Ecumenical foundations? On the coexistence of Austrian and neoclassical views on utility

Senderski, Marcin (2014): Ecumenical foundations? On the coexistence of Austrian and neoclassical views on utility. Published in: International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education , Vol. 5, No. 4 (2014): pp. 354-373.

Abstract

Utility has long been a debatable concept, with many competing interpretations. The Austrian school and the neoclassical school, however broad these categories may seem, have made the most substantial and, by the same token, the most contrasting contributions to the theory of value. The paper’s goal is not to adjudicate past arguments or observe the evolution of the theory, but rather to resolve contemporary misunderstandings. The references are made to such trouble spots as subjectivism vs. objectivism, cardinality vs. ordinality, and mathematical formalism vs. verbal formalism. Both schools entrenched themselves in their views long ago. Nevertheless, this paper shows that discussing utility on common ground and on the basis of shared presumptions is not necessarily the melody of the future. The paper is concluded with recommendations on how the current dissent may be attenuated.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Austria; Austrian school; economic thought; heterodox economics; neoclassical school; utility
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B53 - Austrian

References

Abdellaoui, Mohammed, Carolina Barrios, and Peter P. Wakker. 2007. “Reconciling Introspective Utility with Revealed Preference: Experimental Arguments Based on Prospect Theory.” Journal of Econometrics 138 (May): 356–378.

Allais, Maurice. 1953. “Le Comportement de L’homme Rationnel Devant Le Risque: Critique Des Postulats et Axiomes de L’école Américaine.” Econometrica 21 (4): 503–546.

An, Sungbae, Yongsung Chang, and Sun-Bin Kim. 2009. “Can a Representative Agent Model Represent a Heterogeneous Agent Economy?” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 1 (2): 29–54.

Arnsperger, Christian, and Yanis Varoufakis. 2006. “What Is Neoclassical Economics? The Three Axioms Responsible for Its Theoretical Oeuvre, Practical Irrelevance And, Thus, Discursive Power.” Panoeconomicus 1: 5–18.

Arrow, Kenneth Joseph. 1963. Social Choice and Individual Values. 2nd ed. New York, London and Sydney: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Aspromourgos, Tony. 1986. “On the Origins of the Term ‘Neoclassical.’” Cambridge Journal of Economics 10 (3): 265–270.

Barnett, William. 2003. “The Modern Theory of Consumer Behavior: Ordinal or Cardinal.” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 6 (1): 41–65.

Bentham, Jeremy. 2000. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Kitchener, ON: Batoche Books.

Benz, Matthias. 2005. “The Relevance of Procedural Utility for Economics”. 256. Working Paper Series.

Benz, Matthias, and Alois Stutzer. 2003. “Do Workers Enjoy Procedural Utility?” Applied Economics Quarterly 49: 149–172.

Bianchi, Milo, and Magnus Henrekson. 2005. “Is Neoclassical Economics Still Entrepreneurless?” 584. SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance.

Blaug, Mark. 2007. “The Fundamental Theorems of Modern Welfare Economics, Historically Contemplated.” History of Political Economy 39 (2): 185–207.

Block, Walter. 1999. “Austrian Theorizing: Recalling the Foundations.” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 2 (4): 21–39.

Böhm-Bawerk, E. v., and Henrietta Leonard. 1891. “The Autrian Economists.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 1: 361–384.

Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen von. 1890. Capital and Interest: A Critical History of Economical Theory. London and New York: Macmillan and Co. Ltd.

Boland, Lawrence A. 1981. “On the Futility of Criticizing the Neoclassical Maximization Hypothesis.” The American Economic Review 71 (5): 1031–1036.

Bonar, James. 1888. “The Austrian Economists and Their View of Value.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 3 (1): 1–31.

Bruni, Luigino, and Francesco Guala. 2001. “Vilfredo Pareto and the Epistemological Foundations of Choice Theory” 33 (1): 21–49.

Cannan, Edwin. 1964. A Review of Economic Theory. Cannan, E., A Review of Economic Theory, 2nd Ed., London, 1964. 2nd ed. London.

