Contradictory Approaches? – On Realism and Constructivism in the Social Sciences Research on Risk, Technology and the Environment

Metzner-Szigeth, Andreas (2009): Contradictory Approaches? – On Realism and Constructivism in the Social Sciences Research on Risk, Technology and the Environment. Published in: Futures – The Journal of Policy, Planning and Futures Studies , Vol. 41, No. 2 (1 March 2009): 156 -170.

Abstract

This article discusses approaches to researching the risk-problems of industrial societies. It examines why the risk-constructivism neglects questions of the material production of risks in favor of questions of their communicative construction, while the risk-realism does it the other way round. Subsequently the possibilities of a synthesis of both approaches are being considered. The societal functions of risk-constructions are accordingly not limited to their efficacy in the sphere of social communication processes. They lie as well in the field of regulation of the metabolism of societies and their ecological environment. The validity of risk-constructions is consequently not only bound to their cultural weightiness, whether one believes in them or not, but to their capacity to manage realities, measured by their ability to bring expectations in accordance with events. Risk-constructions are not only transformed in the milieu of discourses, but also in the context of social practices which give the opportunity to acquire experiences and to perform learning processes in order to optimize risk-constructions as regulative instruments.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: environmental sociology, ecological economics, risk research, climate change
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q01 - Sustainable Development; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology

References

[1] I. Niiniluoto, Realism, relativism, and constructivism, Synthese 89 (1) (1991) 135–162.

[2] J.A. Bradbury, The policy implications of differing concepts of risk, Science, Technology, and Human Values 14 (4) (1989) 380–399.

[3] O. Renn, Concepts of risk: a classification, in: S. Krimsky, D. Golding (Eds.), Social Theories of Risk, Praeger, Westport, CT, London, 1992, pp. 53–79.

[4] R. Murphy, The sociological construction of science without nature, Sociology 28 (4) (1994) 957–974.

[5] K.J. Tierney, Toward a critical sociology of risk, Sociological Forum 14 (2) (1999) 215–242.

[6] S. Yearly, The social construction of environmental problems: a theoretical review and some not-very-Herculean labors, in: R.E. Dunlap, F.H. Buttel, P. Dickens, A. Gijswit (Eds.), Sociological Theory and the Environment: Classical Foundations and Contemporary Insights, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, 2001, pp. 274–286.

[7] D. Duclos, Effets nocifs des discours sur les dangers – Le grand the´aˆtre des experts du risque, Le Monde diplomatique (June) (2002) 24–25.

[8] A. Wildavsky, But is it true? – A Citizen’s guide to environmental health and safety issues, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, London, 1995.

[9] R. Bailey (Ed.), Global Warming and Other Eco Myths – How the Environmental Movement Uses False Science to Scare Us to Death, Prima Publishing, Roseville, CA, 2002.

[10] B. Lomborg, The Skeptical Environmentalist – Measuring the Real State of the World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.

[11] D. Maxeiner, M. Miersch, Öko-Optimismus, Metropolitan, Düsseldorf, 1996.

[12] OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), Emerging risks in the 21st century – an agenda for action. Paris: OECD, 2003. <http:// www.oecd.org/dataoecd/20/23/37944611.pdf>.

[13] I. Prigogine, I. Stengers, Order Out of Chaos – Man’s New Dialogue with Nature, Bantam Books, New York, 1984.

[14] T.H. Davenport, J.C. Beck, The attention economy: understanding the new currency of business, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 2001.

[15] J.L. Walker, The diffusion of knowledge policy communities and agenda setting: the relationship of knowledge and power, in: J.E. Tropman, M. Dluhy, R.M. Lind (Eds.), In New Strategic Perspectives on Social Policy, Pergamon Press, New York, 1981, pp. 75–96.

[16] M.A. Hajer, The politics of environmental discourse, in: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 1995.

[17] R. Bailey (Ed.), The True State of the Planet, Free Press, New York, London, 1995.

