Ahmed, Khalid and Shahbaz, Muhammad and Kyophilavong, Phouphet (2016): Revisiting the emissions-energy-trade nexus: Evidence from the newly industrializing.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_68680.pdf Download (361kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper applies Pedroni's panel cointegration approach to explore the causal relationship between trade openness, carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption and economic growth for the panel of newly industrialized economies (i.e. Brazil, India, China and South Africa) over the period of 1970–2013. Our panel cointegration estimation results found majority of the variables cointegrated and confirm the long-run association among the variables. The Granger causality test indicates bi-directional causality between carbon dioxide emissions and energy consumption. A uni-directional causality is found running from trade openness to carbon dioxide emission and energy consumption, and economic growth to carbondioxide emissions. The results of causality analysis suggest that the trade liberalization in newly industrialized economies induces higher energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions. Furthermore, the causality results are checked using an innovative accounting approach which includes forecast-error variance decomposition test and impulse response function. The long-run coefficients are estimated using fully modified ordinary least square (FMOLS) method and results conclude that the trade openness and economic growth reduce carbon dioxide emissions in the long-run. The results of FMOLS test sound the existence of environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. It means, trade liberalization induces carbon dioxide emission with increased national output, but it offsets that impact in the long-run with reduced level of carbon dioxide emissions.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Revisiting the emissions-energy-trade nexus: Evidence from the newly industrializing |
English Title: | Revisiting the emissions-energy-trade nexus: Evidence from the newly industrializing |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Newly industrialized economies; Gross domestic production (GDP); Carbon dioxide emissions; Trade liberalization; Energy consumption |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O10 - General |
Item ID: | 68680 |
Depositing User: | Muhammad Shahbaz |
Date Deposited: | 06 Jan 2016 08:43 |
Last Modified: | 03 Oct 2019 21:00 |
References: | Ahmed, K. and Long, W. (2013a). An empirical analysis of CO< DN> 2</DN> emission in Pakistan using EKC hypothesis. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 12(2), 188-200. Ahmed, K. and Qazi, A. Q. (2014). Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 Emissions in Mongolia: An Empirical Analysis. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 25(4), 10-10. Ahmed, K., & Long, W. (2013b). Climate change and trade policy: from legal complications to time factor. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 12(3), 258-271. Ahmed, K., Shahbaz, M., Qasim, A., & Long, W. (2015). The linkages between deforestation, energy and growth for environmental degradation in Pakistan.Ecological Indicators, 49, 95-103. Ahmed, K., Bhattacharya, M., Qazi, A. Q., Long, W. (2015). Energy Consumption in China and Underlying Factors in a Changing Landscape: Empirical Evidence since the Reform Period. Department of Economics Discussion Paper Series (Discussion Paper 43-15). Monash University. Arouri, M.E.H., Ben Youssef, A., M'henni, H., Rault, C. (2012). Empirical Analysis of The EKC Hypothesis for Sulfur Dioxide Emissions in Selected Middle East and North African Countries. MPRA Paper 46185, University Library of Munich, Germany. Birdsall, N. and Wheeler, D. (1993). Trade policy and industrial pollution in Latin America: where are the pollution havens? The Journal of Environment & Development, 2(1), 137-149. Breitung, J. (2005). A parametric approach to the estimation of cointegration vectors in panel data. Econometric Reviews, 24(2), 151-173. Chang, Y. (2002). Nonlinear IV unit root tests in panels with cross-sectional dependency. Journal of Econometrics, 110(2), 261-292. Choi, I. (2001). Unit Root Tests for Panel Data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2), 249-272. Cole, M. A. and Elliott, R. J. (2005). FDI and the capital intensity of “dirty” sectors: a missing piece of the pollution haven puzzle. Review of Development Economics, 9(4), 530-548. Copeland, B. R. and Taylor, M. S. (2003). Trade, growth and the environment (No. w9823). National Bureau of Economic Research. Copeland, B. R. and Taylor, M. S. (2013). Trade and the environment: Theory and evidence. Princeton University Press. Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (1994). North-South trade and the environment. The quarterly journal of Economics, 755-787. Costantini, M. and Lupi, C. (2013). A Simple Panel CADF Test for Unit Roots. