Experimental Economics in Virtual Reality

Gürerk, Özgür and Bönsch, Andrea and Braun, Lucas and Grund, Christian and Harbring, Christine and Kittsteiner, Thomas and Staffeldt, Andreas (2014): Experimental Economics in Virtual Reality.

Abstract

Recent developments in virtual reality (VR) technology have the potential to revolutionize the way economists do experimental research. With Oculus’ light and affordable head mounted display (HMD) human subjects can literally move and use objects in virtual spaces and interact with others. This technology as well as surround-screen projection systems like CAVEs (Cruz-Neira et al. 1994), allow the experimenter to observe economically relevant behavior and social interaction in a highly immersive and at the same time tightly controlled virtual environment. More than other disciplines, economics focuses on the evaluation of counterfactual scenarios which help to analyze strategic decisions and their efficiency effects. In this note, by means of three examples, we illustrate how experiments in highly IVEs can add value to experimental economics and benefit economic research.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: experimental economics; virtual reality; immersive virtual environment; risk preferences; real effort; avatar; reflection problem; experimental methodology
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C90 - General

References

Bainbridge, W. S. 2007. The scientific research potential of virtual worlds. Science 317, 472–476.

Blascovich, J., Loomis, J., Beall, A.C., Swinth, K.R., Hoyt, C.L., and Bailenson, J.N. 2002. Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology. Psychol. Inq. 13, 103–124.

Cruz-Neira, C., Sandin, D. J. & DeFanti, T. A. 1993. Surround-screen projection-based virtual reality: the design and implementation of the CAVE. Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH ’93 Conference on Computer Graphics, 135–142.

Chesney, T., Chuah, S.-H., & Hoffmann, R. 2009. Virtual world experimentation: An exploratory study. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72(1), 618–635.

Duffy, John. Trust in Second Life. 2011. Southern Economic Journal 78, 53-62.

Falconer CJ, Slater M, Rovira A, King JA, Gilbert P, et al. 2014. Embodying Compassion: A Virtual Reality Paradigm for Overcoming Excessive Self-Criticism. PLoS ONE 9(11): e111933.

Fiore, S. M., Harrison, G. W., Hughes, C. E. & Rutström, E. E. 2009. Virtual experiments and environmental policy - Frontiers of Environmental and Resource Economics. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 57: 65–86.

Füllbrunn, S., Richwien, K. & Sadrieh, A. 2011. Trust and Trustworthiness in Anonymous Virtual Worlds. J. Media Econ. 24, 48–63.

Gürerk, Ö., Grund, C., Harbring, C., Kittsteiner, T., Staffeldt., A., 2014. Real Effort on the Holodeck: Experimental Economics in Virtual Reality. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2544739.

Harrison, G. W. & List, J. A. 2004. Field Experiments. J. Econ. Lit. 42, 1009–1055.

Manski, C. F. Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem. 1993. Rev. Econ. Stud. 60, 531–542.

Sanchez-Vives, M. V. & Slater, M. 2005. From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 332–339.

Schmid, P. C. & Schmid Mast, M. 2013. Power increases performance in a social evaluation situation as a result of decreased stress responses. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 43, 201–211.

Staum Casasanto, L., Jasmin, K., & Casasanto, D. 2010. Virtually accommodating: Speech rate accommodation to a virtual interlocutor. In S. Ohlsson, & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 127-132. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

Twieg, P. B. and McCabe, K. A. 2014. The Determinants of Territorial Property Rights in a Spatial Commons Experiment. SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2503260.