Nevena, Kulic and Giulia, Dotti Sani (2015): Intra-household sharing of financial resources: A non-technical review of the research field and its historical development.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_68420.pdf Download (442kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Since the 1960s, the allocation of resources in couples has been the object of much research in both the fields of economics and sociology. Today, the growth of women’s economic independence and their increased potential to control economic resources within their households raise important questions about the dynamics of intra-household sharing and calls for a reconsideration of the existing theories on the allocation of household resources. This article has the aim of reviewing in a non-technical way the two lines of research, respectively in economics and sociology, which have focused on the sharing of financial resources within a common unit of analysis: the household. After outlining their alternative applications and highlighting the similarities and differences between the two--starting from the unitary models of behavior and encompassing bargaining theory, collective goods, and transaction cost approach -we discuss new developments in the form of the dynamic models and preference theory. Finally, we reflect on the challenges that the field currently faces and suggest possible pathways for future research.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Intra-household sharing of financial resources: A non-technical review of the research field and its historical development |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Sharing, Financial resources, Family, Bargaining, Transaction Costs, Preference Theory |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D13 - Household Production and Intrahousehold Allocation |
Item ID: | 68420 |
Depositing User: | Dr Nevena Kulic |
Date Deposited: | 18 Dec 2015 16:08 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 22:46 |
References: | Becker, Gary S. 1973. A Theory of Marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy, 81: 813–846. Becker, Gary S. 1974. A Theory of Marriage: Part II. Journal of Political Economy, 82: 511–526. Becker, G. (1981a). A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge Massachusetts and London: Harvard University press. Becker, G. (1981b). Altruism in the family and selfishness in the market place. Economica, New Series, 48(189), 1-15. Bennett, F. (2013). Researching within-household distribution: overview, developments, debates, and methodological challenges. Journal of Marriage and Family , 75(3), 582–597. Bennett, F., De Henau J., Himmelweit, S. &Sung, S. (2012). Financial togetherness and autonomy within couples. In J.Scott , S. Dex , and AC. (eds), Gendered Lives: Gender Inequalities in Production and Reproduction. (pp. 97 – 122).Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Bettio, F., Plantenga, F. & Smith, M. (2013) (eds.) Gender and the European Labour Market. London, Routledge. Bettio, F., Corsi, M., D’Ippoliti, C., Lyberaki, A., &Samek L. M. (2012). The Impact of the Economic Crisis on the Situation of Women and Men and on Gender Equality Policies. ENEGE report for the European Commission – DG Justice. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Blood, R. &Wolfe, D. (1960). Husbands & Wives: The Dynamics of Married Living. Glencoe, Ill.: Free press of Glencoe. Blossfeld, H.P. &Hakim, K. (1997). Between Equalization and Marginalization. Oxford: Oxford University press. Blossfeld, H.P. & Drobnic, S. (2001). Careers of Couples in Contemporary Society: From Male Breadwinner to Dual-Earner Families. Oxford University Press. Blumstein, P. & Schwartz, P. (1984). American Couples, Money, Work and Sex. New York: Pocket Books. Bolzendahl, C. & Myers, D. (2004). Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Opinion change in women and men, 1974–1998. Social Forces, 83(2), 759–789. Bonke, J. (2015). Pooling of income and sharing of consumption within households. Review of Economics of the Household,13(1), 73-93. Bonke, J. & Uldall-Poulsen, H. (2007). Why do families actually pool their income? Evidence from Denmark. Review of Economics of the Household, 5(2), 113–128. Breen, R., Luijkx, R., Muller, W. & Pollak, R. (2010). Long-term trends in educational inequality in Europe: class inequalities and gender differences, European Sociological Review, 26(1), 31–48. Brenner, J. & Ramas, M. (1984). Rethinking women’s oppression. New Left Review, I(144), 33–71. Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender and the division of labour at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100(3), 652–688. Browning, M. & Lechene, V. (2001). Caring and sharing: Tests between alternative models of intra-household allocation. Discussion paper, Institute of Economics, University of Copenhagen. Chandlers, A. (1962). Strategy and Structure. New York: Doubleday. Cheal, D. (1999). The one and the many: modernity and post modernity. In: Graham A (ed.), The Sociology of the Family: A Reader, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. Cherlin, A.J. (2010). Demographic Trends in the United States: A Review of Research in the 2000s, Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 403-419. Chiappori, P. (1988). Rational household labour supply. Econometrica, 56(1), 63–89. Chiappori, P. (1992). Collective labour supply and welfare. Journal of Political Economy, 100(3), 437–467. Crompton, R. & Harris, F. (1998). Explaining women’s employment patterns: ‘orientations to work’ revisited. The British Journal of Sociology, 49(1), 118–136. Cunningham, M. (2008). Changing attitudes toward the male breadwinner, female homemaker family model: Influences of women’s employment and education over the life course. Social Forces, 87(1), 299-323. Donni, O. & Chiappori, P,A, (2011). Nonunitary models of household behavior: a survey of the literature. In J.A. Mollina (ed.), Household Economic Behaviors. (pp. 1–40). New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London: Springer. Feller, D. (1973). A general theory of the collective bargaining agreement. California Law Review, 61(3), 663–856. Gerson, K. (1985). Hard choices: How Women Decide about Work, Career and Motherhood. Berkley, California: University of California press. Gerson, K. (1993). No Men’s land: Men’s Changing Commitments to Family and Work. New York: Basic books. Gerson, K. (2009). The Unfinished Revolution: How a New Generation is Reshaping Family, Work and Gender in America. New York: Oxford University Press. Giddens, A. (1992). The Transformation of Intimacy. Cambridge: Polity press. Grossbard, S. (2011). Independent individual decision-makers in household models and the New Home Economics in J. Alberto Molina (ed). Household Economic Behaviors . New York: Springer, 2011. Grossbard-Shechtman, S. (2001). The new home economics at Colombia and Chicago. Feminist Economics, 7(3), 103-130. Grossbard-Shechtman, S (2001) "The Economics and Sociology of Marriage: Historical Trends and Theories of In-Marriage Household Labor" : in S. Grossbard-Shechtmand and C. Clague (eds.) On the Expansion of Economics, Armonk, N.J.: M.E. Sharpe. Hakim, C. (1991). Grateful slaves and self-made women: fact and fantasy in woman’s work orientations. European Sociological review, 7(2), 101–121. Hakim, C. (1996). Labour market and employment stability: rhetoric and reality on the sex differential in labour market behaviour. European sociological review, 12(1), 1–31. Hakim, C. (2000). Work-life Style Choices in the 21st century. Oxford, Oxford University press. Hakim, C. (2010). Erotic capital. European Sociological Review, 26(5), 499–518. Himmelweit, S., Santos, C., Sevilla, A. & Sofer, C. (2013). Sharing of resources within the family and the economics of household decision making. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(3), 625–639. Hochschild, A. & Machung, A. (1989). The Second Shift – Working parents and the Revolution at Home. New York: Viking peng. Hönekopp, J. (2006). Once more: Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(2), 199-209. Inglehart, R.F. (2008). Changing Values among Western Publics from 1970 to 2006, West European Politics, 31(1-2), 130-146. Karamessini, M.& Rubery, J. (eds) (2014). Women and Austerity – The economic crisis and the future for gender inequality. London and New York: Routledge. Kanbur, R. & Haddad, L. (1994). Are better off households more unequal or less unequal: a bargaining theoretic approach to “kuznets effects” at the microlevel. Oxford Economic Papers, 46(3). Kulic, N. (2014). European women: the link between money, career, and financial satisfaction . European Sociological Review, 30 (3), 287–301. Langlois, J.H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A.J., Larson, A., Hallam, M. & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390–423. Lewis, J. (2001). The decline of the male breadwinner model: Implications for work and care. Social Politics, 