Analyzing the Determinants of Services Trade Flow between Vietnam and European Union: Gravity Model Approach

Dao, Ngoc Tien and Pham, Van Nho and Doan, Quang Hung (2014): Analyzing the Determinants of Services Trade Flow between Vietnam and European Union: Gravity Model Approach.

Abstract

This paper aims at analyzing the determinants of services trade flows between Vietnam and European Union. In this respect, a gravity model has been estimated with panel data and pooled, random and fixed effect estimation covering the period of ten years from 2002 to 2011 for total services trade, services exports and services imports between Vietnam and European Union separately. The estimated results on total services trade indicate that bilateral services trade flows between Vietnam and its European partner countries are mainly affected by GDP per capita gap between Vietnam and partner countries, population of partner countries, real effective exchange rate, colonial relationship and being former members of CMEA.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Gravity model, Services Trade, Vietnam, EU
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade

References

Alejandro L., E. Forden, E. Oh, J. Peterson, S. Pham, M. Reisman, G. Serletis, D. Vu and I. Wohl. (2012). An Overview and Examination of the Vietnamese Services Sector. Office of Industries Working Paper, U.S. International Trade Commission.

Amrington, P. S. (1969). A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production. IMF Staff Paper, 16, 159-716.

Anderson, J. E. (1979). A Theorical Foundation for the Gravity Equation. American Economic Review, 69(1), 106-116.

Bac, N. X. (2010). The Determinants of Vietnamese Export Flow: Static and Dynamic Panel Gravity Approaches. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2(4).

Bacchetta, M., C. Beverelli, O. Cadot, M. Fugazza, J. M. Grether, M. Helble, A. Nicita, and R. Piermartini. (2012). Chapter 3: Analyzing Bilateral Trade using the Gravity Equation. In A Practical Guide to Trade Policy Analysis. United Nations and World Trade Organization.

Bergstrand, J. (1985). The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67, 474-481.

Bergstrand, J. (1989). The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 143-153.

Binh, D. T. T., N. V. Duong and H. M. Cuong. (2011). Applying Gravity Model to Analyze Trade Activities of Vietnam.

Chaney, T. (2008). Distorted gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margin of International Trade. American Economic Review, 98, 1707-1721.

Cheng, I. H. and H. Wall. (2005). Controlling for Heterogeneity in Gravity Models of Trade and Integration. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 87(1), 49-63.

Deardorff, V. A. (1998). Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World? The Rejionalization of Economy, 7-22.

Eaton, J., and S. Kortum. (2002). Technology, Geography, and Trade. Econometrica, 70(5), 1741-1779.

Francoi, J. (2001). The next WTO Round: North - South Stakes in New Markets Access Negotiations. Adelaide: Centre for International Economics Studies.

Francois, J., H. V. Meijl and F. V. Tongeren. (2003). Economic Benefits of the Doha Round for the Netherlands. Hague: Agricultural Economics Institute.

Grunfeld, L. A. and A. Moxnes. (2003). The Intangible Globalization: Explaining the Patterns of International Trade in Services. Discussion Paper, 657.

Helpman, E., and P. Krugman. (1985). Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition and the International Economy. MIT Press.

Helpman, E., M. Melitz and Y. Rubinstein. (2008). Trading partners and trade volumes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 441-487.

Kimura, F., and H. H. Lee. (2004). The Gravity Equation in International Trade in Services. European Trade Study Group Conference, University of Nottingham.

Kox, H. and A. Lejour. (2005). Regulatory Heterogeneity as Obstacle for International Services Trade. CPB Discussion Paper, 49.

Lejour, A. and J. de P. Verheijden. (2004). Services Trade with Canada and the European Union. CPB Discussion Paper, 42.

Lennon, C. (2006). Trade in Services and Trade in Goods: Differences and Complemetarities. Conference of the European Trade Study Group. Vienna.

Mayer, T., and S. Zignago. (2011). Notes on CEPII's Distances Measure: The GeoDist database. CEPII, WP.

Mirza, D., and G. Nicoletti. (2004). What is so Special about Trade in Services? Research Paper 2004, 2.

Park, S. C. (2002). Measuring Tariff Equivalents in Cross-Border Trade in Services. Korea Institute for International Economic Policy Working Paper, 2.

Shepherd, B. (2012). The Gravity Model of International Trade: A User Guide. ARTNeT and United Nations ESCAP.

Shepherd, B., and E. V. D. Marel. (2010). Trade in Services in the APEC Region: Patterns, Determinants, and Policy Implications. APEC Policy Support Unit.

Timbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.

Thai, D. T. (2006). A Gravity Model for Trade between Vietnam and Twenty-three European Countries. Department of Economics and Society.

Walsh, K. (2006). Trade in Servies: Does Gravity Hold? A Gravity Model Approach to Estimating Barriers to Services Trade. IIIS Discussion Paper, 183.

Zarzoso, I. M., and F. N. Lehmann. (2002). MERCOSUR-European Union Trade: How Important is EU Trade Liberalization for MERCOSUR's Export? European Trade Study Group. Kiel.