Caplan, Bryan. 1997. “Why I Am Not an Austrian Economist”. Department of Economics, George Mason University.

Caplan, Bryan. 1999. “The Austrian Search for Realistic Foundations.” Southern Economic Journal 65 (4): 823–838.

Colander, David. 2000. “The Death of Neoclassical Economics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (2): 127–143.

Colander, David. 2007. “Edgeworth’s Hedonimeter and the Quest to Measure Utility.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 21 (2): 215–225.

Colander, David, Richard P. F. Holt, and J. Barkley Rosser Jr. 2007. “Live and Dead Issues in the Methodology of Economics.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 30 (2): 303–312.

Colander, David, Richard P. F. Holt, and J. Barkley Rosser Jr. 2010. “How to Win Friends and (possibly) Influence Mainstream Economists.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 32 (3): 397–410. doi:10.2753/PKE0160-3477320305.

Cooter, Robert, and Peter Rappoport. 1984. “Were the Ordinalists Wrong About Welfare Economics?” Journal of Economic Literature XXII (June): 507–530.

Daoud, Adel. 2011. “Scarcity, Abundance, and Sufficiency: An Alternative Foundation for Heterodox Economics”. Göteborg: University of Gothenburg, Department of Sociology.

Davenport, Herbert J. 1902. “Proposed Modifications in Austrian Theory and Terminology.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 16 (3): 355–384.

Dequech, David. 2006. “The New Institutional Economics and the Theory of Behaviour under Uncertainty.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 59 (January): 109–131. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2004.03.012.

Dickson, Peter Reid. 1992. “Toward a General Theory of Competitive Rationality.” Journal of Marketing 56: 69–83.

Diener, Ed, Eunkook M. Suh, Richard E. Lucas, and Heidi L. Smith. 1999. “Subjective Well-Being: Three Decades of Progress.” Psychological Bulletin 125 (2): 276–302. http://dipeco.economia.unimib.it/persone/stanca/ec/diener_suh_lucas_smith.pdf.

Dobb, Maurice. 1973. Theories of Value and Distribution since Adam Smith: Ideology and Economic Theory. 1st ed. Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

Donkers, Bas, and Arthur van Soest. 1999. “Subjective Measures of Household Preferences and Financial Decisions.” Journal of Economic Psychology 20: 613–642.

Drakopoulos, Stavros A., and Anastassios D. Karayiannis. 1999. “Mainstream Consumer Theory: Delay, Acceptance and History of Economic Thought Texts.” History of Economics Review (30): 68–81.

Eabrasu, Marian. 2008. “An Assessment of Subjectivism. Its Meaning And Its Limits”. 1. Working Paper Series.

Edgeworth, Francis Ysidro. 1879. “The Hedonical Calculus.” Mind 4: 394–408.

———. 1881. Mathematical Psychics: An Essay on the Application of Mathematics to the Moral Sciences. London: C. Kegan Paul and Co.

Ekelund, Robert B. 1997. “Karen I. Vaughn. Austrian Economics in America: The Migration of Tradition (Book Review).” Review of Austrian Economics 10 (2): 133–138.

Foundation for Research in Economics and Education. 1978. “A Conversation between Friedrich von Hayek, PhD Economics and Axel Leijonhufvud, Professor of Economics, UCLA”. United States: The Foundation for Research in Economics and Education. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDNLKMYYArc.

Frey, Bruno S., Matthias Benz, and Alois Stutzer. 2004. “Introducing Procedural Utility: Not Only What but Also How Matters.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 160 (3): 377–401.

Frey, Bruno S., and Alois Stutzer. 2002. “What Can Economists Learn From Happiness Research.” Journal of Economic Literature 40: 402–435.

Frey, Bruno S., and Alois Stutzer. 2005a. “Beyond Outcomes: Measuring Procedural Utility.” Oxford Economic Papers 57 (1): 90–111.

