Banerjee, Swapnendu and Sarkar, Mainak (2014): Other regarding principal and moral hazard: the single agent case.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_59654.pdf Download (171kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Using the classic moral hazard problem with limited liability we characterize the optimal incentive contracts when first an other-regarding principal interacts with a self-regarding agent. The optimal contract differs considerably when the principal is ‘inequity averse’ vis-a-vis the self-regarding case. Also the agent is generally (weakly) better-off under an ‘inequity averse’ principal compared to a ‘status seeking’ principal. Then we extend our analysis and characterize the optimal contracts when both other-regarding principal and other-regarding agent interact.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Other regarding principal and moral hazard: the single agent case |
English Title: | Other regarding principal and moral hazard: the single agent case |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Other regarding preferences, self regarding preferences, inequity-averse, status- seeking, optimal contract |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior |
Item ID: | 59654 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Swapnendu Banerjee |
Date Deposited: | 04 Nov 2014 05:50 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 11:16 |
References: | Camerer, C. F., 2003. Behavioral Game Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Dur, R., Glazer, A., 2008. Optimal incentive contracts when workers envy their bosses. Journal of Law Economics and Organization. 24 (1), 120–137. Englmaier, F., 2005. A survey on moral hazard, contracts, and social preferences. In: Agarwal, B., Vercelli, A. (Eds.), Psychology, Rationality and Economic Behaviour: Challenging Standard Assumptions. Palgrave-MacMillan, Hampshire, UK, 125–139. Englmaier, F., Leider, S., 2008. Contractual and organizational structure with reciprocal agents. CESifo Working Paper 2415. Englmaier, F., Wambach, F., 2010. Optimal incentive contracts under inequity aversion. Games and Economic Behaviour. 312–328. Fehr, E., Schmidt, K. M., 1999. A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics. August, 114(3), 817-68. Fehr, E., Schmidt, K. M., 2003. Theories of Fairness and Reciprocity: Evidence and Economic Applications. In: Dewatripont, M., Hansen, L. P., Turnovsky, S. J. (Eds), Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Eighth World Congress, Vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 208–257. Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N. E., Sefton, M. 1994. Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments. Games and Economic Behaviour. Vol. 6, pp. 347–369. Gordon, C., 1994. New Deals: Business, Labor, and Politics in America, 1920–1935. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Guth, W., Schmittberger, R, Schwarze, B., 1982. An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 367-88. Hart, O., Moore, J., 2008. Contracts as reference points. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 123 (1), 1–48. Itoh, H., 2004. Moral Hazard and Other-Regarding Preferences. Japanese Economic Review. Vol 55, No.1, 18-45. Neilson, W. S., Stowe, J., 2003. Incentive Pay for Other-Regarding Workers. mimeo. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/59654 |