Samuelson and the Non-Substitution Theorem: Some Methodological Remarks

Akhabbar, Amanar (2013): Samuelson and the Non-Substitution Theorem: Some Methodological Remarks. Published in:

Abstract

With his revealed preference theory (RPT), Samuelson intended to offer “operational” foundations to neoclassical consumer theory by getting rid of unobservable or ill-conceived psychological arguments like, especially, introspection. According to Samuelson, RPT is operational inasmuch as utility functions are now based only on observable elements, namely consumed bundles of goods. In this article, we show that the same methodological process was implicitly applied by Samuelson to neoclassical production theory, and especially the production function. After defining and discussing Samuelson’s operationism, we offer a methodological interpretation of Samuelson’s “non-substitution theorem” (NST) as an operational theorem. We aim at showing that the same methodological process rules RPT and NST: while in RPT observable elements are bundles of goods consumed, in NST these elements are bundles of inputs consumed so as to measure technical coefficients; from observable choices by consumers and producers, one derives the corresponding behavioral or technological function, respectively the utility function and the production function. Therefore, both functions are operational concepts that offer operational foundations to both standard microeconomic analysis of consumption through indifference curves (deduced from the utility function), and to analysis of production through isoquants (deduced from the production function). Although Samuelson’s application of his operational-methodology-to-consumer theory has been studied at length, its application to production theory has been neglected.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Samuelson; methodology; operationalism; operationism; revealed preference theory; non substitution theorem; Leontief; input-output models
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B3 - History of Economic Thought: Individuals

References

Akhabbar, Amanar. 2007a. La fonction de production et la signification opérationnelle des théories : une alternative à la méthode des tests ?. In Berthoud, Delmas and Demals (eds.), Y-a-t-il des lois en économie?. Lille: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, 371-389.

Akhabbar, Amanar. 2007b. Leontief et l’économie comme science empirique : la signification opérationnelle des lois. Économies et Sociétés, série PE, 39, 1745-1788.

Autume, Antoine d’. 1990. Le rôle intime de la demande dans la production jointe. In Richard Arena and Jacques-Laurent Ravix (eds.), Sraffa, trente ans après. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France and CNRS-Université de Nice.

Arrow, Kenneth J. 1951. Alternative proof of the substitution theorem for Leontief models in the general case. In Koopmans (ed.) (1951), 155-164.

Arrow, Kenneth. 1983. General Equilibrium, Collected papers of K.J. Arrow, Vol.2.

Blaug, Mark. 1980. The Methodology of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bridel, Pascal. 1999. Homo oeconomicus: Rerum cognoscere causas? ou du principe de rationalité comme instrument de connaissance en théorie économique. Revue européenne des sciences sociales, XXXVII-113, 149-167.

Bridel, Pascal, and Salvat Christophe. 2004. Reason and Sentiments: Review of Emma Rothschild's Economic Sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet and the Enlightenment. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 11, 131-145.

Bridel, Pascal. 2007. Le rôle de la mesure dans la construction de l'objet théorique et comment l'objet théorique devient...mesure. Revue européenne des sciences sociales, Special Issue, 143-152.

Bridgman, Percy Williams. 1927. The Logic of Modern Physics. New York, NY: MacMillan.

Bridgman, Percy Williams. 1938. Operational Analysis. Philosophy of Science, 5-2, 114-131.

Carnap, Rudolf. 1936. Testability and meaning. Philosophy of Science, 3-4, 419-471.

Carnap, Rudolf. 1937. Testability and meaning. Philosophy of Science, 4-1, 1-40.

Cohen, Joshua. 1995. Samuelson’s operationalist-descriptivist thesis. Journal of Economic Methodology, 2-1, 53-78.

Dantzig, George. 1949. Programming of interdependent activities: II Mathematical Model. Econometrica, 17-3/4, 200-211.

Dantzig, George, and Marshall K. Wood. 1949. Programming of interdependent activities: I General discussion. Econometrica, 17-3/4, 193-199.

Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas. 1951. Some properties of a generalized Leontief model. In Koopmans (ed.) (1951), 165-173.

