Peschl, Markus F. and Fundneider, Thomas (2014): Why space matters for collaborative innovation networks. On designing enabling spaces for collaborative knowledge creation. Published in: nternational Journal of Organisational Design and Engineering (IJODE) , Vol. 3/4, No. 3 (2014): pp. 358-391.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_66541.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
As opposed to managing or controlling innovation processes, this paper proposes the notion of enabling as a more suitable approach to innovation. As a consequence, the concept of Enabling Spaces is introduced as a space that is designed in such a way that it enables and facilitates processes of collaborative knowledge creation and innovation. In that context a rather broad notion of space is applied: It goes far beyond architectural/physical space by integrating social, cognitive, emotional, organizational, and epistemological dimensions in an interdisciplinary manner. Both the theoretical background and the methodological approach and design process will be presented. Furthermore, we will discuss a case for an Enabling Space which functions as a collaborative innovation network. It will turn out that Enabling Spaces and Collaborative Innovation Networks (COINs) share a lot of characteristics, attitudes, and values.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Why space matters for collaborative innovation networks. On designing enabling spaces for collaborative knowledge creation |
English Title: | Why space matters for collaborative innovation networks. On designing enabling spaces for collaborative knowledge creation |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | cognition, collaboration, design, Enabling Space, extended cognition, innovation, knowledge creation, space |
Subjects: | Z - Other Special Topics > Z0 - General |
Item ID: | 66541 |
Depositing User: | Markus F. Peschl |
Date Deposited: | 17 Sep 2015 18:28 |
Last Modified: | 05 Oct 2019 05:22 |
References: | Alexander, C.; Ishikawa, S.; Silverstein, M. (1977): A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Allen, T.J.; Henn, G.W. (2007): The organization of architecture and innovation. Managing the flow of technology. Amsterdam; London: Butterworth-Heinemann Elsevier. Amabile, T. (1996): Creativity in context. Boulder: Westview Press. Argyris, C.; Putnam, R.; Smith, D. McLain (1985): Action Science. Concepts, methods, and skills for research and intervention. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc. Publishers. Aristotle (2007): „Metaphysics“. Aristotle (2000): „On the soul (De anima)“. Ballantine, D. (2004): „Action research reviewed: a market-oriented approach“. In: European Journal of Marketing. 38 (3/4), pp. 321–337. Bechara, A.; Damasio, H.; Damasio, A.R. (2000): „Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex“. In: Cerebral Cortex. 10 , pp. 295–307. Bechtel, W.; Abrahamsen, A. (2002): Connectionism and the mind. Parallel processing, dynamics, and evolution in networks. second. Malden, MA; Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers. Bechtel, W.; Graham, G. (eds.) (1998): A companion to cognitive science. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. Bohm, D. (1996): On dialogue. London; New York: Routledge. Brown, T. (2009): Change by design. How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York, NY: Harper Collins. Brown, T. (2008): „Design Thinking“. In: Harvard Business Review. 86 (6), pp. 84–93. Chesbrough, H. W.; Vanhaverbeke, W.; West, J. (2006): Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chesbrough, H.W. (2003): Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Churchland, P.M. (1981): „Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes“. In: Journal of Philosophy. 78 , pp. 67–90. Clark, A. (1999): „An embodied cognitive science?“. In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 3 (9), pp. 345–351. Clark, A. (1997): Being there. Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Clark, A. (2001): Mindware. An introduction to the philosophy of cognitive science. New York: Oxford University Press. Clark, A. (2008): Supersizing the mind. Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Cole, M.; Derry, J. (2005): „We have met technology and it is us“. In: Sternberg, R.J.; Preiss, D. (eds.) Intelligence and technology. The impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates pp. 209–227. Corso, M.; Martini, A.; Pellegrini, L. (2009): „Innovation at the intersection between exploration, exploitation and discontinuity“. In: Int. J. Learning and Intellectual Capital. 6 (4), pp. 324–340. Coughlan, P.; Suri, J. F.; Canales, K. (2007): „Prototypes as (design) tools for behavioral and organizational change. A design-based approach to help organizations change work behaviors“. In: The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 43 (1), pp. 1–13. Cross, N. (1982): „Designerly ways of knowing“. In: Design Studies. 3 (4), pp. 221–227. Cross, N. (2001): „Designerly ways of knowing. Design discipline versus design science“. In: Design Issues. 