Frey, Bruno S., and Alois Stutzer. 2005b. “Testing Theories of Happiness.” In Economics of Happiness. Framing the Analysis, edited by Luigino Bruni and Pierluigi Porta, 116–146. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Friedman, Milton. 1953. “The Methodology of Positive Economics.” In Essays in Positive Economics, 3–43. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Gordon, David. 1996. “The Philosophical Origins of Austrian Economics”. Auburn, AL. http://mises.org/pdf/philorig.pdf.

Gül, Faruk, and Wolfgang Pesendorfer. 2006. “Random Expected Utility.” Econometrica 74 (1): 121–146.

Gül, Faruk, and Wolfgang Pesendorfer. 2013. “Expected Uncertain Utility Theory.” Mimeo.

Hammond, Peter J. 1991. “Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility: Why and How They Are and Should Be Made.” In Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being, edited by Jon Elster and John E. Roemer, 200–254. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Hayek, Friedrich August. 2007. “Carl Menger.” In Principles of Economics, 11–36. Auburn, AL: The Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Heathcote, Jonathan, Kjetil Storesletten, and Giovanni L. Violante. 2009. “Quantitative Macroeconomics with Heterogeneous Households.” Annual Review of Economics 1: 319–354.

Hennipman, P. 1987. “A Tale of Two Schools: Comments on a New View of the Ordinalist Revolution.” De Economist 135 (2): 141–162.

Hicks, John Richard. 1946. Value and Capital: An Inquiry into Some Fundamental Principles of Economic Theory. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

———. 1954. “The Political Element in the Development of Economic Theory by Gunnar Myrdal. Review by John Hicks.” The Economic Journal 64 (256): 793–796.

Hicks, John Richard, and Roy Allen. 1934. “A Reconsideration of the Theory of Value.” Economica 1 (1): 52–76.

Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 1998. “On the Evolution of Thorstein Veblen’s Evolutionary Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 22: 415–431.

Horwitz, Steven. 2000. Microfoundations and Macroeconomics: An Austrian Perspective. London: Routledge.

Huerta de Soto, Jesús. 2008. The Austrian School: Market Order and Entrepreneurial Creativity. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

Hülsmann, Jörg Guido. 1999. “Economic Science and Neoclassicism.” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 2 (4): 3–20.

Hunt, Shelby D., and Robert M. Morgan. 1995. “The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition.” Journal of Marketing 59 (2) (April): 1–15. doi:10.2307/1252069.

Jevons, William Stanley. 1888. The Theory of Political Economy. 3rd ed. London: Macmillan.

Kahneman, D. 1994. “New Challenges to the Rationality Assumption.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 150: 18–36.

Kahneman, Daniel. 1999. “Objective Happiness.” In Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, edited by Daniel Kahneman, Ed Diener, and Norbert Schwarz, 3–25. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Kahneman, Daniel, and Alan B. Krueger. 2006. “Developments in the Measurement of Subjective Well-Being.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (1): 3–24.

Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Edited by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. Econometrica 47 (2): 263–291. doi:10.2307/1914185. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1914185.

Kahneman, Daniel, Peter P. Wakker, and Rakesh Sarin. 1997. “Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (2): 375–405.

Kaldor, Nicholas. 1939. “Welfare Propositions of Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility.” The Economic Journal 49 (195): 549–552.

Kapteyn, Arie. 1985. “Utility and Economics.” De Economist 133 (1) (March): 1–20. doi:10.1007/BF01675959.

Kapteyn, Arie, Bernard M.S. van Praag, and Floor G. van Herwaarden. 1978. “Individual Welfare Functions and Social Reference Spaces.” Economics Letters 1: 173–177.

Kirman, Alan P. 1992. “Whom or What Does the Representative Individual Represent?” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 6 (2): 117–136.

Kirzner, Israel M. 1988. “The Economic Calculation Debate: Lessons for Austrians.” Review of Austrian Economics 2: 1–18.

Kurrild-Klitgaard, Peter. 2001. “On Rationality, Ideal Types and Economics: Alfred Schütz and the Austrian School.” The Review of Austrian Economics 14 (2-3): 119–143.

Lange, Oskar. 1934. “The Determinateness of the Utility Function.” Review of Economic Studies 1: 218–225.

