Greening Economy, Graying Society

Bretschger, Lucas (2015): Greening Economy, Graying Society. Published in: CER-ETH Press (June 2015)

Abstract

The world economy is affecting ecosystems in a way that puts future living standards at risk. Important issues include global warming, fading resource stocks, scarce water supplies, and decreasing biodiversity. It is broadly ac-accepted that the future of our planet should be one of our major concerns. But when it comes to concrete policies, most clearly those related to climate change, grave difficulties arise. This may come as a surprise. In fact, it should not be surprising. Forward-looking and green policies have always proved to be demanding and controversial. At the global scale, national policy difficulties are only compounded. There is not sufficient consensus across the different countries.

World society is not very dynamic in problem solving. Rather, it is graying and inertial, cultivating conservative views and institutions. Economic interests and political perceptions diverge widely across countries. While the potentials offered by green technologies are huge, institutions have not yet adapted to meet the challenges. The political debate lacks sufficient focus; it includes very diverse opinions and notions on admittedly complex issues.

It is true that the most prominent sustainability policy, climate policy, combines the most difficult and complex conditions for policy making in a single subject. Correction of a big market failure, international consensus building, long-run planning, major uncertainties, huge equity concerns, and very heterogeneous country interests are ingredients that would bedevil any political decision.

On the bright side, concepts such as “green economy” and “sustainable development” have prominently entered the political debate, documenting the rising number of bridges between economy and ecology. Re-source-efficient technologies are increasingly being developed and applied. Yet, while everyone would highly welcome political solutions to the climate problem, accepting their consequences is much less widely embraced. These include significant reductions in natural resource use, especially with fossil fuels. They also entail acknowledging responsibility for past emissions and obligations to other countries and future generations. Consistent sustainability policies require a framework and an institutional setting that has yet to be built and globally implemented. Such a framework would end-able policymakers exploiting the huge potentials for greening the economy.

Many scientific and applied contributions on sustainability have al-ready been published. But the majority of the advocated policies have not been implemented; major problems such as global warming have not yet been properly addressed. It appears that sustainability policies are not attracting sufficient political support. By pointing to the profound problems inherent in policy making in this area, this book explains why this is the case. It also provides the elements needed to increase general understanding and to find political consensus.

Compared to the much broader scientific contributions on sustainability, some authored by large numbers of international researchers in different disciplines, the present book takes a more modest approach. It draws on selected research results to explain the most important sustainability is-sues from the point of view of economics. The book points at central underlying problems and misperceptions with the aim of increasing ambitions and rationality in political decision making. It reflects the high complexity of reaching sustainable development, which will require the contribution of social sciences involving many different perspectives.

The book uses neither formal models nor mathematical equations. These can be found in the underlying original academic works cited in the references. The approach follows that of the famous economist Alfred Mar-shall, who advised using formal analysis until the results were fully de-rived but then to “burn” the mathematics, translate the conclusions into normal language, and illustrate them by “examples that are important in real life.” In following this procedure, this book aims to make the economic approach to sustainability attractive for a broader audience and a useful input to policy making.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Sustainability, Development, Environmental Economics
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q01 - Sustainable Development; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q50 - General

References

“Brundtland report”: World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L. and D. Hemous (2012). The Environment and Directed Technical Change, American Economic Review, 102(1): 131-66.

Acemoglu, D. and J.A. Robinson (2012). Why Nations Fail, Crown Publishers, New York.

Anand, S. and A. Sen (2000). Human Development and Economic Sustainability, World Development, 28 (12): 2029-2049.

Barbier, E.B. (1999). Endogenous growth and natural resource scarcity, Environmental and Resource Economics, 14 (1): 51–74.

BASIC (2011). Equitable access to sustainable development: contribution to the body of scientific knowledge. Technical report, BASIC expert group, Bejing, Brasilia, Cape Town and Mumbai.

Böhm-Bawerk, E.V. (1921): Kapital und Kapitalzins, Jena: Gustav Fischer; also (1957): Capital and Interest, Kelley and Millman, New York.

Boserup, E. (1965). The Conditions of Agricultural Growth: The Economics of Agrarian Change under Population Pressure, Aldine, Chicago, IL.

