Internalization of External Costs of Energy Generation in Central and Eastern European Countries

Vojtěch, Máca and Jan, Melichar and Milan, Ščasný (2012): Internalization of External Costs of Energy Generation in Central and Eastern European Countries. Published in: The Journal of Environment & Development , Vol. 21, No. 2 (2012): pp. 181-197.

Abstract

In this article a bottom-up approach to quantification of air pollution externalities from electricity generation is used to show that market-based instruments are not very effective in internalizing these external costs in six CEE countries. Although governments in CEE countries have regulated air emissions by imposing strict command-and-control measures, most of them have also introduced air emission charges and more recently taxes on electricity. We find however that the level of internalization by these two economic instruments is fairly low for existing fossil fired power plants ranging from 3% for coal- and lignite-fuelled plants to 31% for gas-fuelled plants. The picture improves if cross-subsidies for renewable electricity are accounted for but the internalization level is still below air pollution–related external costs, between 9% and 55% for coal- and oil-fired power plants. A substantial over-internalization by these three instruments is however encountered in the case of gas-fired power plants.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: air pollution, Central and Eastern Europe, economic instruments, external costs, internalization
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities ; Redistributive Effects ; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q48 - Government Policy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q52 - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs ; Distributional Effects ; Employment Effects

References

Bickel, P. & Friedrich, R. (2004). ExternE: Externalities of Energy. Methodology 2005 Update. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Blackman, A., & Harrington, W. (2000). The Use of Economic Incentives in Developing Countries: Lessons from International Experience with Industrial Air Pollution. The Journal of Environment & Development, 9(1), 5-44.

Desaigues, B., Ami, D., Bartczak, A., Braun Kohlová, M., Chilton, S., Czajkowski, M., Farreras, V., Hunt, A., Hutchison, M., Jeanrenaud, C., Kaderjak, P., Máca, V., Markiewicz, O., Markowska, A., Metcalf, H., Navrud, S., Nielsen, J.S., Ortiz, R., Pellegrini, S., Rabl, A., Riera, P., Ščasný, M., Stoeckel, M.-E., Szántó, R., Urban, J. (2011). Economic Valuation of Air Pollution Mortality: A 9-Country Contingent Valuation Survey of Value of a Life Year (VOLY). Ecological Indicators, 11(3), 902-910.

Diakoulaki, D., Mirasgedis, S. & Tourkolias, C. (2007). Assessment and Exploitation of Energy-Related Externalities in the Industrial Sector. Energy Policy, 35, 2925-2938.

EcoSenseWeb1.3: http://ecosenseweb.ier.uni-stuttgart.de

European Environment Agency. (2005). Market-Based Instruments for Environmental Policy in Europe. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.

Goulder, L. H., & Parry, I. W. H. (2008). Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(2), 152-174.

Hurley F., Torfs R., Rabl A., Miller B. (2008). A Set of Concentration-Response Functions, Deliverable 3.7 - RS1b/WP3, IP NEEDS - New Energy Externalities Developments for Sustainability, available at http://www.needs-project.org.

Longo, A., & Markandya, A. (2005). Identification of Options and Policy Instruments for the Internalization of External Costs of Electricity Generation, Nota di Lavore 2005-74, Milan: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.

Moldan, B., & Hak, T. (2007). Environment in the Czech Republic: A Positive and Rapid Change. Environmental Science & Technology, 41(2), 359-362.

Muller, N. Z., Mendelsohn, R., & Nordhaus, W. (2011). Environmental Accounting for Pollution in the United States Economy. American Economic Review, 101, 1649-1675.

OECD & IEA (2011). Electricity Information 2011 with 2010 Data. International Energy Agency. Paris.

OECD (2001). Environmentally Related Taxes in OECD Countries: Issues and Strategies. Paris: OECD.

Preiss P. & Klotz V. (2008). EcoSenseWeb V1.3, User`s Manual &“Description of Updated and Extended Draft Tools for the Detailed Site-dependent Assessment of External Costs“, Institut für Energiewirtschaft und Rationelle Energieanwendung (IER), Universität Stuttgart.

Rabl, A. (1998). Mortality Risks of Air Pollution: The Role of Exposure–Response Functions. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 61(1-3), 91-98.

Sandmo, A. (1975). Optimal Taxation in the Presence of Externalities. The Swedish Journal of Economics, 77, 1, 86-98.

Ščasný, M., Píša, V., Pollitt, H., & Chewpreecha, U. (2009). Analysing Macroeconomic Effects of Energy Taxation by Econometric E3ME Model. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, Volume 59, Issue 5, pp. 460-491.

Söderholm, P. (2001). Environmental Policy in Transition Economies: Will Pollution Charges Work? The Journal of Environment & Development, 10(4), 365-390.

Speck, S., McNicholas, J., & Markovic, M. (2001). Environmental Taxes in an Enlarged Europe: An Analysis and Database of Environmental Taxes and Charges in Central and Eastern Europe. The Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe, Szentendre.

Van Regemorter, D. (2008). Assessment of the Macroeconomic Impacts of NEC Scenarios with GEM-E3. Study prepared for the DG Environment, European Commission, April 2008.