[18] L.R. Brown, J. Abramovitz (Eds.), State of the World 1996 – A Worldwatch Institute Report on Progress Toward a Sustainable Society, Norton & Company, New York, London, 1996.

[19] German Advisory Council on Global Change (WBGU), World in transition: ways towards global environmental solutions (Annual Report 1995), Springer, Berlin, 1996.

[20] J.P. Bruce, H. Lee, E.F. Haites (Eds.), Climate Change 1995 – The Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.

[21] B. Tonn, The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: a global scale transformative initiative, Futures 39 (5) (2007) 614–618.

[22] A. Evers, H. Nowotny, U¨ ber den Umgang mit Unsicherheit – Die Entdeckung der Gestaltbarkeit von Gesellschaft, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1987.

[23] C. Lau, Social conflicts about the definition of risk: the role of science, in: N. Stehr, R.V. Ericson (Eds.), The Culture and Power of Knowledge – Inquiries into the Contemporary Societies, de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 1992, pp. 235–248.

[24] U. Beck, The Risk Society – Towards a New Modernity (translated by Mark Ritter), Sage, London, 1992.

[25] U. Beck, World Risk Society, Blackwell, Cambridge, 1999.

[26] M. Redclift, C. Sage, Global environmental change and global inequality, International Sociology 13 (4) (1998) 499–516.

[27] M. Kamppinen, M. Wilenius, Risk landscapes in the era of social transition, Futures 33 (3–4) (2001) 307–317.

[28] P. Weingart, A. Engels, P. Pansegrau, Risks of communication: discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media, Public Understanding of Science 9 (3) (2000) 261–283.

[29] B. Glassner, The Culture of Fear – Why Americans are Afraid of the Wrong Things, Basic Books, New York, 2003. [30] G. Easterbrook, The Progress Paradox – How Life Gets Better While People Feel Worse, Random House, New York, 2003.

[31] A. Rapoport, Decision Theory and Decision Behaviour – Normative and Descriptive Approaches, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Boston, London, 1989.

[32] R.B. Brandom, Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, London, 2000.

[33] D. Guggenheim, An Inconvenient Truth (starring Al Gore), Paramount Classics, USA, 2006.

[34] M. Crichton, State of Fear, Harper Collins, London, 2004.

[35] P.C. Stern, O.R. Young, D. Druckman (Eds.), Global Environmental Change – Understanding the Human Dimensions, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1992.

[36] F.H. Buttel, P.J. Taylor, Environmental Sociology and Global Environmental Change: A Critical Assessment, in: M. Redclift, T. Benton (Eds.), Social Theory and the Global Environment, Routledge, London, New York, 1994, pp. 228–255.

[37] H. von Storch, N. Stehr, Climate change in perspective – our concerns about global warming have an age-old resonance, Nature 405 (8 June) (2000) 615.

[38] P.J. Michaels, R.C. Balling, The Satanic Gases: Clearing the Air about Global Warming, Cato Institute, Washington, DC, 2000.

[39] K. Trenberth, Uncertainty in hurricanes and global warming, Science 308 (2005) 1753–1754.

[40] W. van den Daele, Scientific evidence and the regulation of technical risks – twenty years of demythologizing the experts, in: N. Stehr, R.V. Ericson (Eds.), The Culture and Power of Knowledge – Inquiries into the Contemporary Societies, de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 1992, pp. 323–340.

[41] M. Douglas, A. Wildavsky, Risk and Culture, 2nd edition, University of California Press, Berkley, Los Angeles, London, 1988.

[42] N.N., Sag mir wo die Ängste sind – Umfrage: Ist unser Dasein heute riskanter? Geo-Wissen (Special Issue Risiko – Chancen und Katastrophen) 1 (März) (1992), Gruner & Jahr, Hamburg, pp. 86–91.

