Melecky, Ales and Melecky, Martin (2014): The Checks of Czechs: Optimizing the Debt Portfolio of the Czech Government.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_57604.pdf Download (944kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Sound debt management practices help protect government expenditures on debt servicing from aggregate shocks and prevent the occurrence of debt crises. Building on Giavazzi and Missale (2004), this article examines the optimal allocation of government debt for the Czech Republic. To calibrate conditional expectations of macro variables and to identify unexpected shocks, a vector autoregression (VAR) model for the Czech macroeconomy is estimated. The estimated optimal allocations across short-term debt, inflation-linked debt, long-term debt, and foreign currency debt are then discussed in relation to the actual allocations implemented by the government debt managers in the Czech Republic. We find that the manager of Czech government’s debt allocates too much debt into short-term bills and too little debt into inflation-linked bonds based on the estimated optimal allocations. Deepening the market for inflation-linked bonds and improving government cash management are the core policy recommendations.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Checks of Czechs: Optimizing the Debt Portfolio of the Czech Government |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Public debt management; Optimal debt allocation; VAR model; Czech Republic, Emerging Market Economies. |
Subjects: | G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G11 - Portfolio Choice ; Investment Decisions H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H63 - Debt ; Debt Management ; Sovereign Debt |
Item ID: | 57604 |
Depositing User: | Martin Melecky |
Date Deposited: | 27 Jul 2014 20:38 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 12:50 |
References: | BOHN, H., 1990, ‘Tax Smoothing with Financial Instruments’, American Economic Review, vol. 80 No. 5, pp. 1217-1230. BOHN, H., 1998. ‘The Behavior of U.S. Public Debt and Deficits,’ The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 113(3), pp. 949-963, August. BUERA, F., NICOLINI, J. P., 2002. ‘Optimal Maturity of Government Debt without State Contingent Bonds’, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, DoE Working Papers 016. BULIR, A., 2004. ‘External and Fiscal Sustainability of the Czech Economy: A Quick Look Through the IMF’s Night-Vision Goggles‘, CNB Internal Research and Policy Note, 4/2004. CHINN, M. D., QUAYYUM, S., 2012. ‘Long Horizon Uncovered Interest Parity Re-Assessed‘,National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., Cambridge, NBER Working Paper No.18482. DYBCZAK, K., MELECKY, M., 2014. ‘EU fiscal stance vulnerability: Are the old members the gold members?‘ Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pp 87-101. EUROPEAN COMMISION, 2012. ‘Fiscal Sustainability Report 2012‘, European Economy 8/2012, Economic and Financial Affairs 2012, Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2012/pdf/ee-2012-8_en.pdf. GERARD, M., GILSON, N., 2001. ‘Public debt structure and exchange rate regime’, Dipartimento di Economia Politica dell'Università di Milano Bicocc Working Paper. GIAVAZZI, F., MISSALE, A., 2004. ‘Public Debt Management in Brazil’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., Cambridge, NBER Working Paper No.10394. HAWKESBY, C., WRIGHT, J., 1997, ‘The Optimal Public Debt Portfolios for Nine OECD Countries: A Tax-Smoothing Approach’, University of Auckland Working Paper. IMF AND THE WORLD BANK, 2001. ‘Guidelines for Public Debt Management‘, Washington D.C., Available from: http://www.imf.org/external/np/mae/pdebt/2000/eng/guide.pdf. IMF, 2013. ‘Czech Republic, 2013 Article IV Consultation‘, IMF Country Report No. 13/243, Washington D.C., Available from: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2013/cr13243.pdf. LIBICH, J., STEHLIK, P., 2012.’Monetary Policy Facing Fiscal Indiscipline under Generalized Timing of Actions‘, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, vol. 168(3), pp. 393-431. MATALIK, I., SLAVIK, M., 2005. ‘Debt Management in the Czech Republic (formation in the 1990s and the current state) ‘. Prague Economic Papers vol. 1, pp. 33-50. MELECKY, A., MELECKY, M., 2012. ‘The Impact of Macroeconomic Shocks on the Government Debt Dynamics: How Robust is the Fiscal Stance of the Czech Republic?‘, Politická ekonomie, University of Economics, Prague, vol. 2012(6), pp 723-742. MELECKY, M., 2012a. ‘Formulation of Public Debt Management Strategies: An Empirical Study of Possible Drivers‘, Economic Systems, Vol. 36, pp. 218-234. MELECKY, M., 2012b. ‘Choosing The Currency Structure Of Foreign‐Currency Debt: A Review Of Policy Approaches‘, Journal of International Development, Vol.24, pp. 133-151. MELECKY, M., 2010. ‘Currency Allocation of Public External Debt and Synchronization Indicators of Exchange Rate Volatility‘, Comparative Economic Studies 52 (2010), pp. 104-129. MISSALE, A., 1997. ‘Managing the Public Debt: The Optimal Taxation Approach‘, Journal of Economic, Surveys vol. 11 (3). MISSALE, A., BLANCHARD, O. J. (1991). ‘The Debt Burden and Debt Maturity‘, NBER Working Paper, No. 3944. SARGENT, T. J., WALLACE, N., 1981, ‘Some Unpleasant Monetarist Arithmetic‘, Quarterly Review, Vol. 5, No. 3. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. WHEELER, G., 2004. Sound Practice in Government Debt Management, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development: World Bank USA. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/57604 |