Measures of income inequality are biased or misinterpreted

Kitov, Ivan (2014): Measures of income inequality are biased or misinterpreted.

Abstract

Considering various measures of personal income and the evolution of the household size distribution we reveal major quantitative inconsistencies in the definition of household inequality. The changing composition of households in the U.S. is the only effect causing the observed increase in Gini coefficient since 1967. When corrected for the actual decrease in the average household size the relevant Gini returns to that of personal incomes. The latter has been hovering in a very narrow range between 0.50 and 0.51 since 1974.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: income inequality
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions

References

Bureau of Economic Analysis (2012). National data. GDP & Personal Income. US Department of Commerce. Retrieved on December 25, 2012 from http://bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm

Census Bureau (2006).Design and Methodology. Current Population Survey. Technical Paper 66, US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration. Retrieved on January 01, 2013 from http://www.census.gov/prod/2006pubs/tp-66.pdf

Census Bureau (2012). Comparability of Current Population Survey Income Data with other Data, US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration. Retrieved on December 25, 2012 from http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/comparability/index.html

Internal Revenue Service (2012). SOI Tax Stats - Individual Statistical Tables by Size of Adjusted Gross Income. Retrieved on December 25, 2012 from http://www.irs.gov/uac/SOI-Tax-Stats---Individual-Statistical-Tables-by-Size-of-Adjusted-Gross-Income