[43] C. Azar, J. Holmberg, K. Lindgren, Methodological and ideological options – socio-ecological indicators for sustainability, Ecological Economics 18 (2) (1996) 2–7.

[44] P. Slovic, Perception of risks, Science 236 (4799) (1987) 280–285.

[45] J.A. Hannigan, Environmental Sociology – A Social Constructionist Perspective, Routledge, London, New York, 1995.

[46] B.B. Johnson, V.T. Covello (Eds.), The Social and Cultural Construction of Risk – Essays on Risk Selection and Perception, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, 1987.

[47] M. Thompson, R. Ellis, A. Wildavsky, Cultural Theory, Westview Press, Colorado, Oxford, 1990.

[48] S. Rayner, Cultural theory and risk analysis, in: S. Krimsky, D. Golding (Eds.), Social Theories of Risk, Praeger, Westport, CT, London, 1992, pp. 83–115.

[49] O. Renn, B. Rohrmann (Eds.), Cross-Cultural Risk Perception – A Survey of Empirical Studies, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Boston, 2000.

[50] R.E. Dunlap, From environmental to ecological problems, in: C. Calhoun, G. Ritzer (Eds.), Social Problems, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1993, pp. 707–738.

[51] J.B. Opschoor, R. Wetering (Eds.), Towards Environmental Performance Indicators based on the Notion of Environmental Space, Dutch Advisory Council for Research on Nature and Environment, RMNO, Rijswijk, 1994.

[52] M. Buitenkamp, H. Venner, T. Wams (Eds.), Action Plan Sustainable Netherlands, International Books, Utrecht, 1994.

[53] Bund, Misereor (Eds.), Zukunftsfa¨higes Deutschland – Ein Beitrag zu einer global nachhaltigen Entwicklung. Studie des Wuppertal-Institutes für Klima, Umwelt, Energie GmbH, Basel, Boston; Birkha¨user, Berlin, 1996. Published in German only.

[54] C.S. Holling, Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems, Ecosystems 4 (5) (2001) 390–405.

[55] R.U. Ayres, U.E. Simonis (Eds.), Industrial Metabolism – Restructuring for Sustainable Development, United Nations University Press, Tokyo, New York, Paris, 1992.

[56] A. Adriaanse, S. Bringezu, A. Hammond, Y. Moriguchi, E. Rodenburg, D. Rogich, H. Schu¨ tz, Resource Flows – The Material Basis of Industrial Economies, World Resource Institute, Washington, 1997.

[57] F. Hinterberger, F. Luks, F. Schmidt-Bleek,Material flows vs ‘natural capital’. What makes an economy sustainable? Ecological Economics 23 (1) (1997) 1–14.

[58] N. Luhmann, Ecological Communication (translated by John Bednarz), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1989.

[59] A. Metzner, Probleme sozio-o¨ kologischer Systemtheorie – Natur und Gesellschaft in der Soziologie Luhmanns, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, 1993, <http://sammelpunkt.philo.at:8080/1812>.

[60] W. Krohn, G. Krücken, Risiko als Konstruktion und Wirklichkeit – Eine Einführung in die sozialwissenschaftliche Risikoforschung, in: W. Krohn, G. Krücken (Eds.), Riskante Technologien: Reflexion und Regulation, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1993, pp. 9–44.

[61] P. van Zwanenberg, Beyond skeptical relativism: evaluating the social constructions of expert risk assessments, Science, Technology, and Human Values 25 (3) (2000) 259–282.

[62] R. Nola, Pendula, models. Constructivism and reality, Science & Education 13 (4/5) (2004) 349–377.

[63] R. Costanza, Frontiers in Ecological Economics – Transdisciplinary Essays, Elgar, Cheltenham, 1997.

[64] J. Thompson-Klein, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, R. Ha¨ berli, A. Bill, R.W. Scholz, M. Welti (Eds.), Transdisciplinarity – joint problem solving among science, technology, and society. An effective way for managing complexity, Birkha¨user, Basel, Boston, Berlin, 2001.