Hands, Wade. 2008. Introspection, revealed preference, and neoclassical economics: a critical response to Don Ross on the Robbins-Samuelson argument pattern. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 30-4, 453-478.

Koopmans, Tjalling Charles (ed.). 1951. Activity Analysis. Cowles Commission for Research in Economics, Monograph 13.

Koopmans, Tjalling Charles. 1947. Measurement without theory. The Review of Economic Statistics, 29-3, 161-172. Koopmans, Tjalling Charles. 1951a. Introduction. In Koopmans (ed.) (1951), 1-12.

Koopmans, Tjalling Charles. 1951b. Alternative proof of the substitution theorem for Leontief models in the case of three industries. In Koopmans (ed.) (1951), 147-154.

Leontief, Wassily. 1937. Interrelations of prices, output, savings and investment. The Review of Economic Statistics, 19-3, 109-132.

Leontief, Wassily. 1944. Output, employment, consumption, and investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 58-2, 290-314.

Leontief, Wassily. 1949b. Structural matrices of national economics. Econometrica, 17, Supplement: Proceedings of the International Statistical Conferences, 273-282.

McKenzie, Lionel. 2002. Classical General Equilibrium Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Mongin, Philippe. 2000. Les préférences révélées et la formation de la théorie du consommateur. Revue Économique, 51-5, 1125-1152.

Pasinetti, Luigi L. 1977. On ‘non-substitution’ in production models. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1-4, 389-394.

Salvadori, Neri. 1987. Non-substitutions theorems. In John Eatwell, Murray Milgate, Peter Newman (eds.), The New Palgrave, A Dictionary of Economics.

Samuelson, Paul A. 1938a. The empirical implications of utility analysis. Econometrica, 6-4, 344-356.

Samuelson, Paul A. 1938b. A note on the pure theory of consumer's behavior. Economica, 5-17, 61-71.

Samuelson, Paul A. 1938c. The numerical representation of ordered classifications and the concept of utility. The Review of Economic Studies, 6-1, 65-70.

Samuelson, Paul A. 1947. Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Samuelson, Paul A. 1948. Consumption theory in terms of revealed preference. Economica, 15-November, 243-253.

Samuelson, Paul A. 1950. The problem of integrability in utility theory. Economica, 17-November, 355-85.

Samuelson, Paul A. 1953. Consumption theorems in terms of overcompensation rather than indifference comparisons. Economica, 20-February, 1-9.

Samuelson, Paul A. 1951. Abstract of a theorem concerning substitutability in open Leontief models. In Koopmans (ed.) (1951), 142-146.

Samuelson, Paul A. 1955. Professor Samuelson on operationalism in economic theory: comment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69-2, 310-314.

Samuelson, Paul A. 1957. Wages and interest: a modern dissection of Marxian economic models. The American Economic Review, 47-6, 884-912.

Samuelson, Paul A. 1959a. A modern treatment of the Ricardian economy: I. The pricing of goods and of labor and land services. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 73-1, 1-35.

Samuelson, Paul A. 1959b. A modern treatment of the Ricardian economy II: capital and interest aspects of the pricing process. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 73-2, 217-231.

Samuelson, Paul A. 1961. A new theorem on non-substitution. In Johan Akerman and Hugo Hegelan (eds.), Money, Growth and Methodology, Lund: CWK Gleerup.

Samuelson, Paul A. 1962. Economists and the history of ideas. The American Economic Review, 52-1, 1-18.

Samuelson, Paul A. 1972. Maximum principle in analytical economics. The American Economic Review, 62-3, 249-162.

Samuelson, Paul A. 1978. The canonical classical model of political economy. Journal of Economic Literature, 16-4, 1415-1434.

Samuelson, Paul A. 1998. How Foundations came to be. Journal of Economic Literature, 36-3, 1375-1386.

Schultz, Henry. 1928. Rational economics. The American Economic Review, 18-4, 643-648.

Walras, Léon. 1874-1877. Éléments d’économie politique pure. OEC, vol. VII. Paris: Economica, 1986.

Weintraub, Roy. 1983. On the existence of a competitive equilibrium: 1930-1954. The Journal of Economic Literature, 21-1, 1-39.