17 (3), pp. 49–55. d.school (2010): Design thinking bootcamp bootleg. Methodbook. Stanford: d.school, Hasso Platter, Institute of Design. Damasio, A.R. (1994): Descarte’s error. Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam Publishers. Damasio, A.R. (1995): „Toward a neurobiology of emotion and feeling. Operational concepts and hypotheses“. In: The Neuroscientist. 1 , pp. 19–25. Denzin, N. K.; Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.) (2005): The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. third. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Dodgson, M.; Gann, D. (2010): Innovation. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dorst, K. (2006): „Design problems and design paradoxes“. In: Design Issues. 22 (3), pp. 4–17. Dorst, K. (2003): „The problem of design problems“. In: Cross, N.; Edmonds, E. (eds.) Expertise in design. Sydney: Creativity and Cognition Studio Press pp. 135–147. DTI (2005): Creativity, design and business performance. London: DTI Economics Paper. Easterby-Smith, M.; Lyles, M.A. (eds.) (2003): The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Fagerberg, J.; Mowery, D. C.; Nelson, R. R. (eds.) (2006): The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fagerberg, J.; Verspagen, B. (2009): „Innovation studies. The emerging structure of a new scientific field“. In: Research Policy. 38 , pp. 218–233. Fayard, A.L.; Weeks, J. (2007): „Photocopiers and water-coolers: the affordances of informal interaction“. In: Organization Studies. 28 (5), pp. 605–634. Fleck, L. (1979): Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Fleck, L. (1947): „Schauen, sehen, wissen“. In: Fleck, L. (ed.) Erfahrung und Tatsache. Gesammelte Aufsätze (1983). Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp pp. 147–174. Friedenberg, J.; Silverman, G. (2006): Cognitive science. An introduction to the study of the mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Gazzaniga, M.S. (ed.) (2000): The new cognitive neurosciences. second. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Gedenryd, H. (1998): „How designers work“. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Cognitive Studies. Glanville, R. (2006): „Construction and design“. In: Constructivist Foundations. 1 (3), pp. 103–110. Glanville, R. (1998): „Re-searching design and designing research“. In: Design Issues. 15 (2), pp. 88–91. Glanville, R. (2007): „Try again. Fail again. Fail better: the cybernetics in design and the design in cybernetics“. In: Kybernetes. The International Journal of Systems and Cybernetics. 36 (9/10), pp. 1173–1206. Glasersfeld, E.v. (1984): „An introduction to radical constructivism“. In: Watzlawick, P. (ed.) The invented reality. New York: Norton pp. 17–40. Glasersfeld, E.v. (1995): Radical constructivism: a way of knowing and learning. London: Falmer Press. Gloor, P.A. (2006): Swarm Creativity. Competitive advantage through collaborative innovation networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gloor, P.A.; Heckmann, C.; Makedon, F. (2004): „Ethical issues in collaborative innovation networks“. Retrieved am from http://www.ickn.org/documents/COIN4Ethicomp.pdf (date of download: 05.12.2011). Godfrey-Smith, P. (2003): Theory and reality. An introduction to the philosophy of science. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press. Graver, B.; Dunne, T.; Pacenti, E. (1999): „Cultural probes“. In: Interactions. 6 (1), pp. 21–29. Gupta, A.K.; Smith, K.G.; Shalley, C.E. (2006): „The interplay between exploration and exploitation“. In: Academy of Management Journal. 49 (4), pp. 693–706. Harvey, D.C. (2010): „The space for culture and cognition“. In: Poetics. 38 , pp. 184–203. Hayes, G. R. (2011): „The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction“. In: ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI). 18 (3), pp. 15:1–15:20. Hoepfl, M.C. (1997): „Choosing qualitative research: a primer for technology education researchers“. In: Journal of Technology Education. 9 (1), pp. 47–63. Houde, S.; Hill, C. (1997): „What do prototypes prototype?“. In: Helander, M.; Landauer, T.; Prabhu, P. (eds.) Handbook of human-computer interaction. second. Amsterdam: Elsevier pp. 367–381. House, N.A. Van (2003): „Science and technology studies and information studies“. In: Cronin, B. (ed.) Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (vol 38). pp. 3–86. Hutchins, E. (1995): Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Isaacs, W.N. (1999a): „Dialogic leadership“. In: The Systems Thinker. 10 (1), pp. 1–5. Isaacs, W.N. (1999b): Dialogue and the art of thinking together: A pioneering approach to communicating in business and life. New York: Doubleday Currency. James, W. (1884): „What is an emotion?“. In: Mind. 9 , pp. 188–205. Jaworski, J.; Kahane, A.; Scharmer, C.O. (2004): The presence workbook. Cambridge, MA: Society for Organizational Learning (SoL). Kaiser, A.; Fordinal, B. (2010): „Creating a ba for generating self-transcending knowledge“. In: Journal of Knowledge Management. 