Bracket Creep Revisited: Progressivity and a Solution by Adjusting the Rich Tax in Germany

Flores Unzaga, Ismael Martin and Zhu, Junyi (2014): Bracket Creep Revisited: Progressivity and a Solution by Adjusting the Rich Tax in Germany.

Abstract

This paper studies the redistributive and revenue effects of bracket creep in Germany under various inflation scenarios and evaluates the feasibility to charge a rich tax to fight bracket creep for the income distribution in 2009. Using a tax micro-simulation model developed for the newly available PHF data, we document an inverted U-shaped overall redistribution effect of the tax system with respect to the inflation rate, which contrasts Immervoll (2005) who finds that the fiscal drag always enhances the equalizing property. Delaying indexation might not be better off in terms of inequality. A politically in-between approach is proposed to raise the marginal tax rate for the top bracket to compensate the government revenue loss due to indexing the tax schedule in Germany. The rich tax required for fully financing the indexation can be sizable. Under our simulation environment, this rate can reach above 75% with four years’ inaction on 4% annual inflation. When this rich tax can be fiscally possible, it can totally offset the decrease of global redistribution effect from indexation. Our results echo the inequality indexing proposed by Burman, Shiller, Leiserson, Rohaly and Kennedy (2007) by suggesting institutionalizing a joint adjustment of rich tax and bracket creep / inflation indexing which justifies a pro-growth, risk reducing, revenue-neutral and framing effective policy.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Inflation, Fiscal Drag, Rich Tax, Progressivity of Income Tax, Income Distribution, Micro-simulation, Inequality Indexation
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C8 - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology ; Computer Programs > C81 - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data ; Data Access; D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions; H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities ; Redistributive Effects ; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies; H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H24 - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies

References

Adam, K., & Billi, R. M. (2014). Distortionary fiscal policy and monetary policy goals. Eco-nomics Letters, 122(1), 1-6.

Aronson, J. R., Johnson, P. and Lambert, P. J. (1994). Redistributive Effect and Unequal In-come Tax Treatment, The Economic Journal, 104(423), 262-270.

Atkinson, A. B. (1970). On the Measurement of Inequality, Journal of Economic Theory, 2(3), 244-263.

Atkinson, A. B. (1980). Horizontal Equity and the Distribution of the Tax Burden. In H. J. Aaron and M. J. Boskin, editors, The Economics of Taxation, 3-18. Brookings, Washington D.C.

Bach, S. (2012). Abbau der kalten Progression: Nicht die einzige Herausforderung beim Ein-kommensteuertarif, Wochenbericht des DIW Berlin, Nr. 12/2012.

Bach, S., Corneo, G. and Steiner, V. (2013a). Effective Taxation of Top Incomes in Germany, German Economic Review, 14(2), 115-137.

Bach, S., Haan, P. and Ochmann, R. (2013b). Reformvorschläge zur Einkommensteuer: Mehr echte und weniger kalte Progression, Wochenbericht des DIW Berlin, Nr. 30/2013.

Betti, G., Donatiello, G. and Verma, V. (2011). The siena micro-simulation model (SM2) for net-gross conversion of EU-Silc variables, International Journal of Micro-simulation, 4(1), 35-53.

Boss, A. (2011). Heimliche Steuererhöhungen vermeiden! Research Report No. 41. Institut für Weltwirtschaft an der Universität Kiel.

Brenke, K. and Grabka, M. (2011). Schwache Lohnentwicklung im letzten Jahrzehnt, Wo-chenbericht des DIW Berlin, Nr. 45/2011.

Broer, M. (2011). Kalte Progression in der Einkommensbesteuerung, Wirtschaftsdienst, 91(10), 694-698.

Burman, L., Shiller, R. J., Leiserson, G., Rohaly, J., & Kennedy, P. J. F. (2007). The rising tide tax system: indexing the tax system for changes in inequality. Draft manuscript, Tax Policy Center.

Dahl, M. S. and Sorenson, O. (2010). The Social Attachment to Place, Social Forces, 89(2), 633-658.

Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung. (2014). Glossar – Kalte Progression, https://www.diw.de/de/diw_01.c.412410.de/presse_glossar/diw_glossar/kalte_progression.html, accessed on January 17th 2014.

Diamond, P. and Saez, E. (2012). High Tax Rates Won't Slow Growth. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303425504577353843997820160.html, ac-cessed on April 19th, 2014.

Docquier, F. and Marfouk, A. (2005). International Migration by Education Attainment, 1990–2000. In Schiff, M. and Ozden, C., editors, International Migration, Remittances and the Brain Drain, 151–200. World Bank, Washington.

Federal Ministry of Finance (2011). Structure and distribution of tax revenue. http://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/DE/Monatsberichte/Standardartikel_Migration/2011/06/analysen-und-berichte/b04-struktur-und-verteilung-der-steuereinnahmen/struktur-und-verteilung-der-steuereinnahmen.html-doc215728bodyText2, accessed on February 19th, 2014.

