Bonanno, Graziella and De Giovanni, Domenico and Domma, Filippo (2015): The “wrong skewness” problem: a re-specification of Stochastic Frontiers.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_63429.pdf Download (344kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this paper, we study the so-called “wrong skewness” anomaly in Stochastic Frontiers (SF), which consists in the observed difference between the expected and estimated sign of the asymmetry of the composite error. We propose a more general and flexible specification of the SF model, introducing dependence between the two error components and asymmetry (positive or negative) of the random error. This re-specification allows us to decompose the third moment of the composite error in three components, namely: i) the asymmetry of the inefficiency term; ii) the asymmetry of the random error; and iii) the structure of dependence between the error components. This decomposition suggests that the “wrong skewness” anomaly is an ill-posed problem, because we cannot establish ex ante the expected sign of the asymmetry of the composite error. We report a relevant special case that allows us to estimate the three components of the asymmetry of the composite error and, consequently, to interpret the estimated sign. We present two empirical applications. In the first dataset, where the classic SF displays wrong skewness, estimation of our model rejects the dependence hypothesis, but accepts the asymmetry of the random error, thus justifying the sign of the skewness of the composite error. In the second dataset, where the classic SF does not display any anomaly, estimation of our model provides evidence of the presence of both dependence between the error components and asymmetry of the random error.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The “wrong skewness” problem: a re-specification of Stochastic Frontiers. |
English Title: | The “wrong skewness” problem: a re-specification of Stochastic Frontiers. |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Keywords: Stochastic frontier models, Skewness, Generalised Logistic distribution, Dependence, Copula functions. |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C13 - Estimation: General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C18 - Methodological Issues: General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C4 - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics > C46 - Specific Distributions ; Specific Statistics D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity |
Item ID: | 63429 |
Depositing User: | Graziella Bonanno |
Date Deposited: | 04 Apr 2015 06:01 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 18:37 |
References: | D. Aigner, C.A.K. Lovell, and P. Schmidt. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6:21–37, 1977. P. Almanidis and R.C. Sickles. Exploring Research Frontiers in Contemporary Statistics and Econometrics: A Festschrift in Honor of Leopold Simar, chapter Skewness problem in Stochastic Frontier Models: Fact or Fiction? New York: Springer, 2011. E. J. Bartelsman and W. Gray. The NBER manufacturing productivity database. NBER technical, Working Paper, 1996. G. E. Battese and G.S. Corra. Estimation of a production frontier model: With application to the pastoral zone of eastern australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 21:169–179, 1977. G. E. Battese, T. J. Coelli, D. S. P. Rao, and C. J. OD´ onnell. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. 2005. E. Berndt, B. Hall, R. Hall, and J. Hausman. Estimation and Inference in Nonlinear Structural Models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 4:653–665, 1974. K.P. Burnham and D.R. Anderson. Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods Research, 2004. M.A. Carree. Technological inefficiency and the skewness of the error component in stochastic frontier analysis. Economics Letters, 77:101–107, 2002. Q. Feng, W.C. Horrace, and G.L.Wu. Wrong skewness and finite sample correction in parametric stochastic frontier models. 2013. A. Green and D. Mayes. Technical inefficiency in manufacturing industries. Economic Journal, 101:523538, 1991. W. H. Greene. A gamma-distributed stochastic frontier model. Journal of Econometrics, 46: 141–163, 1990. C.M. Hafner, H. Manner, and L. Simar. The ”wrong skewness” problem in stochastic frontier model: a new approach”. Insitutute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences, 2013. Kenneth L. Judd. Numerical Methods in Economics. The MIT Press, 1998. S. C. Kumbhakar and C. A. K. Lovell. Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 2000. D. Meeusen and J. van de Broek. Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review, 18(2):435–444, 1977. R. B. Nelsen. An Introduction to Copula. Springer, 1999. J. Qian and R. C. Sickles. Stochastic frontiers with bounded inefficiency. Rice University, WP, 2009. M. D. Smith. Stochastic frontier models with dependent error components. Econometrics Journal, 11:172–192, 2008. E. G. Tsionas. Efficiency measurement with the weibull Stochastic frontier. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69:693–706, 2007. M. Zenga. Statistica descrittiva. Giappichelli, 1985. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/63429 |