[65] G. Bechmann, M. Decker, U. Fiedeler, B.-J. Krings, TA in a complex world, International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 3 (1) (2007) 6–27.

[66] K.S. Shrader-Frechette, Risk and Rationality – Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reforms, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, 1991.

[67] R. von Schomberg, The erosion of valuespheres: the ways in which society copes with scientific, in: R. von Schomberg, K. Baynes (Eds.), Moral and Ethical Uncertainty. In Discourse and Democracy: Essays on Habermas’ Between Fact and Norms, State University of New York Press, Albany, 2002, pp. 219–241.

[68] A. Klinke, O. Renn, A new approach to risk-evaluation and management – risk-based, precaution-based, and discourse-based strategies, Risk Analysis 22 (6) (2002) 1071–1094.

[69] S.M. Macgill, Y.L. Siu, A new paradigm for risk analysis, Futures 37 (10) (2005) 1105–1131.

[70] R.E. Kasperson, R.W. Kates, O. Renn, P. Slovic, H.S. Brown, J. Emel, R. Goble, J.S. Kasperson, S. Ratick, The social amplification of risk – a conceptual framework, Risk Analysis 8 (2) (1988) 177–187.

[71] T.R. Burns, T. Dietz, Cultural evolution – social rule systems selection and human agency, International Sociology 7 (3) (1992) 259–283.

[72] K.R. Popper, Objective Knowledge – An Evolutionary Approach, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1972.

[73] T. Horlick-Jones, J. Sime, Living on the border: knowledge risk and transdisciplinarity, Futures 36 (4) (2004) 441–456.

[74] German Advisory Council on Global Change (WBGU), World in transition: strategies for managing global environmental risks (annual report 1998), Springer, Berlin, 2000.

[75] D.W. Rejeski, S & T challenges in the 21st century: strategy and tempo, in: A.H. Teich, S.D. Nelson, S.J. Lita, A.E. Hunt (Eds.), AAAS Science and Technology Policy Yearbook 2003, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, 2003, pp. 47–57. <http://www.aaas.org/spp/yearbook/ 2003/yrbk03.htm>.

[76] A. Metzner, Constructions of environmental issues in scientific and public discourse, in: F. Mu¨ ller, M. Leupelt (Eds.), Eco Targets Goal Functions and Orientors, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg New York, 1998, pp. 312–333.

[77] W. Bell, Making people responsible: the possible, the probable, and the preferable, in: J.A. Dator (Ed.), In Advancing Futures: Futures Studies in Higher Education, Praeger, Westport, CT, 2002, pp. 33–52.

[78] M.F. de Souza Porto, C.M. de Freitas, Vulnerability and industrial hazards in industrializing countries: an integrative approach, Futures 35 (7) (2003) 717– 736.

[79] W.E. Bijker, The vulnerability of technological culture, in: H. Nowotny (Ed.), Cultures of Technology and the Quest for Innovation, Berghahn Books, New York, 2006, pp. 52–69.

[80] W. Bell, Foundations of Futures Studies, Vol. 1/2, Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ, 1997.

[81] R. Slaughter, Futures for the Third Millennium: Enabling the Forward View, Prospect Media, Sydney, 1999.

[82] R. Slaughter, Futures Beyond Dystopia: Creating Social Foresight, Routledge, London, 2005.

[83] A. Grunwald, J. Grin (Eds.), Vision Assessment – Shaping Technology in 21st Century Society, Springer, Berlin, 1999.

[84] J.R. Searle, The Construction of Social Reality, Penguin, London, 1995.

[85] S.O. Funtowicz, J.R. Ravetz, Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science, in: S. Krimsky, D. Golding (Eds.), Social Theories of Risk, Praeger, Westport, CT, London, 1992, pp. 251–273.

[86] M. Harris, Cultural Anthropology, Harper & Row, New York, 1987.

