Latecomers' advantages in environmental management of middle income economies

Taguchi, Hiroyuki (2002): Latecomers' advantages in environmental management of middle income economies. Published in: Studies in Regional Science , Vol. 3, No. 32 (2002): pp. 25-38.

Abstract

Middle-income economies in the world are under pressure to deal with a variety of environmental problems, such as industrial pollution, urban environmental issues, the deterioration of ecosystems, and global warming, while they are expected to simultaneously achieve high economic growth. In this context, they urgently need to leapfrog over environmental difficulties through progressive environmental management by utilizing their "latecomers' advantages" to the maximum extent possible. By utilizing the analytical framework of the environmental Kuznets curve (EK curve), this study examines whether or not middle-income economies actually enjoy latecomers' advantages in environmental management, depending on their stages of development. The study's main findings are as follows: (1) the outcomes of comparative analysis of the EK curves are generally consistent with the hypothesis that middle-income economies do enjoy latecomers' advantages; and (2) a regression analysis using cross-sectional data provides significant confirmation of the existence of latecomers' advantages for addressing the well known environmental problem of sulfur emissions in lower-middle-income economies.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: latecomers' advantages, environmental management, middle income economies
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth

References

ASL & Associates. 1996. Assessing historical global sulfur emission patterns for the period 1850 -1990. U. S. Department of Commerce. <http://www.asl-associates.com/sulfur.htm>.

Gerschenkron, A. 1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective, Harvard University Press.

Grossman, G. M. and A. B. Krueger. 1995. Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112:353-378.

Hayami, Y. 1997. Development Economics From the Poverty to the Wealth of Nations. New York: Clarendon Press. 183-197.

Heston, A. and R. Summers. 1995. The Penn World Tables, Version 5.6. <http://datacentre.chass.utoronto.ca/pwt/index.html>.

Irie, Y., Y. Kobayashi and T. Morita. 2000. Policy analysis on alternative development paths based on the environmental Kuznets curve-empirical proof using time serial data on SO2 and simulation analysis. Breakaway session at the 2000 meeting of Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 30 September, at Tsukuba International Conference Room, Japan.

Islam, Nazrul. 1996. Income-environment relationship: Is Asia different? Background paper for Emerging Asia: Changes and Challenges. Asian Development Bank. 1997.

Japanese Environment Agency. 1998. Annual report on the state of the environment. Tokyo,Japan.

Japanese Ministry of the Environment. 2001. International environment cooperation toward sustainable development. <http://www.env.go.jp/earth/coop/index.html>.

Marland, G., TA. Boden and R. J. Andres. 2000. Global, regional, and national fossil fuel CO2 emissions. In Trends: A compendium of data on global change. Oak Ridge, Tenn. U.S.A.: Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy. <http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/trends/emis/tre coun.html>.

Matusoka, S., R. Matsumoto, I. Kawauchi and M. Iwase. 2000. The capacity building of environmental management in East Asia. In View Point to the East Asia 11-4: 92-105.

Panayotou, T. 1995. Environment degradation at different stages of economic development. In Beyond Rio: The environment crisis and sustainable livelihoods in the Third World. Edited by I. Ahmed and J. Doelman. London: Macmillan Press. 13-36.

Rothman, D.S. 1998. Environmental Kuznets curves real progress or passing the buck? A case for consumption-based approaches. Ecological Economics 25: 177-194.

Selden, T. M. and D. Song. 1994. Environmental Quality and Development: Is There a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emissions? Journal of Environmetal Economics and Management, 27:147-162.

Stokey, N. L. 1998. Are there limits to growth? International Economic Review 39: 1-31.

Sun, V. and d. Chapman. 1998. Economic Growth, Trade and Energy: Implications for the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Ecological Economics 25: 195-205.

World Bank. 1992. Development and the environment. World development report. Washington, D.C: Oxford University Press.

World Bank. 2000. World development indicators 2000. CD-ROM