14 (6), pp. 928–942. Kawulich, B.B. (2005): „Participant observation as a data collection method“. In: Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 6 (2), p. Art. 43. Kelley, T. (2004): The art of innovation. Lessons in creativity from IDEO, America’s leading design firm. London: Profile Books. Krippendorff, K. (2004): Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology. second. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Krippendorff, K. (1989): „On the essential contexts of artifacts or on the proposition that “Design is making sense (of things)”“. In: Design Issues. 5 (2), pp. 9–39. Krippendorff, K. (2011): „Principles of design and a trajectory of artificiality“. In: Journal of Product Innovation Management. 28 , pp. 411–418. Krippendorff, K. (2006): The semantic turn. A new foundation for design. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis CRC Press. Krippendorff, K.; Butter, R. (2007): „Semantics. Meanings and contexts of artifacts“. In: Schifferstein, H.N.J.; Hekkert, P. (eds.) Product Experience. New York: Elsevier pp. 1–25. Kristensen, T. (2004): „The physical context of creativity“. In: Creativity and Innovation Management. 13 (2), pp. 89–96. Krogh, G.v.; Ichijo, K.; Nonaka, I. (2000): Enabling knowledge creation. How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press. Latour, B. (1987): Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press. Laurel, B. (ed.) (2003): Design research. Methods and perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. LeDoux, J.E. (2000): „Emotion circuits in the brain“. In: Annual Review of Neuroscience. 23 , pp. 155–184. Lewin, K. (1946): „Action research and minority problems“. In: Journal of social issues. 2 (4), pp. 34–46. Lewis, M.; Moultrie, J. (2005): „The organizational innovation laboratory“. In: Creativity and Innovation Management. 14 (1), pp. 73–83. March, J.G. (1991): „Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning“. In: Organization Science. 2 (1), pp. 71–87. Maturana, H.R.; Varela, F.J. (eds.) (1980): Autopoiesis and cognition: the realization of the living. Dordrecht, Boston: Reidel Pub. Menary, R. (ed.) (2010): The extended mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Moultrie, J.; Nilson, M.; Dissel, M. et al. (2007): „Innovation Spaces: Towards a framework for understanding the role of the physical environment in innovation“. In: Creativity and Innovation Management. 16 (1), pp. 53–65. Nishida, K. (1999): Logik des Ortes. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. Nonaka, I.; Konno, N. (1998): „The concept of “ba”: building a foundation for knowledge creation“. In: California Management Review. 40 (3), pp. 40–54. Nonaka, I.; Toyama, R. (2003): „The knowledge-creating theory revisited: knowledge creation as a synthesizing process“. In: Knowledge Management Research and Practice. 1 (1), pp. 2–10. Nonaka, I.; Toyama, R.; Hirata, T. (2008): Managing flow. A process theory of the knowledge based firm. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Norman, D.A. (1991): „Cognitive artifacts“. In: Carroll, J.M. (ed.) Designing interaction: psychology at the human-computer interface. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press pp. 17–38. Oblinger, D.G. (ed.) (2006): Learning spaces. Washington, DC: Educause (www.educause.edu). Peschl, M. F.; Fundneider, T. (2012a): „Where Leisure Leads to Innovation: the Viennese Café. Hothouse of tomorrow and place of encounter with the new“. In: MAK; departure (eds.) Das große Wiener Kaffehaus Experiment / The great Viennese café: a laboratory. Wien: Metroverlag pp. 58–67. Peschl, M.F. (2009): „Innovation as a socio-epistemological technology“. In: Hornung-Prähauser, V.; Luckmann, M. (eds.) Creativity and innovation competencies on the web. How does the “new” emerge with support of web technologies? Salzburg: Salzburg Research pp. 46–56. Peschl, M.F. (2006): „Learning and teaching as socio-epistemological engineering. Enabling spaces of profound cogntive change, innovation, and knowledge ceation“. In: Mettinger, A.; Oberhuemer, P.; Zwieauer, C. (eds.) eLearning an der Universtät Wien. Forschung - Entwicklung - Einführung. Münster: Waxmann pp. 112–135. Peschl, M.F.; Fundneider, T. (2008a): „Emergent Innovation and Sustainable Knowledge Co-creation. A Socio-Epistemological Approach to "Innovation from within"“. In: Lytras, M.D.; Carroll, J.M.; Damiani, E. et al. (eds.) The Open Knowledge Society: A Computer Science and Information Systems Manifesto. New York, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer (CCIS 19) pp. 101–108. Peschl, M.F.; Fundneider, T. (2008b): „Emergent Innovation. A Socio-Epistemological Innovation Technology. Creating Profound Change and Radically New Knowledge as Core Challenges in Knowledge Management“. In: Tochtermann, K.; Maurer, H. (eds.) iknow 08 (International Conference on Knowledge Management and New Media Technology). Graz pp. 11–18. Peschl, M.F.; Fundneider, T. (2012b): „Spaces enabling game-changing and sustaining innovations: Why space matters for knowledge creation and innovation“. In: Journal of Organisational Transformation and Social Change (OTSC). 