Matteucci, Nicola (2013): Standards, IPR and digital TV convergence: theories and empirical evidence. Forthcoming in:
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_59359.pdf Download (221kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Media convergence presents a few noticeable dimensions, and requests an interdisciplinary research approach. We conduct a long-run analysis of the main initiatives of technological standardization carried out in the realm of “traditional” (cable, satellite and terrestrial) digital TV, focusing on Europe, to assess the technological determinants of its apparent trends to convergence. This analysis inevitably calls into question IPR strategies and policies. In particular, we investigate how private incentives and the public agenda for interoperability have shaped the on-going convergence of the TV sector toward an “IP-based” meta-platform. Despite the widespread usage of open standards and formats, the real potential for interoperability along the digital TV filière has been modest, and mostly limited to the transmission segment. This is mainly due to the strong proprietary features characterizing the TV sector, where viable content production and provision rests on effective control of content IPR. Further, patent portfolio strategies and control of crucial copyrights become increasingly central for competing in the converging TV sector, where former telecom companies, traditional TV operators and new OTT players strive to become gatekeepers of essential layers of the new IP-based delivery platforms. To sum up, while technological opportunities today do enable pervasive media interoperability and affordable convergence at the user-level, private incentives relentlessly push the industry toward standards fragmentation and the construction of walled gardens.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Standards, IPR and digital TV convergence: theories and empirical evidence |
English Title: | Standards, IPR and digital TV convergence: theories and empirical evidence |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | standards, IPR strategies, convergence, DVB, digital TV. |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L12 - Monopoly ; Monopolization Strategies L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L15 - Information and Product Quality ; Standardization and Compatibility L - Industrial Organization > L4 - Antitrust Issues and Policies > L40 - General L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L52 - Industrial Policy ; Sectoral Planning Methods L - Industrial Organization > L8 - Industry Studies: Services > L82 - Entertainment ; Media O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O34 - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital |
Item ID: | 59359 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Nicola Matteucci |
Date Deposited: | 21 Oct 2014 10:26 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 20:47 |
References: | Arthur, B. (1989), “Competing Technologies and Lock-in by Small Historical Events, Economic Journal, Vol. 99, March, pp. 116-131. Besen, S.M., Farrell, J. (1994), “Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 8(2), pp. 117-31. Blind, K. (2004), The Economics of Standards: Theory, Evidence, Policy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. Bresnahan, T.F. Greenstein, S. (1999), “Technological Competition and the Structure of the Computer Industry”, Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 47, pp.1-40. Cave, M. (1997), “Regulating Digital Television in a Convergent World”, Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 21(7), PP. 575-596. Cawley, R.A. (1997), “European Aspects of the Regulation of Pay Television”, Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 21(7), pp. 677-691. Cerri, D., Fuggetta, A. (2007), “Open Standards, Open Formats, and Open Source”, The Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 80, n. 11, pp. 1930-1937. Choi, J.P. (1996), “Do Converters Facilitate the Transition to a New Incompatible Technology? A Dynamic Analysis of Converters”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol.14(6), pp. 825–835. Choi, J.P. (1997), “The Provision of (Two-Way) Converters in the Transition Process to a New Incompatible