Langlois, Richard N. 1985. “Knowledge and Rationality in the Austrian School: An Analytical Survey.” Eastern Economic Journal IX (4): 309–330.

Loewenstein, George. 2000. “Emotions in Economic Theory and Economic Behavior.” The American Economic Review 90 (2): 426–432.

Mahoney, Dan. 2011. “A Comparison of the Utility Theory of Rothbard and Kirzner.” Libertarian Papers 3 (30): 1–19.

Marchionatti, Roberto, and Enrico Gambino. 1997. “Pareto and Political Economy as a Science: Methodological Revolution and Analytical Advances in Economic Theory in the 1890s.” Journal of Political Economy 105 (6): 1322–1348.

Marshall, Alfred. 1920. Principles of Economics. 8th ed. London: Macmillan and Co. Ltd.

Matthaei, Julie. 1984. “Rethinking Scarcity: Neoclassicism, NeoMalthusianism, and NeoMarxism.” Review of Radical Political Economics 16 (2/3): 81–94.

McCulloch, J. Huston. 1977. “The Austrian Theory of the Marginal Use and of Ordinal Marginal Utility.” Zeitschrift Für Nationalökonomie 37 (3-4): 249–280.

Meeks, J. Gay Tulip. 1984. “Utility in Economics: A Survey of the Literature.” In Surveying Subjective Phenomena, edited by Charles F. Turner and Elizabeth Martin, Vol. 2, 41–92. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

Menger, Carl. 2007. Principles of Economics. Auburn, AL: The Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Mill, John Stuart. 1909. Philosophy, Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy. Edited by William J. Ashley. 7th ed. London: Longmans, Green and Co.

Mises, Ludwig von. 1996. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: Fox & Wilkes.

Morgenstern, Oskar. 1931. “Die Drei Grundtypen Der Theorie Des Subjektiven Wertes.” Schriften Des Vereins Für Sozialpolitik 183: 1–42.

Moscati, Ivan. 2013. “How Cardinal Utility Entered Economic Analysis, 1909-1944.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 20 (5). CHOPE Working Papers.

Myrdal, Gunnar. 1954. The Political Element in the Development of Economic Theory. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.

Neumann, John von, and Oskar Morgenstern. 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. 1st ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Niehans, Jürg. 1989. A History of Economic Theory: Classic Contributions. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

O’Driscoll, Gerald P., and Mario J. Rizzo. 1985. The Economics of Time and Ignorance. 1st ed. Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell Ltd.

Pareto, Vilfredo. 1971. Manual of Political Economy. New York, NY: Augustus M. Kelley.

Phelps Brown, Henry. 1934a. “Demand Functions and Utility Functions.” Econometrica, 2: 51–58.

Phelps Brown, Henry. 1934b. “Notes on the Determinateness of the Utility Function, I.” Review of Economic Studies 2: 66–69.

Pigou, A.C. 1951. “Some Aspects of Welfare Economics.” American Economic Review 41: 287–302.

Proops, John L R, and Stefan Speck. 1996. “Comparison of Neoclassical and Neo-Austrian Growth Models.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 7: 173–192.

Raico, Ralph. 1995. “The Austrian School and Classical Liberalism.” Advances in Austrian Economics 2A: 3–38.

Raico, Ralph. 2012. Classical Liberalism and the Austrian School. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Rajsic, Predrag. 2009. “What’s Wrong with the Utility Function?” Mises Daily. http://mises.org/daily/3918.

Read, Daniel. 2007. “Experienced Utility: Utility Theory from Jeremy Bentham to Daniel Kahneman.” Thinking & Reasoning 13 (1). Working Paper Series: 45–61.

Renn, Ortwin. 1998. “Three Decades of Risk Research: Accomplishments and New Challenges.” Journal of Risk Research 1 (1): 49–71.

Rizvi, S. Abu Turab. 2006. “The Sonnenschein-Mantel-Debreu Results after Thirty Years.” History of Political Economy 38 (Suppl. 1) (January 1): 228–245. doi:10.1215/00182702-2005-024.

