The South African Bio ethanol blend mandate and its implications on regional agricultural markets and welfare

Sukati, Mphumuzi (2014): The South African Bio ethanol blend mandate and its implications on regional agricultural markets and welfare.

Abstract

The paper aims to analyse the potential impact of South African Biothanol Blend mandate on SACU region’s maize and sugar production (referred to as bioethanol crops commodities), trade and overall welfare outcomes. The study has been necessitated by the importance of maize as a staple food for the Southern African region and the importance of sugar to some of the SACU countries’ economies especially that of Swaziland. The simulation experiment has been an artificial decrease in cereal and sugar cane output in South Africa due to their diversion to bioethanol production, with a corresponding increase in petroleum output by a factor proportional to the blend mandate in place. This simulation has been undertaken using the GTAP7 model and database. Simulations results show that South African production of bioethanol and its blending to fuel will not result in major negative welfare changes in South Africa. However, production of bieothanol from maize negatively affects the rest of SACU member states in terms of welfare outcome and cereal prices. On the other hand, South Africa experience the most welfare benefits from maize based bioethanol. Production of bioethanol from sugar cane improves welfare in the rest of SACU region, such welfare envisaged to accumulate more to Swaziland, one of the region’s major low cost sugar producer and exporter. Bioethanol crops commodities industry output and trade changes for the rest of SACU member states trend with the level of commitment of that commodity in the South African bioethanol production and blending programme as expected.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Bioethanol Blend Mandate, GTAP 7, Welfare Outcomes
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Other Primary Products; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q16 - R&D ; Agricultural Technology ; Biofuels ; Agricultural Extension Services; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q28 - Government Policy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q48 - Government Policy

References

1. Alexandratos N (2008). ‘Food Price Surges: Possible Causes, Past Experiences and Longer Term Relevance’, Available at http://www.fao.org/es/esd/FoodPriceSurges-Alexandratos.pdf2

2. Aman E and Chad H (2007). ‘Ethanol Expansion in the Food versus Fuel Debate: How Will Developing Countries Fare?’, Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, Vol. 5, Iss.2, Article 6: 456-478.

3. Balat H, Balat M and Oz C (2008). ‘Progress in bioethanol processing’, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 34: 551–573.

4. Banse M, van Meijl H, Tabeau A, Woltjer G (2008). ‘Will EU Biofuel Policies Affect Global Agricultural Markets?’, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 35(2): 117-141.

5. Banse M, Tabeau A and Woltjer G (2008). ‘Impact of EU Biofuel Policies on World Agricultural and Food Markets’, Paper prepared for presentation at the 107th EAAE Seminar on Modelling of Agricultural and Rural Development Policies, Spain.

6. Bhattacharyya, Subhes C., (1996). ‘Applied General Equilibrium Models for Energy Studies: A survey’, Energy Economics, Vol. 18: 145-464.

7. Birur DK, Hertel TW and Tyner WE (2007). ‘The Biofuel Boom: Implications for World Food Markets’. Paper presented at the Food Economy Conference, 18–19 October 2007, The Hague, The Netherlands.

8. Boeters S, Veenendaal P, van Leeuwen N, Rojas-Romagoza H (2008). ‘The potential for biofuels alongside the EU-ETS’. Paper presented at the 11th Annual GTAP Conference, Helsinki, Finland.

9. Costa RC and Sodré JR (2010). ‘Hydrous ethanol vs. gasoline-ethanol blend: engine performance and emissions’, Fuel 89 (2): 287-293.

10. Decaluwé B and Martens A (1988). ‘CGE Modelling and Developing Economies: A Concise Empirical Survey of 73 Applications to 26 Countries’, Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 10, No. 4: 529-668.

11. Diop D, Blanco M, Flamini A, Schlaifer M, Kropiwnicka MA and Markhof MM (2013). ‘Assessing the impact of biofuels production on developing countries from the point of view of Policy Coherence for Development’. The European Union’s Framework Contract Commission 2011 Lot : Contract N° 2012/299193

12. Dixon PB, Osborne S and Rimmer MT (2007). ‘The economy-wide effects in the United States of replacing crude petroleum with biomass’. Energy and Environment 18 (6): 709–722.

13. Dodic´ SN, Dodic´ JM, Rankovic´ AJ, Popov D and Zavargo ZZ (2009). ‘Potential contribution of bioethanol fuel to the transport sector of Vojvodina’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 13: 2197–2200.

14.Dutta, P. K. (1999) ‘Strategies and Games: Theory and Practice.’ Cambridge, Mass: London : MIT Press.

15. European Commission (2007). ‘The impact of a minimum 10% obligation for biofuel use in the EU-27 in 2020 on agricultural markets’. AGRI G-2/WM D. Brussels.

16. FAO/European bank. (2008). ‘Sugar Beets/White Sugar’, Agribusiness Handbook, Vol 4.

17. FAO Statistics, Available at ‘http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx’.

18. Gohin E (2008). ‘Impacts of the European bio-fuel policy on the farm sector: a general equilibrium assessment’, Oxford Journals Economics & Social Sciences Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Volume 30, Issue 4: 623-641.

19. Gurgel AC, Reilly JM, Paltsev S (2007). ‘Potential Land Use Implications of a Global Biofuels Industry’. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, 5; Article 9 (Special Issue: Explorations in Biofuels Economics, Policy, and History).

20. Hertel TW, Tyner WE, Birur DK (2008). ‘Biofuels for All? Understanding the Global Impacts of Multinational Mandates.’ GTAP Working Paper No. 51. Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA.

21. Hertel TW, Golub A, Jones M, O`Hare M, Plevin R and Kamen D (2009b). ‘Global land use and GHG emission impacts of maize ethanol’. GTAP Working Paper No. 55. Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA.

