Rodriguez-lara, Ismael (2015): Equal distribution or equal payoffs? Reciprocity and inequality aversion in the investment game.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_63313.pdf Download (5MB) | Preview |
Abstract
We report experimental evidence on second-movers' behavior in the investment game (also known as the trust game) when there exists endowment heterogeneity. Using a within-subject analysis, we investigate whether second-movers have a tendency to be reciprocal (i.e., they return to first movers at least what they have received from them), or exhibit some taste for inequality aversion (i.e., they return a larger (smaller) share of the available funds to first-movers who are initially endowed with a lesser (larger) endowment, respectively). Our results suggest that second-movers' behavior is consistent across distribution of endowments, what indicates that second-movers (on average) do not take into consideration the level of endowments when making their decisions. This finding, in turn, implies that subjects behave according to our definition of reciprocity and that inequality-aversion receives little support from our data.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Equal distribution or equal payoffs? Reciprocity and inequality aversion in the investment game |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | reciprocity, inequality aversion, investment game, trust game, endowment heterogeneity |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement |
Item ID: | 63313 |
Depositing User: | Dr Ismael Rodriguez-lara |
Date Deposited: | 29 Mar 2015 13:01 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 20:13 |
References: | Anderson, L. R., Mellor, J. M. & Milyo, J. (2006). Induced heterogeneity in trust experiments. Experimental Economics, 9, 223-235. Ashraf, N., Bohnet, I. & Piankov, N. (2006). Decomposing trust and trustworthiness. Experimental Economics, 9, 193-208. Bereby-Meyer, Y. & Niederle, M. (2005). Fairness in bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 56, 173-186. Berg, J., Dickhaut, J. & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 122?142. Bohnet, I., & Zeckhauser, R. (2004). Trust, risk and betrayal. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 55, 467-485. Bolle, F. & Kaehler, J. (2006). Coleman's Hypothesis on trusting behaviour and a remark on meta-studies. Journal of Economic Methodology, 13, 469-483. Bolton, G. E. & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review, 90, 166-193. Calabuig, V., Fatas, E., Olcina, G. & Rodriguez-Lara, I. (2013). Carry a big stick, or no stick at all: An experimental analysis of trust and capacity of punishment. Working Paper University of Valencia, ERI-CES (No. 0413). Cappelen, A. W., Hole, A. D., Sørensen, E. Ø. & Tungodden, B. (2007). The pluralism of fairness ideals: An experimental approach. American Economic Review, 97, 818-827. Cappelen, A. W., Sørensen, E. & Tungodden, B. (2010). Responsibility for what? Fairness and individual responsibility. European Economic Review, 54, 429?441. Charness, G. & Haruvy, E. (2002). Altruism, fairness, and reciprocity in a gift-exchange experiment: An encompassing approach. Games and Economic Behavior, 40, 203?231. Charness, G. & Rabin, M. (2002). Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 817?869. Charness , G. & Shmidov, V. (2014). Trust and Reciprocity. {Foundations and Trends in Microeconomics, 10, 167?207. Chaudhuri, A. & Gangadharan, L. (2007). An experimental analysis of trust and trustworthiness. Southern Economic Journal, 73, 959?985. Chowdhury, S. M. & Jeon, J. Y. (2014). Impure Altruism or Inequality Aversion? An experimental investigation based on income effects. Journal of Public Economics, 118, 143-150. Ciriolo, E. (2007). Inequity aversion and trustees' reciprocity in the trust game. European Journal of Political Economy, 23, 1007-1024. Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. Cooper, D. & Kagel, J. (2013). Other regarding preferences: A selective survey of experimental results. Forthcoming in J. H. Kagel, and A. Roth (Eds.), The handbook of experimental economics (Vol. 2). Princeton University Press. Cox, J. C. (2004). How to identify trust and reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 46, 260-281. Cox, J. C., Friedman, D. & Gjerstad, S. (2007). A tractable model of reciprocity and fairness. Games and Economic Behavior, 59, 17-45. Cox, J. C., Kerschbamer, R. & Neururer, D. (2014). What is trustworthiness and what drives it?, mimeo. Dawes, C. T., Fowler, J. H., Johnson, T., McElreath, R. & Smirnov, O. (2007). Egalitarian motives in humans. Nature, 446, 794-796. Dufwenberg, M. & Gneezy, U. (2000). Measuring beliefs in an experimental lost wallet game. Games and Economic Behavior, 30, 163?182. Dufwenberg, M. & Kirchsteiger, G. (2004). A Theory of Sequential Reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 47, 268-98. Eckel, C.C. & Wilson, R. K. (2011). Trust and social exchange. In J. Druckman, D. Green , J. Kuklinski & A. Lupia (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Political Science, pp. 243-257. Boston: Cambridge University Press. Eckel, C. C., & Wilson, R. K. (2004). Is trust a risky decision? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 55, 447-466. Engelmann, D. & Strobel, M. (2004). Inequality Aversion, Efficiency, and Maximin Preferences in Simple Distribution Experiments. American Economic Review, 94, 857-869 Falk, A., Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. (2008). Testing theories of fairness -Intentions matter. Games and Economic Behavior, 62, 287?303. Falk, A. & Fischbacher, U. (2006). A theory of reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 54, 293-315. Fehr, E. & Schmidt, K. (1999). A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817-868. Fehr, E. & Schmidt, K. (2002). Theories of fairness and reciprocity: Evidence and economic applications. In M. Dewatripont, L. P. Hansen, & S. J. Turnovsky (Eds.), Advances in eEonomics and Econometrics. Cambridge University Press Filippin, A. & Raimondi, M. (2014). The Patron Game with Heterogeneous Endowments: A Case against Inequality Aversion, mimeo. Glaeser, E., Laibson, D., Scheinkman, J. & Soutter, C. (2000). Measuring trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 811-846. Greiner, B., Ockenfels, A. & Werner, P. (2007). The dynamic interplay of inequality and trust: An experimental study. CESifo working paper, No. 2173. Hong, K., & Bohnet, I. (2007). Status and distrust: The relevance of inequality and betrayal aversion. texit{Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 197-213. Houser, D., Schunk, D., & Winter, J. (2010). Distinguishing trust from risk: An anatomy of the investment game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 74, 72-81. Johansson-Stenman, O., Mahmud, M. & Martinsson, P. (2005). Does stake size matter in trust games? Economic Letters, 88, 365?369. Johansson-Stenman, O., Mahmud, M., & Martinsson, P. (2008). Trust and religion: Experimental evidence from Bangladesh. Economica, 76, 462?485. Johnson, N. D. & Mislin, A. (2011). Trust games: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 865?889. Kritikos, A. & Bolle, F. (2001). Distributional concerns: equity-or efficiency-oriented? Economics Letters, 73, 333-338. Konow, J. (1996). A positive theory of economic fairness. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 31, 13-35. Korenok O., Millner, E., L. & Razzolini, L. (2012). Are Dictators Averse to Inequality? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 82, 543-547. Rabin, M. (1993). Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics. American Economic Review, 83, 1281-1302. Roemer, J. E. (1998). Equality of opportunity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press Schechter, L. (2007). Traditional trust measurement and the risk confound: An experiment in rural Paraguay. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 62, 272-292. Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, Massachusetts. The MIT Press. Xiao, E. & Bicchieri, C. (2010). When equality trumps reciprocity. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, 456-470. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/63313 |