Grechyna, Daryna (2015): Quantifying the Impact of Political Frictions on Public Policy.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_65266.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper evaluates the impact of political frictions on fiscal policy in a sample of developed countries. We use a model of fiscal policy that features a lack of commitment by the government, political turnover, and another political friction which can be interpreted either as political polarization or as public rent-seeking. Political turnover increases public debt levels, while political polarization or public rent-seeking lead to higher public spending. We find that political frictions account for 67% of variation in government debt, 36% of variation in government spending, and 24% of variation in taxes in twenty two developed countries.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Quantifying the Impact of Political Frictions on Public Policy |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | fiscal policy; political turnover; political polarization; public rent-seeking. |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E61 - Policy Objectives ; Policy Designs and Consistency ; Policy Coordination E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H21 - Efficiency ; Optimal Taxation H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H63 - Debt ; Debt Management ; Sovereign Debt |
Item ID: | 65266 |
Depositing User: | Daryna Grechyna |
Date Deposited: | 26 Jun 2015 10:32 |
Last Modified: | 19 Oct 2019 16:53 |
References: | 1.Acemoglu, D., Golosov M., Tsyvinski O. 2008a. Markets Versus Governments. Journal of Monetary Economics, 55 (1): 159-189. 2.Acemoglu, D., Golosov M., Tsyvinski O. 2008b. Political Economy of Mechanisms. Econometrica, 76 (3): 619-641. 3.Acemoglu, D., Golosov M., Tsyvinski O. 2011a. Power Fluctuations and Political Economy. Journal of Economic Theory, 146 (3): 1009--1041. 4.Acemoglu, D., Golosov M., Tsyvinski O. 2011b. Political Economy of Ramsey Taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 95 (7-8): 467-475. 5.Aguiar, M., M. Amador, and G. Gopinath. 2009. Investment cycles and sovereign debt overhang. Review of Economic Studies, 76 (1): 1-31. 6.Aguiar, M. and M. Amador. 2011. Growth in the Shadow of Expropriation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126 (2): 651-697. 7.Ales L., P. Maziero, P. Yared. 2014. A theory of political and economic cycles. Journal of Economic Theory, 153: 224--251. 8.Alesina, A., and Tabellini, G., 1990. A Positive Theory of Fiscal Deficits and Government Debt. Review of Economic Studies, 57 (3): 403-414. 9.Azzimonti, M., 2011. Barriers to investment in polarized societies. American Economic Review, 101 (5), 2182--2204. 10.Azzimonti, M., 2014. The dynamics of public investment under persistent electoral advantage. Review of Economic Dynamics, In Press. 11.Battaglini M., Coate S., 2008. A Dynamic Theory of Public Spending, Taxation, and Debt. American Economic Review, 98 (1): 201-236. 12.Caballero R., P. Yared, 2010. Future rent-seeking and current public savings. Journal of International Economics, 82 (2): 124-136. 13.Debortoli, D, Nunes, R., 2010. Fiscal policy under loose commitment. Journal of Economic Theory, 145 (3): 1005-1032. 14.Debortoli, D., Nunes, R., 2013. Lack of commitment and the level of debt. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11 (5): 1053-1078. 15.Klein, P., Krusell, P., & Rios-Rull, J. V., 2008. Time-consistent public policy. The Review of Economic Studies, 75 (3), 789-808. 16.Lindqvist, E., P. Ostling. 2010. Political Polarization and the Size of Government. American Political Science Review, 104 (3): 543-565. 17.Lucas, R. E., Stokey N. L. 1983. Optimal fiscal and monetary policy in an economy without capital, Journal of Monetary Economics, 12 (1): 55--93. 18.Ortigueira S., J. Pereira, P. Pichler, 2012. Markov-perfect optimal fiscal policy: the case of unbalanced budgets. Economics Working Papers we1230, Universidad Carlos III, Departamento de EconomÃa. 19.Persson, T. and Svensson, L., 1989. Why a Stubborn Conservative would Run a Deficit: Policy with Time-Inconsistent Preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104 (2): 325-345. 20.Teorell, J., St. Dahlberg, S. Holmberg, Bo Rothstein, F. Hartmann & R. Svensson. 2015. The Quality of Government Standard Dataset, version Jan15. University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute, http://www.qog.pol.gu.se. 21.Yared P., 2010. Politicians, Taxes and Debt. Review of Economic Studies, 77 (2): 806-840. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/65266 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Quantifying the Impact of Political Frictions on Public Policy. (deposited 26 Jun 2015 10:32) [Currently Displayed]