Logo
Munich Personal RePEc Archive

Ethics and the choice of animal advocacy campaigns

Waters, James (2014): Ethics and the choice of animal advocacy campaigns.

[thumbnail of MPRA_paper_59585.pdf]
Preview
PDF
MPRA_paper_59585.pdf

Download (129kB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper examines how different ethical positions view various types of animal advocacy campaigns concerning a product produced using animals. The ethical positions represent common company, social, and animal advocate viewpoints. Working in a market model with a monopolistic supplier, we determine whether the ethical positions support or oppose each campaign, and in what conditions. We describe three easily implemented campaign strategies that combine animal welfare and rights goals.

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact us: mpra@ub.uni-muenchen.de

This repository has been built using EPrints software.

MPRA is a RePEc service hosted by Logo of the University Library LMU Munich.