Yao, Tao (2015): 房产税制度创新路径研究:基于财富公平分配目标.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_61172.pdf Download (174kB) | Preview |
Abstract
On whether property taxes are progressive, there are three different views. Through comparative analysis ,it is found that the view is more persuasive that property taxes are progressive. In our current socio-economic environment, property tax reform can effectively improve the unfair situation of the distribution field. It isn’t appropriate that Raising financial income and controlling housing price are the main objective of property tax reform. Narrowing the gap between the rich and the poor should be designed as the most important goal of property tax system. The other two goals are in a secondary position. The general idea of property tax reform is to promote fair distribution of wealth by the means of moderate tax base and tax rate on the condition thar overall burden on taxpayers is roughly constant. It is necessary that system innovate in the following areas: (1) bringing the rural areas into the scope of taxation; (2) the establishment of differential rates; (3) the amount of the local average price in the last two years times 35 square meters per capita is exempt from tax; (4) it is prior that property taxes are usded to construct security housing.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | 房产税制度创新路径研究:基于财富公平分配目标 |
English Title: | Path of the Property Taxes Institution Innovation: Based on the Objective of Equitable Distribution of Wealth |
Language: | Chinese |
Keywords: | Property Tax Reform,Fair Distribution of Wealth,Institution Innovation |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H24 - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies |
Item ID: | 61172 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Tao Yao |
Date Deposited: | 01 Feb 2015 14:27 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 19:14 |
References: | [1]陈建东.我国城镇居民财产性收入的研究[J].财贸经济,2009,(1):65-69. [2]陈小安.房产税的功能、作用与制度设计框架[J].税务研究, 2011,(4):30-34. [3]龚刚敏.论物业税对房地产价格与政府行为的影响[J].税务研究, 2005,(5):43-45. [4]建设部政策研究中心课题组.全面建设小康社会居住目标研究[J].经济研究参考, 2005,(43):2-18. [5]况伟大.住房特性、物业税与房价[J].经济研究, 2009,(4):151-160. [6]梁运文, 霍震, 刘凯.中国城乡居民财产分布的实证研究[J].经济研究, 2010,(10):33-47. [7]王智波.房产税改革中的公平问题研究[J].中国经济问题,2011,(3):85-89. [8]徐静, 岳希明.我国个人所得税的居民收入分配效应 [C]// 李实,(日)佐藤宏,(加)史泰丽等.中国收入差距变动分析.北京:人民出版社,2013:403-422。 [9]杨文彦. 国家统计局首次公布2003至2012年中国基尼系数[EB/OL]. http://politics.people.com.cn/n/2013/0118/c1001-20253603.html,2013-01-18. [10]中德安联人寿保险有限公司.中国富裕人士财富报告[EB/OL]. http://www.allianz.com.cn/company-news-info.php?newsid=19649,2011-12-06. [11]Cebula,R. J. Foley M , Houmes R. Property Tax Capitalization within a National Historic District versus Property Tax Capitalization outside that National Historic District:Another Application of the Tiebout Hypothesis[J]. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2011, 3(4): 14-21. [12]Fisher ,R. C. State and Local Public F1nance[M]. Mason: Thomson Higher Education Press, 2007. [13]Hamilton, B. W. Zoning and Property Taxation in a System of Local Governments[J]. Urban Studies, 1975, 12(2): 205-211. [14]Mieszkowski,P. The Property Tax: An Excise Tax or a Profits Tax?[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 1972, 1(1): 73-96. [15]Netzer ,D. Economics of the Property Tax[M]. Washington DC: Brookings Institution , 1966 . [16]Oates,W. E. The Efects of Property Taxes and Local Public Spending on Property Values:An Empirical Study of Tax Capitalization and the Tiebout Hypothesis[J].Journal of Political Economy,1969, 177(6): 957-971. [17]Simon ,H. A .The Incidence of a Tax on Urban Real Property[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1943 , 59: 398-420. [18]Smith, B. Intrajurisdictional Segmentation of Property Tax Burdens: Neighborhood Inequities Across an Urban Sphere[J]. The Journal of Real Estate Research , 2008, 30(2): 207-223. [19]Tiebout, C. M. A Pure Theory of Local Expenditure[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1956, 64(5): 416-424. [20]World Bank. World Development Indicators[M]. Washington, D.C:Green Press, 2011. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/61172 |