Kundu, Nobinkhor (2014): Sustainable energy for Development: Access to finance on renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies for Bangladesh.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_65154.pdf Download (580kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Bangladesh will achieve considerable success in acceleration of economic growth of course need for sustainable energy for development (SED). Renewable or ‘green’ energy is now at forefront of the country’s priorities for environmentally sustainable economic progress. The Power Division under the Ministry of Power, Energy & Mineral Resources (MPEMR) has declared a “Renewable Energy Policy of Bangladesh” and under the Companies Act, 1994, the GoB, is establishing an institution named “Sustainable Energy Development Authority” (SEDA).
At present Bangladesh takes the different financing models that have been developed and tested for renewable energy projects in urban and rural communities and energy efficiency improvement projects. Bangladesh Bank (BB) has developed an incentive scheme for concessional refinancing for small solar energy, bio-gas plants and Effluent Treatment Plants (ETP). These are recent initiatives on their part and Banks are yet to take full advantage of such concessional refinance.
To analysis primary data collected for used cross sectional study to be considered about allied factors for renewable energy especially solar energy. A structured questionnaire was prepared in the light of the objectives of the study that was filled up by direct interview. The multivariate techniques viz., multiple logistic regression models, will be used to identify the inputs significant for sustainable energy for development in Bangladesh that is accelerating economic growth of a nation. Software packages Eviews - 5.1 have built-in routines to estimate the logit model at the individual level.
Logistic regressions have been presented with the dependent variable as an indicator of the probability of being in generate RE and EE. Dependent variables dummy of RE and EE (= 1, if a generate RE and EE is full, otherwise under) have been included. The expected sign of explanatory variables coefficients are positive and or negative respectively. Thus, other things remaining same, if high cost RE/EE technologies up to become low cost, each stakeholder will purchase RE/EE technologies. However, together all the regressors have a significant impact on the log of RE/EE, whose p-value is about 0.0000, which is statistically significant.
We are looking at different sources of financing on both RE and EE investment decisions. Overall, financial institutions will aim to create a package that includes the total finance amount and the repayment terms, the interest rate, the repayment schedule and any guarantees or securities. When successful, these new approaches could be capable of triggering the involvement of commercial banks. Point of view of banking and financing institutions and risks associated with renewable energy (RE) and energy efficiency (EE) technologies for sustainable energy for development (SED).
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Sustainable energy for Development: Access to finance on renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies for Bangladesh |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency, Sustainable Development |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q26 - Recreational Aspects of Natural Resources Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth |
Item ID: | 65154 |
Depositing User: | Mr. Nobinkhor Kundu |
Date Deposited: | 22 Jun 2015 06:02 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 23:15 |
References: | Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), pp. 464-477. Arkesteijn, K. & Oerlemans, L. (2005). The early adoptions of green power by Dutch households An empirical exploration of factors influencing the early adoption of green electricity for domestic purposes. Energy Policy, 33(2), pp. 183-196. Bangladesh Bank (various years). Banking Regulation and Policy Department (BRPD) Circular, GOB. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (various years). Statistical Yearbook of Bangladesh, GOB. Batley, S.L., Colbourne, D., Fleming, P.D. & Urwin, P. (2001). Citizen versus consumer: challenges in the UK green power market. Energy Policy, 29(6), pp. 479-487. Bird, L., Bolinger, M., Gagliano, T., Wiser, R., Brown, M. & Parsons, B. (2005). Policies and market factors driving wind power development in the United States. Energy Policy, 33(11), pp. 1397-1407. Bird, L., Wüstenhagen, R. & Aabakken, J. (2002). A review of international green power markets: recent experience, trends, and market drivers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 6(6), pp. 513-536. Böhringer, C., Hoffmann, T. & Rutherford, T.F. (2007). Alternative strategies for promoting renewable energy in EU electricity markets. Applied Economics Quarterly, 58, pp. 9-26. Borchers, A.M., Duke, J.M. & Parsons, G.R. (2007). Does willingness to pay for green energy differ by source? Energy Policy, 35(6), pp. 3327-3334. Braun, Harry, (1990). The Phoenix Project: An Energy Transition to Renewable