Environmental Kuznets curves and the latecomer’s advantage in selected East Asian economies

Taguchi, Hiroyuki (2006): Environmental Kuznets curves and the latecomer’s advantage in selected East Asian economies. Published in: Journal of International Development Studies , Vol. 15, No. 1 (June 2006): pp. 73-85.

Abstract

Countries in the world, especially developing countries, are under pressure to deal with a variety of environmental problems, such as industrial pollution, urban environmental issues, and global warming, while they are expected to simultaneously achieve high economic growth. In this context, they urgently need to leapfrog over environmental difficulties through progressive environmental management, using their “latecomer’s advantage” to the maximum extent possible. This study examined whether or not East Asian economies actually enjoy the latecomer’s advantage in the area of environmental management, utilizing the analytical framework of the environmental Kuznets curve. The study’s main findings are as follows: (1) the time-series EK curves of their economies are consistent with the hypothesis that they do enjoy the latecomer’s advantage, and (2) a regression analysis using panel data provides significant confirmation of the existence of the latecomer’s advantage for addressing the well known environmental problem of sulfur and carbon emissions.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Environmental Kuznets courves, latecomer's advantage, East Asian economies
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth

References

Borghesi, Simone. 1999. “The Environmemtal Kuznets Curve: A Survey of the Literature.” European University Institute, Florence. Available online at http:// www. Feem. It/web/activ/wp/abs99/85-99.pdf. Processed.

Dasgupta, Susmita, Benoit Laplante, Hua Wang, and David Wheeler. 2002. “Confronting the Environmental Kuznets Curve.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 16(1):147-68.

Gerschenkron, A. 1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Harvard University Press.

Grossman, G. M., and A. B. Krueger. 1995. “Economic growth and the environment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112:353–378.

Hausman, J. A. 1978. Specification test in econometrics. Econometrica 46(6).

Hayami, Y. 1997. Development Economics –From the Poverty to the Wealth of Nations. New York: Clarendon Press. 183-197.

Heston Alan, Robert Summers and Bettina Aten. 2002. Penn World Table Version 6.1, Center for International Comparisons at the University of Pennsylvania (CICUP). < http: //datacentre. chass.utoronto.ca/pwt/index.html>(May 2004).

Irie, Y., Y. Kobayashi, and T. Morita. 2000. Policy analysis on alternative development paths based on the environmental Kuznets curve—empirical proof using time serial data on SO2 and simulation analysis. Breakaway session at the 2000 meeting of Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 30 September, at Tsukuba International Conference Room, Japan.

Islam, Nazrul. 1996. “Income-environment relationship: Is Asia different?” Background paper for Emerging Asia:Changes and Challenges. Asian Development Bank. 1997.

Iwami, T. 2001. “Advantage of Latecomer in Abating Air-Pollution: Experience in East Asia.” CIRJE-J-64, Discussion Paper Series, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.

Japanese Environment Agency. 1998. Annual report on the state of the environment. Tokyo, Japan.

Lefohn A.S., J.D.Husar, and R.B.Husar. 1999. “Estimating Historical Anthropogenic Global Sulfur Emission Patterns for the Period 1850-1990.” Atmospheric Environment. < http://www. asl-associates.com/sulfur1.htm> (May 2004).

Marland, G., T.A. Boden, and R. J. Andres. 2003. Global, Regional, and National Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions. In Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., U.S.A. http: //cdiac.esd.ornl.gov /trends /emis/em_cont.htm> (May 2004).

Martin, P. and D. Wheeler. 1992. “Prices, Policies, and the International Diffusion of Clean Technology: The Case of Wood Pulp Production,” in International Trade and the Environment. Patrick Low, ed. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, pp.197-224.

Matsuoka, S., R. Matsumoto, I. Kawauchi, and M. Iwase. 2000. “The capacity building of environmental management in East Asia.” In View Point to the East Asia 11–4: 92–105.

Panayotou, T. 1997. “Demystifying the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Turning a Black Box into a Policy Tool.” Environment and Development Economic. 104:6, pp.1314-27.

Rothman, D.S. 1998. “Environmental Kuznets curves –real progress or passing the buck? A case for consumption-based approaches.” Ecological Economics 25:177-194.

Selden, T.M. and D. Song. 1994. “Environmental Quality and Development: Is There a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emissions?” Journal of Environmetal Economics and Management, 27: 147-162.

Stokey, N. L. 1998. “Are there limits to growth?” International Economic Review 39: 1-31.

Suri, V. and d. Chapman. 1998. “Economic Growth, Trade and Energy: Implications for the Environmental Kuznets Curve.” Ecological Economics 25:195-205.

World Bank. 1992. “Development and the environment.” World development report. Washington, D.C.: Oxford University Press.

World Bank. 2002. World development indicators 2002. CD-ROM.