Taguchi, Hiroyuki and Lar, Ni (2015): FDI, industrial upgrading and economic corridor in Myanmar. Published in: Chapter VI, Progress report on the potentials on the Indochina economic zone (March 2015): pp. 99-133.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_64411.pdf Download (685kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This chapter addresses the issues on inward foreign direct investment (FDI), industrial upgrading, and economic-corridor development in Myanmar. We first present the economic profile of Myanmar by comparing with other economies in Mekong region as well as its brief history. Second, we discuss the role of inward FDI in Myanmar. From a short-term perspective, Myanmar needs to accept inward FDI to participate in international production networks and thus to develop a manufacturing sector. This section represents empirical evidence on the linkage between FDI and the growth of GDP and exports, and investigates a specific issue to be addressed for accepting inward FDI in Myanmar manufacturing sector. Third, from a long-term perspective, we discuss the issues on industrial upgrading and geographical linkage in Myanmar economy. Myanmar now depends heavily on natural resource production in its economy, and also on labor-intensive production in its manufacturing sector. Thus, the industrial reformation should address how to diversify its industries towards a variety of manufacturing sectors and how to upgrade its industries towards upstream and high-valued manufacturing sectors. From the geographical viewpoint, Myanmar also now depends on spot-area development through its SEZ framework. For extending the economic impacts of the SEZ development to nation-wide level, the SEZ development should contribute to an economic corridor approach linked with neighboring countries.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | FDI, industrial upgrading and economic corridor in Myanmar |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | FDI, industrial upgrading, economic corridor, Myanmar |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F23 - Multinational Firms ; International Business O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O53 - Asia including Middle East |
Item ID: | 64411 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Hiroyuki Taguchi |
Date Deposited: | 17 May 2015 19:47 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 13:19 |
References: | Ahmad, M.H., Alam, S., and Butt, M.S. 2004. Foreign direct investment, exports and domestic output in Pakistan. Paper presented at the 19th Annual General Meeting, PIDE, Quaid-e-Azam University, Islamabad. Cho, K. 2005. Studies on knowledge spillovers, trade, and foreign direct investment—Theory and empirics, Ph.D. Thesis, Boulder, CO: Department of Economics, University of Colorado at Boulder. Chowdhury, A., and Mavrotas, G. 2006. FDI and growth: What causes what? World Economy, 29(1), pp. 9–19. Cuadros, A., Orts, V., and Alguacil, M. 2004. Openness and growth: Re-examining foreign direct investment, trade and output linkages in Latin America. The Journal of Development Studies, 40(4), pp. 167–192. Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA). 2013. Draft of Myanmar Comprehensive Development Vision (MCDV). Hansen, H., and Rand, J. 2006. On the causal links between FDI and growth in developing countries. World Economy, 29(1), pp. 21–41. Hsiao, F.S.T., and Hsiao, MC. W. 2006. FDI, exports, and GDP in East and Southeast Asia—Panel data versus time-series causality analyses. Journal of Asian Economics, 17, pp. 1082–1106. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) 2014. Report on Job Creation by Border Area Development between Thailand and Myanmar, Phase II. Johansen, S. 1995. Likelihood-based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Kohpaiboon, A. 2003. Foreign trade regimes and FDI-growth nexus: A case study of Thailand. The Journal of Development Studies, 40(2), pp. 55–69. Kubo, K. 2014. Myanmar’s Non-resource Exports Potential after the Lifting of Economic sanctions: a Gravity Model Analysis. Asia-Pacific Development Journal, 21(1), pp. 1-22. Levin, A., Lin, C.F., and Chu, C. 2002. Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108, pp. 1–24. Liu, X., Burridge, P., and Sinclair, P.J.N. 2002. Relationships between economic growth, foreign direct investment and trade: Evidence from China. Applied Economics, 34, pp. 1433–1440. Nair-Reichert, U., and Weinhold, D. 2000. Causality tests for cross-country panels: New look at FDI and economic growth in developing countries. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 64, pp. 153–171. OECD. 2013. Multi-dimensional Review of Myanmar: Volume 1. Initial Assessment, OECD Development Pathways, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264202085-en Said, S., and Dickey, D.A. 1984. Testing for unit roots in autoregressive-moving average models of unknown order, Biometrika, 71, pp. 599–607. Taguchi, H. 2014. Dynamic Impacts of Global Value Chains Participation on Asian Developing Economies. Foreign Trade Review, 49(4), pp. 1-14. UNCTAD. 2013. World Investment Report - Global Value Chains: Investment and Trade for Development, UNCTAD. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/64411 |