Bovenberg, A.L. and S. Smulders (1995). Environmental quality and pollution-augmenting technological change in a two-sector endogenous growth model, Journal of Public Economics, 57: 369–391

Bretschger, L and S. Valente (2011). Climate change and uneven development, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 113 (4): 825–845.

Bretschger, L. (1998). How to substitute in order to sustain: knowledge driven growth under environmental restrictions, Environment and Development Economics, 3: 861–893.

Bretschger, L. (1999): Growth Theory and Sustainable Development, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Bretschger, L. (2005): Economics of Technological Change and the Natural Environment: How Effective are Innovations as a Remedy for Resource Scarcity? Ecological Economics, 54 (2-3): 148-163.

Bretschger, L. (2013). Climate policy and equity principles: fair burden sharing in a dynamic world, Environment and Development Economics 18 (5), 517–536.

Bretschger, L. (2013). Population Growth and Natural Resource Scarcity: Long-Run Development under Seemingly Unfavourable Conditions, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 115 (3): 722–755.

Bretschger, L. (2015): Energy Prices, Growth, and the Channels in Between: Theory and Evidence, Resource and Energy Economics, 39: 29–52.

Bretschger, L. and A. Vinogradova (2014). Growth and Mitigation Policies with Uncertain Climate Damage, Economics Working Paper Series 14/202, ETH Zurich.

Bretschger, L. and A. Vinogradova (2015). Effective and equitable climate policy: Integrating less developed countries into a global climate agreement, Economics Working Paper Series 15/217, ETH Zurich.

Bretschger, L. and C. Karydas (2013). Optimum Growth and Carbon Policies with Lags in the Climate System, Economics Working Paper Series 13/184, ETH Zurich.

Bretschger, L. and J. Mollet (2015). Prices and Equity in International Climate Policy: A Broad Approach, CER-ETH Working Paper, ETH Zurich.

Bretschger, L. and L. Zhang (2014). Carbon policy in a high-growth economy: The case of China, Economics Working Paper Series 14/201, ETH Zurich.

Bretschger, L. and N. Suphaphiphat (2014). Effective Climate Policies in a Dynamic North-South Model, European Economic Review, 69: 59-77.

Bretschger, L. and S. Smulders (2012). Sustainability and Substitution of Exhaustible Natural Resources; How Resource Prices Affect Long-Term R&D-Investments, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 36 (4): 536–549.

Bretschger, L. and S. Valente (2011). Climate Change and Uneven Development, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 113 (4), 825–845.

Bretschger, L., R. Ramer, and F. Schwark (2011). Growth Effects of Carbon Policies: Applying a Fully Dynamic CGE model with Heterogeneous Capital, Resource and Energy Economics, 33 (4): 963-980.

Brock, W.A. and M.S. Taylor (2005). Economic growth and the environment: a review of theory and empirics, in: S. Durlauf, P. Aghion (Eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth, vol. 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam: 1749–1821.

Brunnschweiler, C.N. and E.H. Bulte (2008). The resource curse revisited and revised: A tale of paradoxes and red herrings, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55 (3): 248-264.

Burnside, C. and D. Dollar (2000). Aid, policies, and growth, American Economic Review, 90 (4), 847–868.

Cairns, R.D. and V. Martinet (2014). An environmental-economic measure of sustainable development, European Economic Review, 69: 4–17.

Dasgupta, P.S. and G.M. Heal (1974). The Optimal Depletion of Exhaustible Resources, Review of Economic Studies, Symposium: 3–28.

Desmet, K. and E. Rossi-Hansberg (2012). On the Spatial Economic Impact of Global Warming, NBER Working Papers 18546.

Djankov, S., J. Montalvo, and M. Reynal-Querol (2008). The curse of aid, Journal of Economic Growth, 13 (3): 169–194.

Ehrlich, P. R. and A. E. Ehrlich, (1990). The Population Explosion, Hutchinson, London.

Global Commission on the Economy and Climate (2014). Better Growth, Better Climate; The New Climate Economy Report, http:// newclimateeconomy.report/

Heal, G. (2010). Is Economic Growth Sustainable? London: International Economic Association/Palgrave, Macmillan.

Hicks, Sir J. R. (1932): The Theory of Wages, Macmillan, London (1932).