8(2),152-169. Lich-Tyler, S. (2001). The Dynamics of Bargained Household Decisions. University of Texas at Austin. Lich-Tyler, S. (2003). The Consumption Dynamics and Savings Behavior of Pluralistic Households. University of Michigan at Ann Harbor. Liefbroer, A.C., Poortman, A.R. & Seltzer, J.A. (2015). Why do intimate partners live apart? Evidence on LAT relationships across Europe, Demographic Research, 32(8), 251-286. Lundberg, S. & Pollak, R. (1993). Separate spheres bargaining and the marriage market. Journal of political economy, 101(6), 988–1010. Lundberg, S. & Pollak, R. (2003). Efficiency in marriage. Review of Economics of the Household, 1(3), 153–168. Macneil, I. (1974). The many futures of contracts. University of Southern California Law review, 47(3), 691–816. Manser, M. & Brown, M. (1980). Marriage and household decision making: a bargaining analysis. International economic review, 21(1), 31–44. Mazzocco, M. (2004). Savings, risk sharing and preferences for risk. American Economic Review, 94 (4), 1169–1182. Mazzocco, M. (2007). Household intertemporal behaviour: a collective characterization and a test of commitment. Review of Economic Studies, 74(3), 857–895. McElroy, B. & Horney, M. (1981). Nash bargained household decisions. International economic review, 22(2), 333–349. McRae, S. (2003). Constraints and choices in mothers’ employment careers: a consideration of Hakim’s preference theory. British Journal of Sociology, 54(3), 317–338. Nyman, C. (2003). The social nature of money: Meanings of Money in Swedish Families, Women's Studies International Forum, 26 (1), 79–94. Nyman, C. & Reinikainen, L. (2007). Elusive independence in a context of gender equality in Sweden. In J.Stocks , C. Dıaz and B. Hallerod (Ed.)., Modern couples sharing money, sharing life (pp. 41 – 71). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. OECD (2014). OECD Family Database. Online: www.oecd.org/social/family/database (Accessed January 2015). Pahl, J. (1983). The allocation of money and the structuring of inequality within marriage. The Sociological Review, 31(2), 237–262. Pahl, J. (2008). Family finances, individualisation, spending patterns and access to credit. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37, 577–591 Parsons, T. & Bales, R. (1956). Family, Socialization and Interaction process. London: Routledge& Kegan Paul Ltd. Pollak, R. (1985). Transaction cost approach to families and households. Journal of Economic Literature, 23(2), 581–608. Pollak, R. (1994). For better or worse: the roles of power in models of distribution within marriage. The American Economic Review, 8( 2), 148–152. Lundberg, S. &Pollak, R. (1996). Bargaining and distribution in marriage. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(4), 139-158. Smith, J. (1984). The paradox of women’s poverty: wage-earning women and economic transformation. Signs, 10(2), 291–310. Samuelson P. (1956). Social Indifference Curves. Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 70, pp. 1-22. Sorensen, A. (2003). Economic relations between women and men: new realities and the re-interpretation of dependence. Advances in Life Course Research, 8, 281–297. Sorensen, A. & McLanahan, S. (1987). Married women’s economic dependency, 1940-1980. The American Journal of Sociology, 93(3), 659–687. Thornton, A. & Axinn, W.G. (2007). Marriage and Cohabitation. The university of Chicago press, Chicago and London. Treas, J. (1993) Money in the bank: transaction costs and the economic organization of Marriage. American Sociological Review, 58(5), 723–734. Treas, J. & Widmer, E.D. (2000). Married women's employment over the life course: Attitudes in cross-national perspective. Social Forces, 78(4),1409-1436. Vogler, C. (1998). Money in the household: some underlying issues of power. The Sociological Review , 46(4), 687–713. Vogler, C. & Pahl, J. (1994). Money, power and inequality within marriage. The Sociological Review, 42(2), 263–288. Vogler, C., Brockmann, M. & Wiggins, R. (2008a). Managing money in new heterosexual forms of intimate relationships. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(2), 552–576. Vogler, C., Lyonette, C. & Wiggins, R. (2008b). Money, power and spending decisions in intimate relationships. The Sociological Review, 56(1), 117–143. Williamson, O. (1981). The Economics of organization: the transaction cost approach. The American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548–577. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/68420 |