Learning how to innovate as a socio-epistemological process of co-creation. Towards a constructivist teaching strategy for innovation

Peschl, Markus F. and Bottaro, Gloria and Hartner-Tiefenthaler, Martina and Rötzer, Katharina (2014): Learning how to innovate as a socio-epistemological process of co-creation. Towards a constructivist teaching strategy for innovation. Published in: Constructivist Foundations , Vol. 3, No. 9 (2014): pp. 421-433.

Abstract

Context: Radical constructivism (RC) is seen as a fruitful way to teach innovation, as Ernst von Glasersfeld’s concepts of knowing, learning, and teaching provide an epistemological framework fostering processes of generating an autonomous conceptual understanding. Problem: Classical educational approaches do not meet the requirements for teaching and learning innovation because they mostly aim at students’ competent performance, not at students’ understanding and developing their creative capabilities. Method: Analysis of theoretical principles from the constructivist framework and how they can be used as a foundation for designing a course in the field of innovation. The empirical results are based on qualitative journal entries that were coded and categorized according to Charmaz’s grounded theory approach. Results: It is shown that there is a close relationship between learning and innovation processes. The proposed investigated course design based on RC incorporates the following concepts: the course setting is understood as a framework to guide understanding; students work in teams and are subjective constructors of their own knowledge; instructors take on the role of coaches, guiding students through an innovation process as co-creators. Such a framework facilitates dynamic processes of assimilation and accommodation, as well as perturbation through the “other,” which potentially lead to novel, and viable, conceptual structures crucial for sustainable innovation. Constructivist Content: The paper argues in favor of RC principles in the context of teaching and learning. The proposed course setting is oriented at von Glasersfeld’s understanding of knowing, learning, and teaching (vs. training. It outlines theoretical and practical aspects of these principles in the context of a course design for innovation. Furthermore, it shows the importance of von Glasersfeld’s concept of intersubjectivity for processes of accommodation and the generation of (novel) autonomous conceptual structures. The interplay between creating coherence, perturbation, and irritation through interacting with the “other” (in the form of co-students and instructors) is assumed to be vital for such processes, as it leads to the creation of not only novel but also viable conceptual structures, therefore re-establishing a relative equilibrium critical for sustainable innovation.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Innovation, teaching, learning, course design, co-creation, Enabling Space, radical constructivism.
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A23 - Graduate

References

Allen T. J. & Henn G. W. (2007) The organization of architecture and innovation. Managing the flow of technology. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Amabile T. (1996) Creativity in context. Westview Press, Boulder.

Argyris C. & Schön D. A. (1996) Organizational learning II. Theory, method, and practice. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City CA.

Baumgartner P. (2003) Didaktik, eLearning-Strategien, Softwarewerkzeuge und Standards – Wie passt das zusammen? In: Mensch und E-Learning. Beiträge zur E-Didaktik und darüber hinaus. M. Franzen, Aarau: 9–25.

Baumgartner P. & Payr S. (1999) Lernen mit Software. Second edition. Studien Verlag, Innsbruck.

Bechtel W. & Abrahamsen A. (2002) Connectionism and the mind. Parallel processing, dynamics, and evolution in networks. Second edition. Blackwell, Oxford UK.

Bohm D. (1996) On dialogue. Routledge, New York.

Brown J. & Isaacs D. (2005) The world cafe. Shaping our futures through conversations that matter. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco CA.

Charmaz K. (2006) Constructing grounded theory. Sage, London.

Clark A. (2001) Mindware. An introduction to the philosophy of cognitive science. Oxford University Press, New York.

Clark A. (2008) Supersizing the mind. Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Cole M. & Derry J. (2005) We have met technology and it is us. In: Sternberg R. J. & Preiss D. (eds.) Intelligence and technology. The impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ: 209–227.

Cooper R. G. (1990) Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons 33(3): 44–54.

Corning P. A. (2002) The re-emergence of “emergence”: A venerable concept in search of a theory. Complexity 7(6): 18–30.

Dann H. D. (1992) Variation von Lege-Strukturen zur Wissensrepräsentation. In: Scheele B. (ed.) Struktur-Lege-Verfahren als Dialog-Konsens-Methodik. Ein Zwischenfazit zur Forschungsentwicklung bei der rekonstruktiven Erhebung subjektiver Theorien. Aschendorffsche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Münster: 2–41.

Dodgson M. & Gann D. (2010) Innovation. A very short introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Drucker P. F. (1985) Innovation and entrepreneurship. Practice and principles. Heinemann, London.

