Vinokurov, Evgeny and Kulik, Sergey and Spartak, Andrey and Yurgens, Igor (2014): Two Integration Projects in Europe: Dead End of Struggle. Published in:
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_61636.pdf Download (286kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The report represents the first part of a project targeting the problems and prospects of two economic integration projects in Greater Europe — the European project (European Union) and the Eurasian project (Russia, the Customs Union and the Eurasian Economic Union). This topic is particularly relevant in light of the Ukrainian crisis, the signing of Association Agreements with the EU by Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine, as well as the looming threat of „continental fracture‟.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Two Integration Projects in Europe: Dead End of Struggle |
English Title: | Two Integration Projects in Europe: Dead End of Struggle |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | economic integration, Europe, Russia, Customs Union, Eurasian Economic Union, Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy |
Item ID: | 61636 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Evgeny Vinokurov |
Date Deposited: | 04 Feb 2015 05:16 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 14:00 |
References: | Centre for Integration Studies (2012) Comprehensive assessment of the macroeconomic effects of various forms of deep economic integration of Ukraine and the member states of the Customs Union and the Common Economic Space. Report no.1. Eurasian Development Bank: St. Petersburg. CEPR (2013) Reducing Transatlantic Barriers to Trade and Investment: An Economic Assessment. Project Report prepared by Francois, J., Manchin, M., Norberg, H., Pindyuk, O., Tomberger, P. under implementing Framework Contract TRADE10/A2/A16. CEPS (2006) The Prospect of Deep Free Trade Between the European Union and Ukraine. Report prepared by the Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), J.Francois, M.Manchin, H.Norberg, O.Pindyuk, P.Tomberger (2013) Reducing Trans-Atlantic Barriers to Trade and Investment, European Commission and CEPR. Fox, A., Francois, J.,Londono-Kent, P. (2003)Measuring border costs and their impact on trade flows: the United States-Mexican trucking case, https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/download/1492.pdf. Grossman, G., Helpman E. (1995) The policy of free-trade agreements, American Economic Review, 85,680 – 690. Libman, A., Vinokurov, E. (2011) Is it really different? Patterns of regionalisation in post-Soviet Central Asia, Post-Communist Economies, 23, 469–492. Panagariya, A. (2000) Preferential Trade Liberalization: The Traditional Theory and New Developments,Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 287–331. Tochitskaya, I., de Souza L.V. (2008) Trade Relations between an Enlarged EU and the Russian Federation, and its Effects in Belarus, Economic Changes and Restructuring, Vol. 42, No. 1-2, pp. 1-24. Venables, A. (2003) Winners and losers from regional integration agreements, Economic Journal,113,747–761 Vinokurov E., Libman A. (2012) Eurasian Integration: Challenges of Transcontinental Regionalism. Basingtoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. World Bank (2005) From Disintegration to Reintegration: Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union in International Trade, Washington, DC: World Bank Publications. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/61636 |