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 75(2), 276-296. De Hoyos, R. E., & Sarafidis, V. (2006). Testing for cross-sectional dependence in panel-data models. Stata Journal, 6(4), 482. Dechezleprêtre, A., Glachant, M., & Ménière, Y. (2008). The Clean Development Mechanism and the international diffusion of technologies: An empirical study. Energy Policy, 36(4), 1273-1283. Dinda, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecological economics, 49(4), 431-455. Dumitrescu, E. I. and Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460. Dunlap, R. E. and York, R. (2008). The globalization of environmental concern and the limits of the postmaterialist values explanation: Evidence from four multinational surveys. The Sociological Quarterly, 49(3), 529-563. Duro, J. A. and Padilla, E. (2006). International inequalities in per capita CO< sub> 2</sub> emissions: A decomposition methodology by Kaya factors. Energy Economics, 28(2), 170-187. Eskeland, G. S. and Harrison, A. E. (2003). Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis. Journal of Development Economics, 70(1), 1-23. Fodha, M. and Zaghdoud, O. (2010). Economic growth and pollutant emissions in Tunisia: an empirical analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy, 38(2), 1150-1156. Friedman, M. (1937) “The Use of Ranks to Avoid the Assumption of Normality Implicit in the Analysis of Variance”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 32, 675-701. Granger, C. W. J., & Newbold, P. (2014). Forecasting economic time series. Academic Press. Grossman, G. M. and Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement (No. w3914). National Bureau of Economic Research. Gujarati, D. N. (2012). Basic econometrics. Tata McGraw-Hill Education. Han C. and Lee H. (2013). Dependence of Economic Growth on Co2 Emissions. Journal of Economic Development, 38, 47-57. Hansen, B. E. (1995). Rethinking the Univariate Approach to Unit Root Testing: Using Covariates to Increase Power. Econometric Theory, 11(5), 1148-1171. Hartung, J. (1999). A Note on Combining Dependent Tests of Significance. Biometrical Journal, 41(7), 849–855. Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. Stata Journal, 7(3), 281. Hossain, S. (2011). Panel estimation for CO< sub> 2</sub> emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and urbanization of newly industrialized countries. Energy Policy, 39(11), 6991-6999. http://www.oecd.org/environment/indicators-modelling-outlooks/40200582.pdf Im, K.S., M.H. Pesaran, and Y. Shin (1997). Testing for Unit Roots in Heterosgeneous Panels, manuscript, department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge, UK. IMF, (2013). World Economic Outlook, April-2013. (http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2013/01/pdf/text.pdf) Jalil, A. and Feridun, M. (2011). The impact of growth, energy and financial development on the environment in China: A cointegration analysis. Energy Economics, 33(2), 284-291. Jalil, A. and Mahmud, S. F. (2009). Environment Kuznets curve for CO< sub> 2</sub> emissions: A cointegration analysis for China. Energy Policy, 37(12), 5167-5172. Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of economic dynamics and control, 12(2), 231-254. Kawahara, S. (2014). Trade, environment and market access: policy reforms in a small open economy. Environment and Development Economics, 19(02), 173-181. Kearsley, A. and Riddel, M. (2010). A further inquiry into the Pollution Haven Hypothesis and the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Ecological Economics, 69(4), 905-919. Lee, C. C., Chiu, Y. B. and Sun, C. H. (2009). Does one size fit all? A reexamination of the environmental Kuznets curve using the dynamic panel data approach. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 31(4), 751-778. Levin, A. and Lin, C. F. (1993). Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: New Results. Working Paper 56, Department of Economics, University of California at San Diego Levin, A., Lin, C. F. and Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and finite- Sample Properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1-24. Liddle, B. (2012). The importance of energy quality in energy intensive manufacturing: Evidence from panel cointegration and panel FMOLS. Energy Economics, 34(6), 1819-1825. Ling, C. H., Ahmed, K., Muhamad, R. B., & Shahbaz, M. (2015). Decomposing the trade-environment nexus for Malaysia: what do the technique, scale, composition, and comparative advantage effect indicate?.Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(24), 20131-20142. Lucas, R. E., Wheeler, D. and Hettige, H. (1993). Economic Development, Environmental Regulation, and the International Migration of Toxic Industrial Pollution, 1960-88 (Vol. 1062). World Bank Publications. Managi, S. and Jena, P. R. (2008). Environmental productivity and Kuznets curve in India. Ecological Economics, 65(2), 432-440. Managi, S., Hibiki, A. and Tsurumi, T. (2009). Does trade openness improve environmental quality? Journal of environmental economics and management, 58(3), 346-363. Mani, M. and Wheeler, D. (1998). In search of pollution havens? Dirty industry in the world economy, 1960 to 1995. The Journal of Environment & Development, 7(3), 215-247. Mazzanti, M., Montini, A. and Zoboli, R. (2008). Environmental Kuznets curves for air pollutant emissions in Italy: Evidence from environmental accounts (NAMEA) panel data. Economic Systems Research, 20(3), 277-301. Mudakkar,et al. (2013). Energy for economic growth, industrialization, environment and natural resources: living with just enough. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 580-595. Zaman, et al. (2011). Bivariate cointegration between energy consumption and development factors: a case study of Pakistan. International Journal of Green Energy, 8(8), 820-833. Omri, A. (2013). CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth nexus in MENA countries: evidence from simultaneous equations models. Energy Economics 40, 657–664. Ozturk, I. (2015). Sustainability in the food-energy-water nexus: Evidence from BRICS (Brazil, the Russian Federation, India, China, and South Africa) countries. Energy, 93, 999-1010. Chang, M. C. (2015). Room for improvement in low carbon economies of G7 and BRICS countries based on the analysis of energy efficiency and environmental Kuznets curves. Journal of Cleaner Production, 99, 140-151. Pan, J., Phillips, J. and Chen, Y. (2008). China's balance of emissions embodied in trade: approaches to measurement and allocating international responsibility. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24(2), 354-376. Pedroni, P. (2001). Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. Advances in econometrics, 15, 93-130. Pedroni, P. (2007). Social capital, barriers to production and capital shares: implications for the importance of parameter heterogeneity from a nonstationary panel approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 429-451. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross-Section Dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312. Peters, G. P., Minx, J. C., Weber, C. L. and Edenhofer, O. (2011). Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(21), 8903-8908. Phillips, P. C. (1987). Time series regression with a unit root. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 277-301. Qazi, A. Q., Ahmed, K. and Mudassar, M. (2012). Disaggregate energy consumption and industrial output in Pakistan: An empirical analysis (No. 2012-29). Economics Discussion Papers. Qureshi, et al. (2016). Energy crisis, greenhouse gas emissions and sectoral growth reforms: Repairing the fabricated mosaic. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 112, Issue 5, pp. I3657-3666. Khan et al. (2016). Triangular relationship among energy consumption, air pollution and water resources in Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 112, Issue 2, pp. 1375-1385 Gul, et al. (2015). Causal nexus between energy consumption and carbon dioxide emission for Malaysia using maximum entropy bootstrap approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 22, Issue 24, pp. 19773-19785. Sadorsky, P. (2011). Trade and energy consumption in the Middle East. Energy Economics, 33(5), 739-749. Selden, T. M. and Song, D. (1994). Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? Journal of Environmental Economics and management, 27(2), 147-162. Shahbaz, M. (2012). Does trade openness affect long run growth? cointegration, causality and forecast error variance decomposition tests for Pakistan. Economic Modelling, 29 (6), 2325-2339. Shahbaz, M., Bhattacharya, M., & Ahmed, K. (2015).. Growth-Globalisation-Emissions Nexus: The Role of Population in Australia. Department of Economics Discussion Paper Series (Discussion Paper 23-15). Monash University. Shahbaz, M., Khan, S. and Tahir, M. I. (2013). The dynamic links between energy consumption, economic growth, financial development and trade in China: fresh evidence from multivariate framework analysis. Energy Economics, 40, 8-21. Shahbaz, M., Khraief, N., Uddin, G. S. and Ozturk, I. (2014). Environmental Kuznets curve in an open economy: A bounds testing and causality analysis for Tunisia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, 325-336. Shahbaz, M., Lean, H-H. and Shabbir, M-S. (2012). Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis in Pakistan: Cointegration and Granger causality. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 2947-2953. Stern, D. I. (2004). The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World development, 32(8), 1419-1439. Topalova, P. and Khandelwal, A. (2011). Trade liberalization and firm productivity: The case of India. Review of economics and statistics, 93(3), 995-1009. Tsurumi, T., & Managi, S. (2010). Decomposition of the environmental Kuznets curve: scale, technique, and composition effects. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 11(1-4), 19-36. Wacziarg, R. and Welch, K. H. (2008). Trade liberalization and growth: New evidence. The World Bank Economic Review, 22(2), 187-231. Wooldridge, J. (2012). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Cengage Learning. Youngman, R., Schmidt, J., Lee, J., & De Coninck, H. (2007). Evaluating technology transfer in the clean development mechanism and joint implementation. Climate Policy, 7(6), 488-499. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/68680 |