Ikefuji, M. and R. Horii (2012). Natural disasters in a two-sector model of endogenous growth, Journal of Public Economics, 96: 784–796

IPCC Working Group I (2013). Climate Change, The Physical Science Basis, http://www.ipcc.ch/ .

IPCC Working Group III (2014). Mitigation of Climate Change, http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/.

IPCCC Working Group III (2014). Mitigation of Climate Change. Chapter 4 on “Sustainable Development and Equity,” http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/.

Konow, J. (2003). Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories, Journal of Economic Literature 41(4): 1188–1239.

Krugman, P. (2010). Building a Green Economy, New York Times, April 7, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/11/magazine/11Economy-t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 .

Malthus, T. (1798). Essay on the Principle of Population.

Meadows, D. H., D. L. Meadows, J. Randers, and W. W. III Behrens (1972). The Limits to Growth, Universe Books, New York.

Michel, P. and G. Rotillon (1995). Disutility of pollution and endogenous growth, Environmental and Resource Economics, 6: 279–300.

Nordhaus, W. and J. Boyer (2000). Warming the World: Economic Models of Global Warming. MIT Press.

Pindyck, R.S. (2012). Uncertain outcomes and climate change policy, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 63: 289-303.

Pindyck, R.S. and N. Wang (2013). The Economic and Policy Consequences of Catastrophes, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 5(4): 306-339.

Popp, D. (2002). Induced innovation and energy prices, American Economic Review, 92 (1): 160–180.

Porter, M. E. (1991): America's Green Strategy, Scientific American, 264 (4): 96.

Posner, E.A. and D.A. Weisbach (2012). International Paretianism: a Defense, Olin Research Paper No. 606, University of Chicago, Chicago.

Rezai, A., D.K. Foley, and L. Taylor (2012). Global warming and economic externalities, Economic Theory, 49: 329–351.

Rose, A. and S. Kverndokk (2002). Equity in environmental policy with an application to global warming, in: van den Bergh, J. (ed.). Handbook of environmental and resource economics, Edward Elgar.

Russell, B. (1930). The Conquest of Happiness, Allen and Unwin, London.

Schelling T.C. (1992). Some economics of global warming, American Economic Review, 82 (1): 1–14.

Schelling, T.C. (1980). The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Shleifer, A. (2012). The Failure of Judges and the Rise of Regulators. MIT Press.

Simon, J. L. (1981). The Ultimate Resource, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Solow, R. (1974). Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources, Review of Economic Studies, 41: 29–45.

Solow, R. (1993).An almost practical step toward sustainability. Resource Policy, 19: 162–172.

Soretz, S. (2007): Efficient Dynamic Pollution Taxation in an Uncertain Environment, Environmental and Resource Economics 36, 57-84.

Stern, N. (2007). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Sterner, T. ed. (2011). Fuel Taxes and the Poor: The distributional consequences of gasoline taxation and their implications for climate policy, Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis.

Stiglitz, J. (1974). Growth with Exhaustible Natural Resources: Efficient and Optimal Growth Paths, Review of Economic Studies 41: 123-137.

Tsur, Y. and A. Zemel (1996): Accounting for global warming risks: Resource management under event uncertainty, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 20, 289-1305.

UNEP (2011). Green Economy Report, Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication, http://www.unep.org/greeneconomy/GreenEconomyReport/.

United Nations (2007). Sustainable Consumption and Production: Promoting Climate-Friendly Household Consumption Patterns, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

United Nations (2014). The future we want, outcome documented adopted at Rio+20, http://www.un.org/en/sustainablefuture/

Van der Ploeg, F. (2011). Natural Resources: Curse or Blessing?, Journal of Economic Literature, 49(2): 366-420.

Van der Ploeg, F. and C. Withagen (2014). Growth, Renewables, and the Optimal Carbon Tax, International Economic Review, 55: 283-311.

Weitzman, M. L. (2014). Can Negotiating a Uniform Carbon Price Help to Internalize the Global Warming Externality? Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 1 (1/2), 29–49.

World Bank (2010). World Development Report 2010, Development and Climate Change, Washington.

World Bank, (2006). Where is the Wealth of Nations? Measuring Capital for the Twenty-First Century. The World Bank, Washington, DC.

Xepapadeas, A. (2006). Economic growth and the environment, in: K.-G. Mäler, J. Vincent (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.