[87] European Commission, External costs – research results on socio-environmental damages due to electricity and transport, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2003. <http://www.externe.info/externpr.pdf>.

[88] A.P.J. Mol, The Refinement of Production – Ecological Modernization Theory and the Chemical Industry, Van Arkel, Utrecht, 1995.

[89] J. Huber, Towards industrial ecology – sustainable development as a concept of ecological modernization, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning Special Issue 2 (2000) 269–285, Ecological Modernization, M. Andersen, I. Massa (Eds.).

[90] J. Spangenberg, R. Mesicek, A. Metzner, F. Luks, Sustainability indicators for the knowledge-based society – measuring the sustainability of the information society, Futura 21 (2) (2002) 85–95.

[91] T. Beer, A. Ismail-Zadeh (Eds.), Risk Science and Sustainability – Science for Reduction of Risk and Sustainable Development of Society, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Boston, London, 2003.

[92] C.C. Jaeger, Risk management and integrated assessment, Environmental Modeling and Assessment 3 (4) (1998) 211–225.

[93] A. Grunwald, Rationality in an uncertain world – the vision of sustainable development as an adequate answer? in: G. Banse, I. Hronszky, G. Nelson (Eds.), Rationality in an Uncertain World, Edition Sigma, Berlin, 2005, pp. 11–35.

[94] L. Newman, Change, uncertainty, and futures of sustainable development, Futures 38 (5) (2006) 633–637.

[95] P. Hjorth, A. Bagheri, Navigating towards sustainable development: a system dynamics approach, Futures 38 (1) (2006) 74–92.

[96] A. Metzner, Die Tücken der Objekte – Über die Risiken der Gesellschaft und ihre Wirklichkeit, Campus, Frankfurt, New York, 2002.

[97] S. Fuller, The future of scientific justice: the case of ‘the sceptical environmentalist’, Futures 36 (5) (2004) 631–636.

[98] H. Nowotny, P. Scott, M. Gibbons, Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty., Polity Press, London, 2001.

[99] R. Grundmann, Ozone and climate – scientific consensus and leadership, Science, Technology, and Human Values 31 (1) (2006) 73–101.

[100] K. Knorr-Cetina, Spielarten des Konstruktivismus, Soziale Welt 40. (1/2) (1989) 86–96.

[101] R.E. Kasperson, The social amplification of risk: progress in developing an integrative framework, in: S. Krimsky, D. Golding (Eds.), Social Theories of Risk, Praeger, Westport, CT, London, 1992, pp. 153–178.

[102] E.A. Rosa, Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk, Journal of Risk Research 1 (1) (1998) 15–44.

[103] C.C. Jaeger, O. Renn, E.A. Rosa, T. Webler, Risk, Uncertainty, and Rational Action, Earthscan, London, 2001.

[104] C. Becker, The human actor in ecological economics: philosophical approach and research perspectives, Ecological Economics 60 (1) (2006) 17–23.

[105] F.G. Wallner, How to Deal with Science If You Care for Other Cultures. Constructive Realism in the Intercultural World, Braumüller, Wien, 1997.

[106] J. Habermas, Knowledge and Human Interests, Beacon Press, Boston, 1971.

[107] M. Peschl, Constructivism cognition, and science – an investigation of its links and possible shortcomings, Foundations of Science 6 (1) (2001) 125–161.

[108] European Environment Agency (EEA), Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896–2000, EEA, Copenhagen, 2001.

[109] A. Rip, Should social amplification of risk be counteracted? Risk Analysis 8 (2) (1988) 193–197.

[110] B. Lomborg, Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist’s Guide to Global Warming, Marshall Cavendish, London, 2007.

[111] U.S. Embassy Beijing Environment, Science, Technology & Health Section, The cost of environmental degradation in China. Beijing, 2000. <http:// www.usembassy-china.org.cn/sandt/CostofPollution-web.html>.