Resources, Research Analysts: Phoenix, AZ. Brekke, K.A., Kverndokk, S. & Nyborg, K. (2003). An economic model of moral motivation. Journal of public Economics, 87(9–10), pp. 1967-1983. Brent, R.J. (2007). Applied cost-benefit analysis: Edward Elgar Publishing. Ek, K. & Söderholm, P. (2008). Norms and economic motivation in the Swedish green electricity market. Ecological Economics, 68(1–2), pp. 169-182. Farhar, B.C. (1999). Willingness to pay for electricity from renewable resources: a review of utility market research: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Fouquet, R. (1998). The United Kingdom demand for renewable electricity in a liberalised market. Energy Policy, 26(4), pp. 281-293. Fox, J. (1984). “Linear statistical Models and Related Methods”, John Willy & Sons Inc., Newyork. Gan, J. & Smith, C.T. (2011). Drivers for renewable energy: A comparison among OECD countries. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35(11), pp. 4497-4503. Gujarati, D. N. (2004). “Basic Econometrics”, 4th Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York. Hanley, N. & Nevin, C. (1999). Appraising renewable energy developments in remote communities: the case of the North Assynt Estate, Scotland. Energy Policy, 27(9), pp. 527-547. Hordeski, Michael F., (2003). New Technologies for Energy Efficiency, The Fairmont Press: Liburn, GA. Jacobsson, S. & Lauber, V. (2006). The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy, 34(3), pp. 256-276. Jefferson, M. (2006). Sustainable energy development: performance and prospects. Renewable Energy, 31(5), pp. 571-582. Johnstone, N., Haščič, I. & Popp, D. (2010). Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts. Environmental and Resource Economics, 45(1), pp. 133-155. Kobos, P.H., Erickson, J.D. & Drennen, T.E. (2006). Technological learning and renewable energy costs: implications for US renewable energy policy. Energy Policy, 34(13), pp. 1645-1658. Kotchen, M.J. & Moore, M.R. (2007). Private provision of environmental public goods: Household participation in green-electricity programs. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53(1), pp. 1-16. Kramer, J.S. (1991), “The Logit Model for Economists”, Edward Arnold Publishers, London. Marques, A.C. & Fuinhas, J.A. (2012). Are public policies towards renewables successful? Evidence from European countries. Renewable Energy, 44(0), pp. 109-118. Martinot, E. (2001). ‘Renewable Energy Investment by the World Bank’. Energy Policy 29. Martinot, E. and McDoom, O. (2000). Promoting Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy: GEF Climate Change Projects and Impacts. Washington DC: Global Environment Facility. Menanteau, P., Finon, D. & Lamy, M.-L. (2003). Prices versus quantities: choosing policies for promoting the development of renewable energy. Energy Policy, 31(8), pp. 799-812. Mitchell, C. & Connor, P. (2004). Renewable energy policy in the UK 1990–2003. Energy Policy, 32(17), pp. 1935-1947. Nyborg, K., Howarth, R.B. & Brekke, K.A. (2006). Green consumers and public policy: On socially contingent moral motivation. Resource and Energy Economics, 28(4), pp. 351-366. Painuly, J.P. (2001). Barriers to renewable energy penetration; a framework for analysis. Renewable Energy, 24(1), pp. 73-89. Peidong, Z., Yanli, Y., jin, S., Yonghong, Z., Lisheng, W. & Xinrong, L. (2009). Opportunities and challenges for renewable energy policy in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(2), pp. 439-449. Pichert, D. & Katsikopoulos, K.V. (2008). Green defaults: Information presentation and pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(1), pp. 63-73. Popp, D., Hascic, I. & Medhi, N. (2011). Technology and the diffusion of renewable energy. Energy Economics, 33(4), pp. 648-662. Salmela, S. & Varho, V. (2006). Consumers in the green electricity market in Finland. Energy Policy, 34(18), pp. 3669-3683. Schwartz, S.H. & Howard, J.A. (1981). A normative decision-making model of altruism. Altruism and helping behavior, pp. 189-211. Schwartz, S.H. (1977). Normative Influences on Altruism1. Advances in experimental social psychology, 10, pp. 221-279. Shrimali, G. & Kniefel, J. (2011). Are government policies effective in promoting deployment of renewable electricity resources? Energy Policy, 39(9), pp. 4726-4741. Stern, P.C. & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50(3), pp. 65-84. Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G.A. & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human ecology review, 6(2), pp. 81-98. Tan, K.T., Lee, K.T. & Mohamed, A.R. (2008). Role of energy policy in renewable energy accomplishment: The case of second-generation bioethanol. Energy Policy, 36(9), pp. 3360-3365. Winkler, H. (2005). Renewable energy policy in South Africa: policy options for renewable electricity. Energy Policy, 33(1), pp. 27-38. Wiser, R.H. & Pickle, S. (1997). Green marketing, renewables, and free riders: increasing customer demand for a public good: Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California. World Bank (1996). Rural Energy and Development: Improving Energy Supplies for Two Billion People. Washington DC: World Bank. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/65154 |