Séne, Ligane and Cissé, Momath (2014): Local government spending and multidimensional poverty in Senegal: insight from the fuzzy approach.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_58602.pdf Download (671kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The majority of African countries, included Senegal, continue to face widespread poverty. The objective of poverty reduction is accompanied by a set of initiatives and programs that might be reflected in the government budget allocation. A crucial point is to explore, in a context of severely limited resources, how to optimize budget allocation between different sectors and therefore get higher impact without necessarily much financial resources. In an effort to inform this discussion, this paper examines the linkage between disaggregated government expenditures and poverty using the most recent poverty monitoring survey in Senegal. Unlike most previous studies, our analysis is based on fuzzy set theory in the aim to find a suitable, complete and reliable way of measuring poverty, to overcome the limitations of one-dimensional framework, and better assess the impact of prior government expenditures. High heterogeneity in poverty appears from the decomposition of the overall poverty by location and by household head’s characteristics. The results from the model elucidate that previous government spending in infrastructure and spending on social development and women entrepreneurship yielded some positive impacts on poverty. These results provide useful policy insights for helping to improve the effectiveness of expenditures in reducing poverty.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Local government spending and multidimensional poverty in Senegal: insight from the fuzzy approach |
English Title: | Local government spending and multidimensional poverty in Senegal: insight from the fuzzy approach |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | poverty reduction, fuzzy set, government spending, multidimensional |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy ; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs |
Item ID: | 58602 |
Depositing User: | Ligane Massamba Sene |
Date Deposited: | 16 Sep 2014 08:23 |
Last Modified: | 05 Oct 2019 05:22 |
References: | Allen, S., Badiane, O., Sene, L. and Ulimwengu, J. (2014), Government Expenditures, Health Outcomes and Marginal Productivity of Agricultural Inputs: The Case of Tanzania. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65: 637–662. doi: 10.1111/1477-9552.12063. Atkinson, A.B. 1987. On the measurement of poverty. Econometrica, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 749–64. Badiane, O., and J. Ulimwengu. (2009). The growth–poverty convergence agenda: Optimizing social expenditures to maximize their impact on agricultural labor productivity, growth, and poverty reduction in Africa. Discussion Paper 00906. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute. Badiane, O. and Ulimwengu, J. (2013). Malaria incidence and agricultural efficiency in Uganda. Agricultural Economics, 44(1), 15-23. Barro, R. (1991). Economic Growth in a Cross-section of Countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (2): 407–43. Binswanger, H. P., Khandler, S. R. and Rosenzweig, M. R. (1993). How Infrastructure and Financial Institutions Affect Agricultural Output and Investment in India. Journal of Development Economics 41: 337-66. Brindley, C. (2005). Barriers to women achieving their entrepreneurial potential: Women and Risk. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour, 11(2), 144-61. Cerioli, A. and Zani, S. (1990). A fuzzy approach to the measurement of poverty, in Dagum, C. and Zenga, M. (eds), Income and Wealth Distribution, Inequality and Poverty, Studies in Contemporary Economics, Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 272–84. Cheli, B. and Lemmi, A. (1995). A totally fuzzy and relative approach to the multidimensional analysis of poverty. Economic Notes, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 115–33. Devarajan, S., Swaroop, V. and Zou, H. (1996). The Composition of Public Expenditure and Economic Growth. Journal of Monetary Economics 37: 313–44. Edward Anderson, Paolo de Renzio and Stephanie Levy. (2006). The Role of Public Investment in Poverty Reduction: Theories, Evidence and Methods. Working Paper 263. Overseas Development Institute. Elias, V. (1985). Government expenditures on agriculture and agricultural growth in Latin America. Research Report 50. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute. Fan, S., P. Hazell, and S. Thorat. (1999). Linkages between government spending, growth, and poverty in rural India. Research Report 110. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute. Fan, S., X. Zhang, and N. Rao. (2004). Public expenditure, growth, and poverty reduction in rural Uganda. Development Strategy and Governance Division Discussion Paper No. 4. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute. Foster, J.E. and Shorrocks, A.F. (1988). Inequality and poverty orderings. European Economic Review, vol. 32, nos 2–3, pp. 654–62. Gomanee, K., Morrissey, O., Mosley, P. and Verschoor, A. (2003). Aid, Pro-poor Government Spending and Welfare. CREDIT Research Paper 3. Nottingham: University of Nottingham, CREDIT. Kakwani, N.C. (1995). Measuring poverty with uncertain poverty line. Journal of Income Distribution, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 201–10. Miceli , D. (1998). University of Canberra. National Centre for Social and Economic Modelling. Discussion paper no. 38. Milbourne, R., Otto, G. and Voss, G. (2003). Public Investment and Economic Growth. Applied Economics 35: 527–40. Mitra, A., Varoudakis, A. and Veganzones, M. (1998). Croissance de la Productivité et Efficacité Technique dans L'industrie Manufacturière des Etats de l'Inde. Le Rôle des Infrastructures, Revue Economique, 49 (3): 845–55. Misango, S., and orpha k. Ongiti, O. (2013). Do Women Entrepreneurs Play a Role in Reducing Poverty? A Case in Kenya. International review of management and business Research, vol. 2 issue. 1. Mosley, P., Hudson, J. and Verschoor, A. (2004). Aid, Poverty Reduction and the New Conditionality. Economic Journal 114, June: F217–F243. Pardey, P. G., J. Roseboom, and N. M. Beintema. (1997). Investments in African agricultural research. World Development 25(3): 409–23, March. Sala-i-Martin, X. (1997). I Just Ran Two Million Regressions. American Economic Review 87 (2): 178–83. Sylvia, C., and Pedwell, C. (2008). Women, gender and the informal economy: An assessment of ILO research and suggested ways forward/Sylvia International Labor Office. Geneva: ILO, 2008. Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control. vol. 8, pp. 338–53. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/58602 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Local government spending and multidimensional poverty in Senegal: insight from the fuzzy approach. (deposited 16 Sep 2014 08:23) [Currently Displayed]