European Commission (2004) Innovation management and the knowledge-driven economy. European Commission, Brussels. Retrieved on 19 June 2012 from ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/innovation-policy/studies/studies_innovation_management_final_report.pdf

European Commission (2008) Decision No 1350/2008/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 16 December 2008 concerning the European Year of Creativity and Innovation (2009) Official Journal of the European Union, L 348: 115–117.

Ettlie J. E., Bridges W. P. & O’Keefe R. D. (1984) Organisational strategic and structural differences for radical vs. incremental innovation. Management Science 30(6): 682–695.

Fagerberg J., Mowery D. C. & Nelson R. R. (eds.) (2006) The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Fagerberg J. & Verspagen B. (2009) Innovation studies. The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research Policy 38(2): 218–233.

Fayard A. L. & Weeks J. (2007) Photocopiers and water-coolers: The affordances of informal interaction. Organization Studies 28(5): 605–634.

Foerster H. von (1972) Perception of the future and the future of perception. Instructional Science 1: 31–43.

Friedenberg J. & Silverman G. (2006) Cognitive science. An introduction to the study of the mind. Sage, Thousand Oaks CA.

Glasersfeld E. von (1974) Piaget and the radical constructivist epistemology. In: Smock C. D. & Glasersfeld E. von (eds.) Epistemology and education. Follow Through Publications, Athens GA: 1–24. Available at http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/034

Glasersfeld E. von (1983) Learning as a constructive activity. In: Bergeron J. C. & Herscovics N. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th Annual Meeting of the North American Group of Psychology in Mathematics Education, Vol. 1. Montreal: PME-NA, 41–101. Available at http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/083

Glasersfeld E. von (1989a) Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese 80(1): 121–140. Available at http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/118

Glasersfeld E. von (1989b) Constructivism in Education. In: Husen T. & Postlethwaite T. N. (eds.) International encyclopedia of education. Supplement Volume 1. Pergamon Press, Oxford: 162–163. Available at http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/114

Glasersfeld E. von (1991a) Introduction. In: Glasersfeld E. von (ed.) Radical constructivism in mathematics education. Kluwer, Dordrecht: xiii–xx. Available at http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/137

Glasersfeld E. von (1991b) A constructivist’s view of learning and teaching. In: Duit R., Goldberg F. & Niedderer H. (eds.) Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies – Proceedings of an international workshop. IPN, Kiel: 29–39. Available at http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/135

Glasersfeld E. von (1995) Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Falmer Press, London.

Glasersfeld E. von (1996) Aspects of radical constructivism and its educational recommendations. In: Steffe L. P., Nesher P., Cobb P., Goldin G. A. & Greer B. (eds.) Theories of mathematical learning. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale: 307–314. Available at http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/185

Gloor P. A. (2006) Swarm creativity. Competitive advantage through collaborative innovation networks. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Johannessen J.-A., Olsen B. & Lumpkin G. T. (2001) Innovation as newness: What is new, how new, and new to whom? European Journal of Innovation Management 4(1): 20–31.

Kaufman J. C. & Sternberg R. J. (eds.) (2010) The Cambridge handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Kelley T. (2004) The art of innovation. Lessons in creativity from IDEO, America’s leading design firm. Profile Books, London.

Kemp S. J. (2012) Constructivist criteria for organising and designing educational research: How might an educational research inquiry be judged from a constructivist perspective? Constructivist Foundations 8(1): 118–125. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/8/1/118.kemp

Kirsh D. (1995) The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence 73(1–2): 31–68.

Kolb D. A. (1984) Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ.

Krippendorff K. (1989) On the essential contexts of artifacts or on the proposition that “Design is making sense (of things).” Design Issues 5(2): 9–39.

Krippendorff K. (2006) The semantic turn. A new foundation for design. CRC Press, Boca Raton FL.

Krippendorff K. & Butter R. (2007) Semantics. Meanings and contexts of artifacts. In: Schifferstein H. N. J. & Hekkert P. (eds.) Product Experience. Elsevier, New York: 1–25.

Retrieved on 10 June 2011 from http://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/91/

Kuhn T. S. (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions. Second edition. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Laurel B. (ed.) (2003) Design research. Methods and perspectives. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Reidel, Dordrecht.

Moggridge B., Suri J. F. & Bray D. (2007) People and prototypes. In: Moggridge B. (ed.) Designing interactions. MIT Press, Cambridge MA: 641–735.

Menary R. (ed.) (2010) The extended mind. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

Norman D. A. (1991) Cognitive artifacts. In: Carroll J. M. (ed.) Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface. Cambridge University Press, New York: 17–38. Retrieved on 19 September 2011 from http://hci.ucsd.edu/10/readings/norman_cognitiveartifacts.pdf

O’Connor G. C. & McDermott C. M. (2004) The human side of radical innovation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 21(1–2): 11–30.

