Nguyen, Huy (2014): Crop diversification, economic performance and household’s behaviours Evidence from Vietnam.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_59168.pdf Download (818kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study examines economic performances and household’s behaviours in multiple crops farming in Vietnam. Smallholder farming systems in Vietnam is being transformed by integration between cash cropping and main food cropping operations. This transformation into diversified farming systems can affect the economies of scope, technical efficiency, and performances of farms. By using the approach of input distance function, we find the first evidence of both scale and scope economies that have important economic performance implications. There is an existence of substantial technical inefficiency in multiple crops farming, which implies that there may be opportunities to expand crop outputs by eliminating technical inefficiency. Enhancing education and further land reforms are main technical efficiency shifters. We also find the complementarity evidence between family labour and other inputs, except hired labour. Thus, policies that lead to more incentives to invest in crop faming activities should focus on the reduction of input costs.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Crop diversification, economic performance and household’s behaviours Evidence from Vietnam |
English Title: | Crop diversification, economic performance and household’s behaviours Evidence from Vietnam |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | crop diversification, input distance function, elasticity of substitution, stochastic frontier, and technical efficiency |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D13 - Household Production and Intrahousehold Allocation O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes |
Item ID: | 59168 |
Depositing User: | Mr Huy Nguyen |
Date Deposited: | 09 Oct 2014 01:15 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 06:52 |
References: | Agricensus, 2006. Agricultural census and survey, General Statistics Office of Vietnam and Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. Aigner, D.J., Lovell, C.A.K. & Schmidt, P., 1977. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6, pp.21–37. Akram-Lodhi, A.H., 2005. Vietnam’s agriculture : processes of rich peasant accumulation and mechanisms. Journal of Agrarian Change, 5(1), pp.73–116. Atkinson, S.E. & Cornwell, C., & Honerkamp, O., 1999, Measuring and decomposing productivity change: stochastic distance function estimation vs DEA, Working Paper 99-478, Department of Economics, University of Georgia, Athens. Battese, G.E. & Coelli, T.J., 1995. A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data, Empirical Economics, 20, pp.325-332. Baumol, W.J., Panzar, J.C. & Willig, R.D., 1982. Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc, New York. Benjamin, D., 1992. Household composition, labor markets and labor demand: testing for separation in agricultural household models. Econometrica, 60(2), pp.287–322. Blackorby, B.C. & Russell, R.R., 1989. Will the Real Elasticity of Substitution Please Stand Up ? (a comparison of the Allen / Uzawa and Morishima elasticities ). The American Economic Review, 79(4), pp.882–888. Bloomberg News, 2012. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-12/vietnam-s-rice-output-faces-slide-on-crop-switch-southeast-asia.html Brümmer, B., Glauben, T. & Lu, W., 2006. Policy reform and productivity change in Chinese agriculture: A distance function approach. Journal of Development Economics, 81(1), pp.61–79. Chavas, J.-P. & Di Falco, S., 2012. On the Role of Risk Versus Economies of Scope in Farm Diversification With an Application to Ethiopian Farms. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63(1), pp.25–55. Chavas, J.P. & Aliber, M., 1993. An analysis of economic efficiency in agriculture: a nonparametric approach. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 18, pp.1–16. Coelli, T. & Fleming, E., 2004. Diversification economies and specialisation efficiencies in a mixed food and coffee smallholder farming system in Papua New Guinea. Agricultural Economics, 31, pp.229–239. Coelli, T. & Perelman, S., 2000. Technical efficiency of European railways: a distance function approach. Applied Economics, 32(15), pp.1967–1976. Coelli, T.J., 1995. Estimators and hypothesis tests for a stochastic frontier function: A Monte-Carlo analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 6, pp.247–268. Coelli, T.J., 1993. A stochastic frontier production function incorporating a model for technical inefficiency effects, Working Paper in Econometrics and Applied Statistics no 69, Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Armidale. Coelli, T.J., 2000. On the econometric estimation of the distance function representation of the production technology, CORE Discussion Paper 2000/42 (Louvain-la-Neuve: Universite Catholique de Louvain). Coelli, T.J., Prasada, D.S. & Battese, G.E., 1998. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston D’Antoni, J.M., Khanal, A.R. & Mishra, A.K., 2014. Examining labor substitution: does family matter for US cash grain farmers? Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 2(May), pp.273–284. Dao, G. & Lewis, P., 2013. Technical efficiency of annual crop farms in northern Vietnam, Working Paper, available at: www.murdoch.edu.au FAO, 2012. Crop diversification sustainable diets and nutrition, Plant Production and Protection Division, Rome. FAO, 2010. The rice crisis: markets, policies and food security D. Dawe, ed., London, FAO and Earthscan. Rome. Fare, R.S. & Primont, D., 1995. Multi-Output Production and Duality, Theory and Application, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston Fernandez-Cornejo, J. et al., 1992. Dynamic measures of scope and scale economies: an application to German agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74, pp.329–342. Gilbert, J.R., 2014. Wage and employment effects of Malawi’s fertilizer subsidy program, Agricultural Economics, 45, pp.337-353. Grosskopf, S., Hayes, K. & Hirschberg, J., 1995. Fiscal stress and the production of public safety: a distance function approach. Journal of Public Economics, 57, pp.277–296. Hailu, A. & Veeman, T.S., 2000. Environmentally sensitive productivity analysis of the Canadian pulp and paper industry, 1959-1994. Environmental Economics and Management, 40, pp.251–274. Hicks, J.R., 1963. The Theory of Wages 2nd eds., MacMilan, London. Van Hung, P., MacAulay, T.G. & Marsh, S.P., 2007. The economics of land fragmentation in the north of Vietnam. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 51(2), pp.195–211. Irz, X. & Thirtle, C., 2004. Dual Technological Development in Botswana Agriculture: A Stochastic Input Distance Function Approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55(3), pp.455–478. Jolliffe, D., 2004. The impact of education in rural Ghana: examining household labour allocation and returns on and off the farm. Journal of Development Economics, 73(1), pp.287–314. Kim, K. et al., 2012. Specialization, diversification, and productivity: a panel data analysis of rice farms in Korea. Agricultural Economics, 43(6), pp.687–700. Kompas, T., 2004. Market reform, productivity and efficiency in Vietnamese rice production, Kompas, T. et al., 2012. Productivity, net returns, and efficiency : land and market reform in Vietnamese rice production. Land Economics, 88(3), pp.478–495. Kumar, S., 2006. Analysing industrial water demand in India : an input distance function approach. Water Policy, 8, pp.15–29. Kumbhakar, S.S. et al., 2007. Do we estimate an input or output distance function? an application of the mixed approach to European Railways. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 27, pp.87–100. Kumbhakar, S.S. & Lovell, C., 2003. Stochastic Frontier Analysis 2nd ed., Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Le, K.T., 2010. Separation Hypothesis Tests in the Agricultural Household Model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 92(5), pp.1420–1431. Lovell, C.A.K. et al., 1994. Resources and functioning: a new view of inequality in Australia. In W. Eichhorn, ed. Models and Measurement of Welfare Inequality. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Press. Mafoua-Koukebene, E., Hornbaker, R.H. & Sherrick, B.J., 1996. Effects of Government program payments on farm portfolio diversification. Review of Agricultural Economics, 18, pp.281–291. Minot, N. et al., 2006. Income Diversification and Poverty in the Northern Uplands of Vietnam, Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute. Ogundari, K., 2013. Crop diversification and technical efficiency in food crop production: A study of peasant farmers in Nigeria. International Journal of Social Economics, 40(3), pp.267–287. Ogundari, K. & Brümmer, B., 2011. Estimating Technical Efficiency, Input substitution and complementary effects using Output Distance Function: A study of Cassava production in Nigeria. Agricultural Economic Review, 12(2), pp.62–79. Paul, C.J.M., Johnston, W.E. & Frengley, G. a. G., 2000. Efficiency in New Zealand Sheep and Beef Farming: The Impacts of Regulatory Reform. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(2), pp.325–337. Paul, C.J.M. & Nehring, R., 2005. Product diversification, production systems, and economic performance in U.S. agricultural production. Journal of Econometrics, 126(2), pp.525–548. Rahman, S., 2010. Women’s Labour Contribution to Productivity and Efficiency in Agriculture: Empirical Evidence From Bangladesh. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(2), pp.318–342. Rasmussen, S., 2010. Scale efficiency in Danish agriculture: an input distance-function approach. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 37(3), pp.335–367. Ravallion, M. & van de Walle, D., 2006. Does rising landlessness signal success or failure for Vietnam’s agrarian transition? Journal of Development Economics, 87(2), pp.191–209. Robison, L.J. & Barry, P.J., 1987. The competitive firm’s response to risk, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. Shephard, R., 1970. Theory of cost and production function, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Solís, D., Bravo-Ureta, B.E. & Quiroga, R.E., 2009. Technical Efficiency among Peasant Farmers Participating in Natural Resource Management Programmes in Central America. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60(1), pp.202–219. Timmer, C.P., 2014. Food security in Asia and the Pacific: the rapidly changing role of rice. Asia & The Pacific Policy Studies, 1(1), pp.73–90. The Diplomat, 2013. http://thediplomat.com/2013/12/vietnamese-rice-farmers-abandon-their-fields/ Urdy, C., 1996. Gender, agriculture production, and the theory of the household. The Journal of Political Economy, 104(5), pp.1010–1046. Vu, L., 2012. Efficiency of rice farming households in Vietnam. International Journal of Development Issues, 11(1), pp.60–73. Wadud, A. & White, B., 2000. Farm household efficiency in Bangladesh: a comparison of stochastic frontier and DEA methods. Applied Economics, 32, pp.1665–1673. Warr, P. & Yusuf, A.A., 2014. Fertilizer subsidies and food self-sufficiency in Indonesia. Agricultural Economics, 45(5), pp.571–588. Willig, R.D., 1979. Multiproduct Technology and Market Structure. The American Economic Review, 69(2), pp.346–351. Wooldridge, J.M. 2012, Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, 2nd eds, The MIT Press, London. World Bank, 2006. Vietnam: business, Development Report 34474-VN, Hanoi, Vietnam. World Bank, 2007. Accelerating rural development in Vietnam, Hanoi, Vietnam. Available at: www.worldbank.org.vn. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/59168 |