9 (1), pp. 41–61. Peschl, M.F.; Raffl, C.; Fundneider, T. et al. (2010): „Creating sustainable futures by innovation from within. Radical change is in demand of radical innovation“. In: Trappl, R. (ed.) Cybernetics and Systems 2010. Wien pp. 354–359. Popper, K.R. (1962): Conjectures and refutations; the growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Basic Books. Popper, K.R. (1959): The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson. Rapoport, R. N. (1970): „Three dilemmas in action research“. In: Human Relations. 23 (6), pp. 499–513. Reason, P.; Bradbury, H. (eds.) (2001): Handbook of action research. Participative inquiry and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Sailer, K. (2011): „Creativity as social and spatial process“. In: Facilities. 29 (1/2), pp. 6–18. Sailer, K.; Et al. (2010): „Comparative studies of offices. Pre and post. How changing spatial configurations affect organisational behaviours“. In: Journal of Space Syntax. 1 (1), pp. 199–213. Sanders, E.B.-N.; Stappers, P.J. (2008): „Co-creation and the new landscapes of design“. In: CoDesign. 4 (1), pp. 5–18. Scharmer, C.O. (2001): „Self-transcending knowledge. Sensing and organizing around emerging opportunities“. In: Journal of Knowledge Management. 5 (2), pp. 137–150. Scharmer, C.O. (2007a): Theory U. Leading from the future as it emerges. The social technology of presencing. Cambridge, MA: Society for Organizational Learning. Scharmer, C.O. (2007b): „Toolbook 1.0 – The Presencing Institute.“. Schnetzler, N. (2005): The Idea Machine: How ideas can be produced industrially. Weinheim: Wiley -VCH. Schön, D. (1984): „The architectural studio as an exemplar of education for reflection-in-action“. In: Journal of Architectural Education. 38 (1), pp. 2–9. Schön, D. (1983): The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books. Schumpeter, J.A. (1934): The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Senge, P.; Scharmer, C.O. (2001): „Community action research: Learning as a community of practitioners, consultants and researchers“. In: Reason, P.; Bradbury, H. (eds.) Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: SAGE pp. 238–249. Senge, P.; Scharmer, C.O.; Jaworski, J. et al. (2004): Presence. Human purpose and the field of the future. Cambridge, MA: Society for Organizational Learning. Shneiderman, Ben (2007): „Creativity support tools: accelerating discovery and innovation“. In: Commun. ACM. 50 , pp. 20–32, doi: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1323688.1323689. Spradley, J.P. (1980): Participant observation. Fort Worth, Philadelphia: Harcourt Brace College Publishers. Spradley, J.P. (1979): The ethnographic interview. Fort Worth, Philadelphia: Harcourt Brace College Publishers. Stein, E. (1986): Endliches und ewiges Sein. Versuch eines Aufstiegs zum Sinn des Seins. Freiburg, Basel, Wien: Herder. Sternberg, R. J. (ed.) (1999): Handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press. Sternberg, R.J. (2005): „Creativity or creativities?“. In: International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 63 , pp. 370–382. Steup, M. (2012): „Epistemology“. In: Zalta, E. N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/. Stillings, N.A. (1995): Cognitive Science. An Introduction. second. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Stokes, P. D. (2007): „Using constraints to generate and sustain novelty“. In: Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 1 (2), pp. 107–113. Susman, G. I.; Evered, R. D. (1978): „An assessment of the scientific merits of action research“. In: Administrative Science Quarterly. 23 (4), pp. 582–603. Tedlock, B. (2005): „Ethnography and ethnographic representation“. In: Denzin, N. K.; Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. third. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE pp. 455–486. Thagard, P. (2005): Mind. Introduction to cognitive science. second. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Tomasello, M. (1999): The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Tomasello, M.; Carpenter, M.; Call, J. et al. (2005): „Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition“. In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 28 , pp. 675–735. Truong, K. N.; Hayes, G. R.; Abowd, G. D. (2006): „Storyboarding: an empirical determination of best practices and effective guidelines“. In: Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems. New York: ACM pp. 12–21. Tsoukas, H. (2005): Complex knowledge. Studies in organizational epistemology. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Varela, F.J.; Thompson, E.; Rosch, E. (1991): The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Verganti, R. (2006): „Innovating through design“. In: Harvard Business Review. 84 (12), pp. 114–121. Wilson, R.A.; Keil, F.C. (eds.) (1999): The MIT Encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Zhang, Y.; Wildemuth, B. M. (2009): „Qualitative analysis of content“. In: Wildemuth, B. M. (ed.) Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited pp. 308–319. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/66541 |