-32

[8] Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., Stones, C. J. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. Chapman & Hall, New York

[9] Buhlmann, P. and Yu, B. (2003). Analyzing bagging, Ann. Statist. 30: 927-961

[10] Chou, P. A. (1991). Optimal Partitioning for Classification and Regression Trees. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Volume 13 (4): 340-354

[11] Friedman, J., Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R. (2008). The Elements of Statistical Learning. 2nd Edition, Springer

[12] Ho, T. K. (1995). Random Decision Forest. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, Montreal, QC, 14–16 August 1995. pp. 278–282.

[13] Ho, T. K.(1998). The Random Subspace Method for Constructing Decision Forests. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20 (8): 832–844.

[14] Jacobs, M. (2008). An Empirical Study of Exposure at Default, Risk Analysis Division/Credit Risk Modeling. Moody’s KMV Credit Practitioner’s Conference

[15] Lin, Y. and Jeon, Y. (2006). Random forests and adaptive nearest neighbors. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 101:578-590

[16] Pindyck, R. S. and Rubinfeld, D. L. (1998). Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. 4th Edition, Irwin/McGraw-Hill, pp. 159-175

[17] SAS Institute Inc. (1997). SAS/Stat Software: Changes and Enhancements through Release 6.12, pp.431-432

[18] William H. Press, Saul A. Teukolsky, William T. Vetterling, and Brain P. Flannery (2003). Numerical Recipes in C++, Cambridge University Press, 2nd Edition, 2003

[19] Yang, B. H. and Tkachenko, M. (2012). Modeling Exposure at Default and Loss Given Default: Empirical approaches and technical implementation. Journal of Credit Risk, Volume 8 (2), pp. 81-102