Technology”, Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 45(2), pp. 139–153. Cowan, R., (1991), “Tortoises and Hares: Choice Among Technologies of Unknown Merit”, Economic Journal, July, pp. 801-814. David, P.A. (1985), “Clio and the Economics of Qwerty”, American Economic Review, Vol. 75(2), pp. 332-337. David, P.A., Greenstein, S. (1990), “The Economics of Compatibility Standards: An Introduction to Recent Research”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol.1(1), pp. 3-41. Drury, G.M., (1999), “Interoperability in Digital Broadcasting Systems”, IEE Colloquium on Digital Television - Where Is It and Where Is It Going? (Ref. No. 1999/072), pp.6/1-6/7. EBU (2004), Comments by the EBU on the Commission Staff Working Paper on the Interoperability of Digital Interactive Television Services, 30/04/2004, available at http://europa.eu. ECCA (2003), Comments on the Commission Staff Working Document on Barriers to Widespread Access to New Services and Applications of the Information Society, 20/02/2003, Brussels. Economides, N. (1996), “The Economics of Networks”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 14(6), pp. 673-699. Eltzroth, C. (2008), “IPR Policy of the DVB Project: Negative Disclosure, FR&ND Arbitration Unless Pool Rules OK, Part I”, J. of IT Standards & Standardization Research, Vol. 6(2),pp. 21-47. Eltzroth, C. (2009), “IPR Policy of the DVB Project: Negative Disclosure, FR&ND Arbitration Unless Pool Rules OK, Part II”, J. of IT Standards and Standardization Research, Vol. 7(2), pp. 1-22. European Commission (2004), On the Interoperability of Digital Interactive Television Services, Communication from the Commission, n. COM 541 final, 30/07/2004, available at http://europa.eu. European Commission (2006), Reviewing the Interoperability of Digital Interactive Television Services Pursuant to Communication COM[2004] 541 of 30 July 2004, Communication from the Commission, n. 37 final, 02/02/2006, available at http://europa.eu. Farrell, J., Saloner, G. (1992), “Converters, Compatibility, and the Control of Interfaces”, Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 40(1), pp. 9-35. Farrell, J., Shapiro, C.(1992), “Standard Setting in High-Definition Television”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, pp. 1-93. Funk, J.L., Methe, D.T. (2001), “Market- and Committee-Based Mechanisms in the Creation and Diffusion of Global Industry Standards: the Case of Mobile Communication”, Research Policy, Vol. 30, pp. 589–610. Gandal, N. (2002), “Compatibility, Standardization and Network Effects: Some Policy Implications”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 18, n.1, pp. 80-91. Gerbarg, D.W.L. (ed.), (1999), The Economics, Technology and Content of Digital TV, Kluwer Academic Publishers: London. Gilbert, R. (2010), “The Essentiality Test for Patent Pools”, in: Dreyfuss, R.C., Zimmerman, D.L., First H. (eds.), Working Within the Boundaries of Intellectual Property. Innovation Policy For The Knowledge Society, OUP: Oxford. Grimme, K. (2002), Digital Television Standardization and Strategies, Artech House: London. Hart, J. (2004), Technology, Television and Competition. The Politics of Digital TV, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge (UK). Hawkins, R. (1999), “The Rise of Consortia in the Information and Communication Technology Industries: Emerging Implications for Policy, Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 23, pp.159-173. Helberger, N. (2005), Controlling Access to Content. Regulating Conditional Access in Digital Broadcasting, Kluwer Law International: The Hague. Jenkins, H. (2006) Convergence Culture, New York University Press: New York. Katz, M., Shapiro, C. (1994), “System Competition and Network Effects”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 8(2), pp. 93-115. Klevorick, A.K. Levin, R.C. Nelson, R.R. Winter, S.G. (1995), “On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities”, Research Policy, Vol.24(2), pp.185-205. Krechmer, K. (2006), “The Meaning of Open Standards”, The International Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research, Vol. 4(1). Lemley, M., Shapiro, C. (2007), “Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking”, Texas Law Review, Vol. 85, pp. 1991-2049. Lerner, J., Tirole, J. (2004), “Efficient