Reconsidering Ethnic-Based-Autonomy Movements in Meghalaya: An Analysis

Singha, Komol and Nayak, Purusottam (2015): Reconsidering Ethnic-Based-Autonomy Movements in Meghalaya: An Analysis.

Abstract

To the unfamiliar, communities living in Meghalaya appear to be homogenous ones. In reality, however, they are socially, politically and culturally not only heterogeneous but are also defined by distinct tribal and clan markers. Three major tribes– the Khasi, the Garo, and the Jaintia, dominate the state. Each of them had their own kingdoms until they were brought under the British colonial administration in the 19th century. Consequently, after independence, these tribes and their territories were merged with undivided Assam, and then carved out as a full-fledged state of Meghalaya in 1972. Soon after attaining statehood, tensions cropped up between the indigenous communities and migrants mainly over the issue of economic opportunity. However, these days, it has slowly shifted towards the internal feuds among the indigenous tribes and separate demand for states within the state. With this background, the paper attempts to analyse the causes and consequences of autonomy demands asserted by different communities/tribes within the state.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Autonomy, Conflict, Garo, Identity, Khasi, Meghalaya
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development

References

Baruah, A. K. (2004): Ethnic conflicts and traditional self-governing institutions: A study of Laitumkhrah Dorbar. Working Paper No. 39, Crisis States Programme, LSE, London: Development Research Centre.

Baruah, S. (1989): Indigenous peoples, cultural survival and minority policy in Northeast India. Cultural Survival Quarterly, [Retrieved from http://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/india/indigenous-peoples-cultural-survival-and-minority-pol]

Census of India (2011): Meghalaya Census of India [Retrieved from http://censusindia.gov.in/2011-prov-results/data_files/meghalaya/2.%20highlighs.pdf]

Das, R. P. (2013): Assam and Meghalaya: Threats of violence in Garo heartland. Article No. 4192, November 26, Guwahati: Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.

Das, D. (2007): Cultural politics, identity crisis and private capitalism in coal mines of Meghalaya, Northeast India. Case study No. 16, Artisanal and small-scale mining in Asia-pacific portal [Retrieved http://asmasiapacific.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/ASMAP-CS16_Debojyoti.pdf]

Gohain, H. (2014): A note on recent ethnic violence in Assam. Economic and Political Weekly, 49(13): 19-22.

Hossain, Md. K. (2009): Fraternal relative deprivation of a tribal population in Chittagong hill tracts, Bangladesh. Journal of Life Earth Science. 3(4): 29-32.

Hussain, M. (1987): Tribal movement for autonomous state in Assam. Economic and Political Weekly, 22(32): 1329-1332.

Haokip, T. (2013): Inter-ethnic relations in Meghalaya. Asian Ethnicity, DOI: 10.1080/14631369.2013.853545. Irobi, E.G. (2005): Ethnic conflict management in Africa: A comparative case study of Nigeria and South Africa, [Retrieved from http://www.beyondintractability.org/casestudy/irobi-ethnic]

Karna, M. N. (Undated): Identity politics. [Retrieved from http://www.ide.go.jp/English/Publish/Download/Jrp/pdf/133_7.pdf].

MHDR (2008): Meghalaya Human Development Report 2008, Planning Department, Shillong: Government of Meghalaya. Meghalaya Handbook (2006): Meghalaya Handbook 2006, Planning Department, Shillong: Government of Meghalaya.

Mukhim, P. (2013): Non-tribals in Meghalaya– Non-citizens or half citizens? Shillong: The Shillong Times, Friday, March 22.

News (2014): Meghalaya assembly rejects resolution creation of Garoland, 18th March [http://news.webindia123.com/news/articles/India/20140318/2359275.html]

Nayak, P. & Ray, S. (2010): Inter-district disparities in Meghalaya: A human development approach, In Nayak, P. (ed.), Growth and human development in North East India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp.201-216.

Phukan, M.D. (2013): Ethnicity, conflict and population displacement in Northeast India. Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2): 91-101.

Rammohan, E.N. (2007): The insurgent North-east. In Kumar, B.B. (Ed.), Problems of ethnicity in the North-east India, Delhi: Astha Bharati, pp. 58-80.

Rahman, M.Z. (2011): North-east India– Protracted conflicts and protracted peace processes. In Chandran, D.S. and Chari, P.R. (eds.): Armed conflict in South Asia 2010– Growing left-wing extremism and religious violence, New Delhi: Routledge, pp. 123-151.

Singha, K. (2012): Identity, contestation and development in North East India: A study of Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland. Journal of Community Positive Practices, 12 (3):403-424.

Saxena, N.C. (2002): Rural poverty in Meghalaya– Its nature, dimensions and possible options. [Retrieved http://planningcommission.nic.in/reports/articles/ncsxna/ncsax3.htm]

The Assam Tribune (2013): New forum to espouse separate state demand, Guwahati: The Assam Tribune, Thursday, September 5.

The Hindu (2014a): Meghalaya assembly rejects resolution creation of Garo-land, March 18, 2014 [http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/meghalaya-assembly-rejects-resolution-for-garoland/article5800694.ece]

–––– (2014b). Meghalaya minister charge-sheeted for taking help of militant outfit. Wednesday, November 5, 2014: The Hindu, Kolkata, pp. 2.

Upadhyaya, A. S.; Upadhyaya, P. and Yadav, A. K. (2013): Interrogating peace in Meghalaya. Core Policy Brief No. 03, Cultures of Governance and Conflict Resolution in Europe and India, Oslo: Peace Research Institute.

Understanding Meghalaya (2010): Understanding Meghalaya, July 5, 2010 [Retrieved http://dharma-yuddham.blogspot.in/2010/07/understanding-meghalaya.html]