Onarheim B. (2012) Creativity from constraints in engineering design: Lessons learned at Coloplast. Journal of Engineering Design 23(4): 323–336.

Peschl M. F. (2007) Triple-loop learning as foundation for profound change, individual cultivation, and radical innovation: construction processes beyond scientific and rational knowledge. Constructivist Foundations 2(2–3): 136–145. Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/2/2–3/136.peschl

Peschl M. F. (2009) Innovation as a socio-epistemological technology. In: Hornung-Prähauser V. & Luckmann M. (eds.) Creativity and innovation competencies on the web. How does the “new” emerge with support of web technologies? Salzburg Research: 46–56.

Peschl M. F. & Fundneider T. (2008a) Emergent innovation and sustainable knowledge co-creation. A socio-epistemological approach to “innovation from within.” In: Lytras M. D., Carroll J. M., Damiani E., Tennyson D. Avison D. & Vossen G. (eds.) The open knowledge society: A computer science and information systems manifesto. Springer, New York: 101–108.

Peschl M. F. & Fundneider T. (2008b) Emergent innovation. A socio-epistemological innovation technology. Creating profound change and radically new knowledge as core challenges in knowledge management. In: Tochtermann K. & Maurer H. (eds.) International Conference on Knowledge Management and New Media Technology (iknow 08), Graz: 11–18.

Peschl M. F. & Fundneider T. (2012) Spaces enabling game-changing and sustaining innovations: Why space matters for knowledge creation and innovation. Journal of Organisational Transformation and Social Change (OTSC) 9(1): 41–61.

Peschl M. F. & Fundneider T. (2013) Theory-U and emergent innovation. Presencing as a method of bringing forth profoundly new knowledge and realities. In: Gunnlaugson O., Baron C. & Cayer M. (eds.) Perspectives on Theory U: Insights from the field. IGI Global, Hershey, PA: 207–233

Peschl M. F. & Fundneider T. (2014) Designing (and) enabling interfaces for collaborative knowledge creation and innovation. Computers and Human Behavior. In press.

Peterson E. P. (2013) Constructivist pedagogy and symbolism: Vico, Cassirer, Piget, Bateson. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44(8): 878–891.

Popper K. R. (1962) Conjectures and refutations; the growth of scientific knowledge. Basic Books, New York.

Reiter-Palmon R., Wigert B. & Vreede T. de. (2012) Team creativity and innovation. The effect of group composition, social processes, and cognition. In: Mumford M. (ed.) Handbook of organizational creativity. Academic Press: San Diego CA: 295–326.

Rumelhart D. E. & McClelland J. L. (eds.) (1986) Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Foundations Volume I. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

Sailer K. (2011) Creativity as social and spatial process. Facilities 29(1/2): 6–18.

Scharmer C. O. (2001) Self-transcending knowledge. Sensing and organizing around emerging opportunities. Journal of Knowledge Management 5(2): 137–150.

Scharmer C. O. (2007) Theory U. Leading from the future as it emerges. The social technology of presencing. Society for Organizational Learning, Cambridge MA.

Schein E. H. (1993) On dialogue, culture and organizational learning. Organization Dynamics 22(2): 44–51.

Schön, D. (1983) The reflective practitioner. Basic Books, New York.

Schumpeter J. A. (1934) The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

Schumpeter J. A. (1947) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Second edition. Harper, New York. Retrieved on 5 September 2009 from http://ens-web3.ens-lsh.fr/amrieu/IMG/pdf/Schumpeter_chapter_7.pdf

Scott B. (2001) Gordon Pask’s conversation theory: A domain independent constructivist model of human knowing. Foundations of Science 6: 343–360.

Senge P. M. (1990) The fifth discipline. The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday, New York.

Senge P., Scharmer C. O., Jaworski J. & Flowers B. S. (2004) Presence. Human purpose and the field of the future. Society for Organizational Learning, Cambridge MA.

Stephan A. (2006) The dual role of “emergence” in the philosophy of mind and in cognitive science. Synthese 151: 485–498.

Sternberg R. J. (2005) Creativity or creativities? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 63(4–5): 370–382.

Stokes P. D. (2005) Creativity from constraints. The psychology of breakthrough. Springer, New York.

Stokes P. D. (2009) Using constraints to create novelty: A case study. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 3(3): 174–180.

Weisberg R. W. (1993) Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. Freeman, New York.