22. Hertel TW, Tyner WE and Birur DK (2008). ‘Biofuels for all? Understanding the global impacts of multinational mandates’. GTAP Working Paper No. 51. Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA.

23. International Energy Agency (IEA) Statistics (2014). ‘available at http://www.iea.org.

24. ISO (2006). ‘Environmental management – Life Cycle Assessment – principles and framework’, ISO 14040.

25. Johnson F and Matsika E (2006). ‘Bio-energy trade and regional development: the case for bio-ethanol in Southern Africa’. Energy for Sustainable Development Volume 4, No. 1: 36-51.

26. Keeney R and Hertel TW (2009). ‘The Indirect Land Use Impacts of United States Biofuel Policies: The Importance of Acreage, Yield, and Bilateral Trade Responses’. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91 (4): 895–909.

27. Khan HA (2004). ‘Using Macroeconomic CGE Models for Analysing Poverty Reduction Impact of Structural Adjustment Policies’. Asian Development Bank Institute Discussion Paper No.12, Tokyo.

28. Kretschmer B, Peterson S and Ignaciuk A (2008). ‘Integrating Biofuels into the DART Model’. Kiel Working Paper 1472, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, Germany.

29. Kretschmer B, Narita D and Peterson S (2009). ‘The economic effects of the EU biofuel target’, Energy Economics, Vol. 31: 285–294.

30. Lloyd PJ and MacLaren D (2004). ‘Gains and Losses from Regional Trading Agreements: A Survey’. Economic Record, Vol. 80, No. 251: 445-467.

31. Makenete A, Lemmer W and Kupka J (2008). ‘The impact of biofuel production on food security: A briefing paper with particular emphasis on Maize-to-Ethanol production’. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review Volume 11, Issue 2.

32. McDonald S, Robinson S and Thierfelder K (2006). ‘Impact of switching production to bioenergy crops: the switchgrass example’. Energy Economics 28: 243–265.

33. Melillo JM, Gurgel AC, Kickligther DW, Reilly JM, Cronin TW, Felzer BD, Paltsev S, Schlosser CA, Sokolov AP and Wang X (2009). ‘Unintended Environmental Consequences of a Global Biofuels Program’. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Climate Change, Report No. 168, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.

34. Michell D (2008). ‘A note on Rising Food Prices’. Policy Research Working Paper 4682, The World Bank Development Prospects Group.

35. Nigam PS and Singh A (2010). ‘Production of liquid Biofuels from renewable resources’, Progress Energy Combustion Science.

36. Niven KR (2004). ‘Ethanol in gasoline: environmental impacts and sustainability review article’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 9: 535–555.

37. Nolte M (2008). ‘Commercial biodiesel production in South Africa, A preliminary economic feasibility study’. Master of Science Thesis in Chemical Engineering, Department of Process Engineering at the University of Stellenbosch.

38. Nowicki P, van Meijl H, KnierimA, Banse M, Helming J, Margraf O, Matzdorf B, Mnatsakanian R, Reutter M, Terluin I, Overmars K, Verhoog D, Weeger C and Westhoek H (2007). ‘Scenar 2020 – Scenario Study on Agriculture and the Rural World’. European Commission. Brussels: Directorate-General Agriculture and Rural Development.

39. OECD (2003). ‘Agricultural Policies in OECD Countries 2000. Monitoring and Evaluation’. Paris: OECD.

40. OECD (2006). ‘Agricultural market impacts of future growth in the production of biofuels’. Working Party on Agricultural Policies and Markets, AGR/CA/APM(2005)24/FINAL OECD, Paris.

41. Pant H, Brown S, Buetre B and Tulpule V (2000). ‘Measurement and decomposition of welfare changes in GTEM’. Abare Conference Paper, Third annual conference on global economic analysis, Monash University, Melbourne.

42. Perrin KR (2008). ‘Ethanol and Food Prices – Preliminary Assessment’. Agricultural Economics Department Faculty Publications, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.

43. Puppan D (2002). ‘Environmental evaluation of biofuels’, Periodica Polytechnical Social and Management Sciences, Vol. 10: 95–116.

44. Rajagopal D and Zilberman D (2007). ‘Review of environmental, economic and policy aspects of biofuels’. Policy Research Working Paper 4341. Washington: World Bank.

45. Reilly J and Paltsev S (2007). ‘Biomass energy and competition for land’. Report of MIT. Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, No. 145. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

46. Shoven JB and Whalley J (1984). ‘Applied General Equilibrium Models of taxation and International Trade: An Introduction and Survey’. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 23: 1007-1051.

47. Soumonni O and Cozzens S (2008). ‘The potential for biofuel production and use in Africa: an adaptive management approach’. Paper presented in the VI Globelics Conference, September 22-24 2008, Mexico City.

48. Van Gerpen, J (2004). ‘Biodiesel processing and production’, Fuel Processing Technology, Vol. 86: 1097– 1107.

49. Von Braun J (2008). ‘Biofuels, International Food Prices, and the Poor-Testimony to the United States Senate’ Available at http://www.ifpri.org.

50. Von Maltitz G, Haywood L, Mapako M and Brent A (2009). ‘Analysis of opportunities for biofuel production in sub-Saharan Africa. Brief Environment’. available at www.cifor.cgiar.org

51. Whitten GZ (2004). ‘Air quality and ethanol in gasoline’, 9th Annual National Ethanol Conference, Policy and Marketing, Available at http://www.egov.oregon.gov/ENERGY/RENEW/Biomass/docs.

52. World Bank Report (2008). Agriculture for Development. Available at http://www.worldbank.org/prospects.