Patent Pools”, American Economic Review, Vol. 94(3), pp. 691-711. Matutes C., and P. Regibeau (1996), “A Selective Review of the Economics of Standardization Entry Deterrence, Technological Progress and International Competition”, European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 12(2), pp. 183-209. Matteucci, N. (2004), “Diritti Televisivi, oligopolio ed intervento antitrust nella pay-TV: il caso Telepiù-Stream”, Quaderni di Dipartimento, n. 215, available at: http://econ..univpm.it. Matteucci, N. (2008), “Open Standards and Interoperability in EU Digital TV: Economics and Policy Issues”, Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, Vol. 5(2), pp. 45-70. Matteucci, N. (2009) “Interoperability Provision in NGC: The Case of Italian DTV”, Info, Vol. 11(6), pp.30-50. Matteucci, N. (2010), “Strategies for Digital Television: DTT in Italy”. International Journal on Media Management, Vol.12(3), pp. 159-181. Matteucci, N. (2013), “Lo stato della banda larga in Italia: statistiche, modelli diffusivi e implicazioni di policy", L'industria (n.s.), Anno XXXIV(1), pp.11-50. Moore, G.E. (1965), “Cramming More Components onto Integrated Circuits”, reprinted from Electronics, Vol. 38(8), pp.114 ff.," Solid-State Circuits Society Newsletter, IEEE , vol.11 (5), pp.33-35, Sept. 2006. Negroponte, N. (1995), Being Digital, A.A. Knopf (Random House): New York. Nolan, D. (1997), “Bottlenecks in Pay Television. Impact on Market Development in Europe”, Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 21(7), pp. 597-610. OFCOM (2012), International Communications Market Report 2012. (13 December). Available at: http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/cmr/cmr12/icmr/ICMR-2012.pdf Owen, B. (1999), The Internet Challenge to Television, Harvard university Press: Cambridge(MA). Parsons, P.R., Frieden, R.M. (1998), The Cable and Satellite Television Industries, Allyn & Bacon, Boston (Mass.). PriceWaterhouseCoopers, (2012), “2012 Patent Litigation Study”, available at: http://www.pwc.com/en_US/us/forensic-services/publications/assets/2012-patent-litigation-study.pdf Quayle A. (2012), TV Delivery Evolution: Hybrid TV, Over The Top (Internet) TV and TV Everywhere (Multi-Screen) TV. Status Report and Projections 2012-2017, Alan Quayle business and service development consultancy report. Reimers, U.H. (2006), “DVB-The Family of International Standards for Digital Video Broadcasting”, Proceedings of the IEEE , Vol. 94 (1), pp.173-182. Rochet, J.C., Tirole, J. (2003), “Platform Competition In Two-Sided Markets”, Journal of the European Economic Association, n. 1, pp. 990-1029. Salop S.C. Scheffman, D.T. (1983), “ Raising Rivals' Costs”, American Economic Review, Vol. 73(2), pp. 267-271. Shapiro, C. (2001), “Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard-Setting”, in: Jaffe, A.B., Lerner, J., Stern, S., Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. I, MIT Press: Cambridge. Shapiro, C. Varian, H.R. (1999), Information Rules, Harvard University Press: Cambridge. Siebert, P., (2011), “DVB: Developing global television standards for today and tomorrow”, Telecom World (ITU WT), 2011 Technical Symposium at ITU, 24-27 October, pp.171-175. Stango, V. (2004), “The Economics of Standards Wars”, Review of Network Economics, Vol. 3(1), pp. 1-19. Swann, P. (2010), “The Economics of Standardization: An Update”, Report for the UK Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), Version 2.2, 27 May, available at: http://www.bis.gov.uk/feeds/~/media/ED32CDA672764D7C8AC2F4E323581010.ashx Treacy, P., Lawrance, S. (2008), “FRANDly Fire: are Industry Standards Doing More Harm Than Good?” Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Vol. 3(1), pp.22-29. Van Schooneveld, D. (1996), “Standardization of Conditional Access Systems for Digital Pay Television”, Philips Journal of Research, Vol.50(1-2), pp. 217-225. West, J. (2003), “How Open is Open Enough? Melding Proprietary and Open Source Platform Strategies”, Research Policy, Vol. 32, pp.1259-1285. West, J. (2007), “The Economic Realities of Open Standards: Black, White and Many Shades of Gray”, in: Greenstein, S. and Stango, V. (eds.), (2007) Standards and Public Policy, CUP: Cambridge. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/59359 |