Iwata, Shinichiro and Naoi, Michio (2015): The asymmetric housing wealth effect on childbirth.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_65360.pdf Download (268kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The literature has shown that an increase in housing wealth, driven by unexpected shocks to house prices, exerts a positive effect on the birthrates of homeowners. According to canonical models, a decrease in housing wealth has a symmetric negative impact on the fertility behavior of households. That is, housing gains and losses of the same size should have identical quantitative effects on fertility. In comparison, prospect theory suggests that people care more about housing losses than equivalent gains, leading to an asymmetric effect of housing wealth on the fertility decision. In our model, we weight the utility from childbirth by the utility from the price of housing, where the reference level is the house price in previous years. The theoretical model suggests that the probability of childbirth is kinked at a reference level of housing wealth and the wealth effects are discontinuously larger below this kink than above it. We test this theoretical prediction using longitudinal data on Japanese households. Consistent with this theoretical prediction, our empirical results show that the fertility responses of homeowners, as measured by the birth hazard rate, are substantially larger when housing wealth is below its reference level than when it is above its reference level.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The asymmetric housing wealth effect on childbirth |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | childbirth; housing price; wealth; homeownership; reference-dependent preferences; loss aversion |
Subjects: | J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J13 - Fertility ; Family Planning ; Child Care ; Children ; Youth R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R2 - Household Analysis > R21 - Housing Demand |
Item ID: | 65360 |
Depositing User: | Shinichiro Iwata |
Date Deposited: | 01 Jul 2015 08:34 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 01:34 |
References: | Becker, G. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time, Economic Journal, 75, 493-517. Campbell, J. Y., and Cocco, J. F. (2007). How do house prices affect consumption? Evidence from micro data. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54, 591-621. Case, K. E., Quigley, J. M., and Shiller, R. J. (2005). Comparing wealth effects: The stock market versus the housing market. Advances in Macroeconomics, 5, 1-32. Case, K. E., Quigley, J. M., and Shiller, R. J. (2013). Wealth effects revisited 1975-2012. Critical Finance Review, 2, 101-128. Dettling, L. J., and Kearney, M.S. (2014). House prices and birth rates: The impact of the real estate market on the decision to have a baby. Journal of Public Economics, 110, 82-100. Disney, R., Gathergood, J., and Henley, A. (2010). House price shocks, negative equity, and household consumption in the United Kingdom. Journal of the European Economic Association, 8, 1179-1207. Engelhardt, G. V. (1996). House prices and home owner saving behavior. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26, 313-336. Genesove, D., and Mayer, C. (2001). Loss aversion and seller behavior: Evidence from the housing market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1233-1260. Hashimoto, Y., and Kondo, A. (2012). Long-term effects of labor market conditions on family formation for Japanese youth. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 26, 1-22. Iwaisako, T. (2009). Household portfolios in Japan. Japan and the World Economy, 21, 373-382. Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47 263-291. Kiel, K. A., and Zabel, J. E. (1999). The accuracy of owner-provided house values: The 1978-1991 American Housing Survey. Real Estate Economics 27, 263-298. Lovenheim, M. F. (2011). The effect of liquid housing wealth on college enrollment. Journal of Labor Economics, 29, 741-771. Lovenheim, M. F., and Mumford K. J. (2013). Do family wealth shocks affect fertility choices? Evidence from the housing market boom and bust. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95, 464-475. Nakagawa, M., and Saito, M. (2012). Prospect theory and the choice of earthquake resistant apartments. In: Saito, M., and Nakagawa, M. (Eds.) Earthquake Risk Management from the Aspect of Human Behavior: Designing New Social System. Keisoshobo, Tokyo, pp.179-206, in Japanese. Öst, C. E. (2012). Housing and children: Simultaneous decisions?-A cohort study of young adults' housing and family formation decision. Journal of Population Economics, 25, 349-366. Paiella, M. (2009). The stock market, housing and consumer spending: A survey of the evidence on wealth effects. Journal of Economic Surveys, 23, 947-973. Seko, M., and Sumita, K. (2007). Effects of government policies on residential mobility in Japan: Income tax deduction system and the rental act. Journal of Housing Economics, 16, 167-188. Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039-1061. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/65360 |