Chu, Hsun and Lai, Ching-Chong and Liao, Chih-Hsing (2012): A Note on Environment-dependent Time Preferences. Forthcoming in:
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_59719.pdf Download (454kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this paper we investigate the growth effect of environmental taxes when the time preference is endogenously determined by the environmental quality. We find that if people become more patient due to a cleaner environment, raising the environmental tax may reduce pollution and stimulate growth. Moreover, the Pigouvian principle may be inefficient in the presence of an endogenous time preference.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | A Note on Environment-dependent Time Preferences |
English Title: | A Note on Environment-dependent Time Preferences |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | endogenous time preference; endogenous growth; the Pigouvian tax |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 59719 |
Depositing User: | Mr. Hsun Chu |
Date Deposited: | 06 Nov 2014 16:51 |
Last Modified: | 05 Oct 2019 15:32 |
References: | Agénor P. R. (2010) A theory of infrastructure-led development. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34, 932-950. Ayong Le Kama, A. and K. Schubert (2007) A note on the consequence of an endogenous discounting depending on the environmental quality. Macroeconomic Dynamics 11, 272-289. Barro, R. J. and X. Sala-i-Martin (1992) Public finance in models of economic growth 59. 645-661. Becker, G. S. and C. B. Mulligan (1997) The endogenous determination of time preference. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 729-758. Bento, A. and M. Jacobsen (2007) Ricardian rents, environmental policy and the “double-dividend” hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 53, 17-31. Bovenberg, A. L. and R. A. de Mooij (1994) Environmental levies and distortionary taxation. American Economic Review 84, 1085-1089. Bovenberg, A. L. and R. A. de Mooij, (1997) Environmental tax reform and endogenous growth. Journal of Public Economics 63, 207-237. Bovenberg, A. L. and L. H. Goulder (1996) Optimal environmental taxation in the presence of other taxes: general-equilibrium analyses. American Economic Review 86, 985-1000. Bovenberg, A. L. and S. Smulders (1995) Environmental quality and pollution-augmenting technical change in a two-sector endogenous growth model. Journal of Public Economics 57, 369-391. Bovenberg, A. L. and S. Smulders (1996) Transitional impacts of environmental policy in an endogenous growth model. International Economic Review 37, 861-893. Chang, J. J., J. H. Chen, J. Y. Shieh and C. C. Lai (2009) Optimal tax policy, market imperfections, and environmental externalities in a dynamic optimizing macro model. Journal of Public Economic Theory 11, 623-651. Chang, W. Y., H. F. Tsai and C. C. Lai (1998) Government spending and capital accumulation with endogenous time preference. Canadian Journal of Economics 31, 624-645. Chen, J. H., C. C. Lai and J. Y. Shieh (2003) Anticipated environmental policy and transitional dynamics in an endogenous growth model. Environmental and Resource Economics 25, 233-254. Epstein, L. G. (1987) A simple dynamic general equilibrium model. Journal of Economic Theory 41, 68-95. Fullerton, D. and S. R. Kim (2008) Environmental investment and policy with distortionary taxes, and endogenous growth. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 56, 141-154. Hartwick, J. M. (1991) Degradation of environmental capital and national accounting procedures. European Economic Review 35, 642-649. Heijdra, B. J. (2009) Foundations of Modern Macroeconomics. 2nd Edition, Oxford University Press, New York. Hettich, F. (1998) Growth effect of a revenue-neutral environmental tax reform. Journal of Economics 67, 287-316. Itaya, J. (2008) Can environmental taxation stimulate growth? The role of indeterminacy in endogenous models with environmental externalities. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 32, 1156-1180. Kam, E. (2005) A note on time preference and the Tobin Effect. Economics Letters 89, 127-132. Lawrence, E. C. (1991) Poverty and the rate of time preference: Evidence from panel data. Journal of Political Economy 99, 54-75. Ligthart, J. E. and F. van der Ploeg (1994) Pollution, the cost of public funds and endogenous growth. Economics Letters 46, 351-361. Liu A. A. (2013) Tax evasion and optimal environmental taxes. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 66, 656-670. Lucas, R. E., Jr. (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22, 3-24. Lucas, R. E., Jr. and N. L. Stokey (1984) Optimal growth with many consumers. Journal of Economic Theory 32, 139-171. Mohsin, M. (2004) Exchange rate policies and endogenous time preference: A dynamic analysis of a small open economy. Economics Letters 82, 195-203. Nakada, M. (2004) Does environmental policy necessarily discourage growth? Journal of Economics 81, 249-275. Nakada, M. (2010) Environmental tax reform and growth: Income tax cuts or profits tax reduction. Environmental and Resource Economics 47, 549-565. Nairay, A. (1984) Asymptotic behavior and optimal properties of a consumption- investment model with variable time preference. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 7, 283-313. Obstfeld, M. (1990) Intertemporal dependence, impatience, and dynamics. Journal of Monetary Economics 26, 45-75. Ogaki, M. and A. Atkenson (1997) Rate of time preference, intertemporal elasticity of substitution, and level of wealth. Review of Economics and Statistics 79, 564–572. Ono, T. (2003a) Environmental tax policy in a model of growth cycles. Economic Theory 22, 141-168. Ono, T. (2003b) Environmental tax policy and long-run economic growth. Japanese Economic Review 54, 203-217. Ono, T. (2007) Growth and welfare effects of an environmental tax-based public pension reform. Japanese Economic Review 58, 362-381. Palivos, T., P. Wang and J. Zhang (1997) On the existence of balanced growth equilibrium. International Economic Review 38, 205-223. Pautrel, X. (2012) Environmental policy, education and growth: A reappraisal when lifetime is finite. Macroeconomic Dynamics 16, 661-685. Pittel, K. (2002) Sustainability and Endogenous Growth. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Pommeret, A. and K. Schubert (2009) Abatement technology adoption under uncertainty. Macroeconomic Dynamics 13, 493-522. Prieur, F. and T. Bréchet (2013) Can education be good for both growth and the environment? Macroeconomic Dynamics 17, 1135-1157. Ricci, F. (2007) Environmental policy and growth when inputs are differentiated in pollution intensity. Environmental and Resource Economics 38, 285-310. Romer, P. (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94, 1002-1037. Samwick, A. A. (1998) Discount rate homogeneity and social security reform. Journal of Development Economics 57, 117–146. Smulders, S. (1995) Entropy, environment and endogenous economic growth. International Tax and Public Finance 2, 319-340. Smulders, S. and R. Gradus (1996) Pollution abatement and long-term growth. European Journal of Political Economy 12, 505-532. Turnovsky, S. J. (2000) Methods of Macroeconomic Dynamics. 2nd Edition, MIT press, Cambridge. Uzawa, H. (1963) On a two-sector model of economic growth II. Review of Economic Studies 30, 105-118. Uzawa, H. (1968) Time preference, the consumption function, and optimum asset holdings. In John N. Wolfe (ed.), Value, Capital and Growth: Papers in Honour of Sir John Hicks, pp. 485–504. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. van Ewijk, C. and S. van Wijnbergen (1995) Can abatement overcome the conflicts between the environment and economic growth? De Economist 143, 197-216. van Zon, A. and I. H. Yetkiner (2003) An endogenous growth model with embodied energy-saving technical change. Resource and Energy Economics 25, 81-103. Vella, E., E. V. Dioikitopoulos and S. Kalyvitis (2014) Green spending reforms, growth and welfare with endogenous subjective discounting. Macroeconomic Dynamics, forthcoming. Viscusi W. K., J. Huber and J. Bell (2008) Estimating discount rates for environmental quality from utility-based choice experiments. Journal of Risk Uncertainty 37, 199-220. Weitzman, M. L. (1994) On the “environmental” discount rate. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26, 200-209. Williams III, R. C. (2002) Environmental tax interactions when pollution affects health or productivity. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44, 261-270. Williams III, R. C. (2003) Health effects and optimal environmental taxes. Journal of Public Economics 87, 323-335. Yanase, A. (2011) Impatience, pollution, and indeterminacy. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 35, 1789-1799. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/59719 |