Robbins, Lionel. 1935. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan and Co. Ltd.

Rosenstein-Rodan, Paul. 1960. “Marginal Utility.” International Economic Papers 10: 71–106.

Rothbard, Murray N. 1956. “Toward a Reconstruction of Utility and Welfare Economics.” In The Freedom and Free Enterprise: The Economics of Free Enterprise. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand.

Rothbard, Murray N. 1962. Man, Economy, and State. Los Angeles, CA: Nash Publishing.

Rothbard, Murray N. 1995. Classical Economics. Auburn, AL: Edward Elgar.

Rothbard, Murray N. 1997. “Praxeology: The Methodology of Austrian Economics.” In The Logic of Action One: Method, Money, and the Austrian School, 77:58–77. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Salerno, Joseph T. 2002. “The Rebirth of Austrian Economics - In Light of Austrian Economics.” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 5 (4): 111–128.

Samuelson, Paul A. 1937. “A Note on Measurement of Utility.” The Review of Economic Studies 4 (2): 155–161.

Samuelson, Paul A. 1938. “A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer’s Behaviour.” Economica 5 (17): 61–71.

Samuelson, Paul A. 1948. “Consumption Theory in Terms of Revealed Preference.” Economica 15 (60): 243–253.

Samuelson, Paul A. 1950. “The Problem of Integrability in Utility Theory.” Economica 17 (68): 355–385.

Seligman, Edwin R.A. 1903. “On Some Neglected British Economists, 1.” The Economic Journal 13 (51): 335–363.

Sen, Amartya K. 1985. Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco, CA: Holden-Day.

Senior, Nassau William. 1836. An Outline of the Science of Political Economy. 1965 rpt. New York, NY: Augustus M. Kelley.

Setterfield, Mark. 2009. “Neoclassical Growth Theory and Heterodox Growth Theory: Opportunities For and Obstacles To Greater Engagement”. 0901. Working Paper Series.

Sidrauski, Miguel. 1967. “Rational Choice and Patterns of Growth in a Monetary Economy.” The American Economic Review 57 (2): 534–544.

Stigler, George J. 1950a. “The Development of Utility Theory. II.” The Journal of Political Economy 58 (5): 373–396.

Stigler, George J. 1950b. “The Development of Utility Theory. I.” The Journal of Political Economy 58 (4): 307–327.

Stigler, George J., and Gary S. Becker. 1977. “De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum.” The American Economic Review 67 (2): 76–90.

Stringham, Edward Peter. 2010. “Economic Value and Costs Are Subjective.” In Handbook of Contemporary Austrian Economics, edited by Pieter J. Boettke, 43–66. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

Sweezy, Alan. 1934. “The Interpretation of Subjective Value Theory in the Writings of the Austrian Economists.” Review of Economic Studies 1: 176–185.

Tarascio, Vincent J. 1969. “Paretian Welfare Theory: Some Neglected Aspects.” Journal of Political Economy 77 (1): 1–20.

Tinbergen, J. 1991. “On the Measurement of Welfare.” Journal of Econometrics 50: 7–13.

Tohmé, Fernando. 2006. “Rolf Mantel and the Computability of General Equilibria: On the Origins of the Sonnenschein-Mantel-Debreu Theorem.” History of Political Economy 38 (Suppl. 1) (January 1): 213–227. doi:10.1215/00182702-2005-023.

Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1992. “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5 (4): 297–323. doi:10.1007/BF00122574.

Vaughn, Karen I. 1994. Austrian Economics in America: The Migration of a Tradition. Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

Veblen, Thorstein. 1898. “Why Is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 12 (4): 373–397.

Vernengo, Matías. 2010. “Conversation or Monologue? On Advising Heterodox Economists.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 32 (3): 389–396.

Walras, Léon. 1954. Elements of Pure Economics, or the Theory of Social Wealth. London: Allen & Unwin.

White, Lawrence. 2003. “The Methodology of the Austrian School Economists”. New York, NY: The Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Wonnell, Christopher T. 1986. “Contract Law and the Austrian School of Economics.” Fordham Law Review 54 (4): 507–543.