Federal Statistical Office (2011). Bruttoinlandsprodukt 2011 für Deutschland. https://www.destatis.de/DE/PresseService/Presse/Pressekonferenzen/2012/BIP2011/Pressebroschuere_BIP2011.pdf?__blob=publicationFile, accessed on April 18th, 2014.

Federal Statistical Office (2013). Yearly income taxes statistics 2009. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/FinanzenSteuern/Steuern/LohnEinkommensteuer/Einkommensteuerstatistik2140711097004.pdf?__blob=publicationFile, accessed on March 15th, 2014.

Gallego Granados, P. and Ochmann, R. (2012). EUROMOD Country Report – Germany. Discussion Paper No. 12. EUROMOD.

German Bundestag (2012). Entwurf eines Gesetzes zum Abbau der kalten Progression. Drucksache 17/8683.

Gottfried, P. and Witczak, D. (2008). Gesamtwirtschaftliche Auswirkungen der „heimlichen Steuerprogression“ und steuerpolitische Handlungsoptionen zur Entlastung von Bürgern und Wirtschaft. Final report of the project ID 4 – 60/07 commissioned by the Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology. Institut für Angewandte Wirtschaftsforschung (IAW).

Gutierrez, R., Immervoll, H. and Sutherland, H. (2005). How European Union Member States adjust tax and benefit systems for inflation. Working Paper, EUROMOD.

Hechtner, F., Massarrat-Mashhadi, N. and Sielaff, C. (2012). Eine Analyse zur Einkommen-steuerbelastung und Wirkung der kalten Progression der vergangenen 20 Jahre in Deutsch-land. Discussion Paper No. 137, Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre (arqus).

Heer, B. and Süssmuth, B. (2013). Tax Bracket Creep and its Effects on Income Distribution. Working Paper No. 123, Faculty of Economics and Management Science, Leipzig University.

Immervoll, H. (2005). Falling up the stairs: The effects of “bracket creep” on household in-comes, Review of Income and Wealth, 51(1), 37-62.

Kakwani, N. (1977a). Measurement of Tax Progressivity: An International Comparison, The Economic Journal, 87(345), 71-80.

Kakwani, N. (1977b). Applications of Lorenz Curves in Economic Analysis, Econometrica, 45(3), 719-728.

Kakwani, N. (1980). On a Class of Poverty Measures, Econometrica, 48(2), 437-446.

Lambert, P. J. (2001). The distribution and redistribution of income. Manchester University Press, Manchester.

Musgrave, R. A. and Thin, T. (1948). Income Tax Progression, 1929-48, Journal of Political Economy, 56(6), 498-514.

Musgrave, R. A., Musgrave, P. B. and Kullmer, L. (1994). Die öffentliche Finanzen in Theo-rie und Praxis. Updated 6th edition. J. C. B. Mohr, Tübingen.

Plotnick, R. (1981). A Measure of Horizontal Equity, Review of Economics and Statistics, 63(2), 283-288.

Reynolds, M., & Smolensky, E. (1977). Public expenditures, taxes, and the distribution of income. Academic, New York.

Saez, E. (2003). The effect of marginal tax rates on income: a panel study of ‘bracket creep’, Journal of Public Economics, 87(5-6), 1231-1258.

Saez, E. (2010). Do taxpayers bunch at kink points?. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 180-212.

Schaefer, T. (2013). Kalte Progression. Mikrosimulationsanalyse der Auswirkungen inflati-onsbedingter Einkommensteuererhöhungen. Study commissioned by the Initiative for a New Social Market Economy (INSM), Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft Köln.

Schmidt, T. and Eisele, M. (2013). Oversampling vermögender Haushalte im Rahmen der Studie „Private Haushalte und ihre Finanzen (PHF)“. http://www.bundesbank.de/Redaktion/EN/Downloads/Bundesbank/Research_Centre/phf_oversampling.pdf?__blob=publicationFile, accessed on May 10, 2014.

Schmidt, T.-P. and Müller, H. (2012). Die Elastizität des zu versteuernden Einkommens in Deutschland. Eine empirische Untersuchung auf Basis des deutschen Taxpayer-Panels. Dis-cussion Paper No. 132, Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre (arqus).

Shiller, Robert J., The New Financial Order: Risk in the 21st Century, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.

Simula, L. and Trannoy, A. (2010). Optimal income tax under the threat of migration by top-income earners, Journal of Public Economics, 94(1-2), 163-173.

Urban, I. (2009). Kakwani decomposition of redistributive effect: Origins, critics and up-grades. Working Paper, ECINEQ (Society for the Study of Economic Inequality).

Verbist, G. and Figari, F. (2014). The redistributive effect and progressivity of taxes revisited: An International Comparison across the European Union. Working Paper, EUROMOD.

Von Kalckreuth, U., Eisele, M., Le Blanc, J., Schmidt, T. and Zhu, J. (2012). The PHF: a comprehensive panel survey on household and wealth in Germany. Discussion Paper No. 13, Deutsche Bundesbank.

Young, C. and Varner, C. (2011). Millionaire Migration and State Taxation of Top Incomes: Evidence from a Natural Experiment, National Tax Journal, 64(2), 255-284.