Gerunov, Anton (2014): Openness and Growth: An Empirical Investigation on a Panel of Countries over the Period 1999-2009. Published in: Proceedings of the Faculty of Economics and Business Administration , Vol. 12, (2014): pp. 107-125.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_68796.pdf Download (622kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The paper investigates the link between indicators of economic openness and real growth of output. It is based on the theoretical expectation that openness should affect total factor productivity mainly through technological spillovers and market discipline. This is indeed observable in the data for 213 countries spanning 10 years for flows of goods and services, whereas the effects of financial liberalization are more ambiguous. A clear policy recommendation stems from these results: countries should target their efforts at current account liberalization, but proceed with extra care when liberalizing the financial account of the Trade Balance.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Openness and Growth: An Empirical Investigation on a Panel of Countries over the Period 1999-2009 |
English Title: | Openness and Growth: An Empirical Investigation on a Panel of Countries over the Period 1999-2009 |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | trade, openness, economic growth, liberalization |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade |
Item ID: | 68796 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Anton Gerunov |
Date Deposited: | 13 Jan 2016 14:20 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 09:26 |
References: | Baldwin, R. (2003). Openness and Growth: what’s the empirical relationship? NBER: Working Paper # 9578. Bernal, R. (2001). Small developing Eeconomies in the World Trade Organization. World Bank Conference: Leveraging Trade, Global Market Integration and the New WTO Negotiations for Development. Washington, DC, July 23-24. Dollar, D. (1992). Outward-oriented developing economies really do grow more rapidly: evidence from 95 LDCs, 1976-85. Economic Development and Cultural Change, p. 523-544. Dowrick, S. & Golley, J. (2004). Trade openness and growth: who benefits? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20, 1, p. 38-56. Edwards, S. (1998). Openness, productivity and growth: what do we really know? Economic Journal, 108, p. 383-398. Fratzscher, M. & Bussiere, M. (2004). Financial openness and growth: short-run gain, long-run pain? European Central Bank: Working Paper Series #348. Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (1990). Trade, knowledge spillovers and growth. NBER: Working Paper # 3485. Lee, H., Ricci, L. & Rigobon, R. (2004). Once again, is openness good for growth? Journal of Development Economics, 75, 2, p. 451-472. Nehru, V. & Dhareshwar, A. (1993). A new database on physical capital stock: sources, methodology and results. Revista de Analisis Economico, 8, 1, p. 37-59. Ocampo, J. & Taylor, L. (1998). Trade liberalization in developing economies: modest benefits but problems with productivity growth, macro prices and income distribution. Read, R. (2001). Growth, economic development and structural transition in small vulnerable states. United Nations University / World Institute for Development Economics Research: Discussion Paper No. 2001/59. Rodriguez, F. & Rodrik, D. (2001). Trade Policy and Economic Growth: A skeptic’s guide to the cross-national evidence. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000, 15, p. 261-325. Sachs, J. & Warner, A. (1995). Economic reform and the process of global integration. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1995:1, 1-118. Vamvakidis, V. (2002). How robust is the growth-openness connection? Historical evidence. Journal of Economic Growth, 7, p. 57-80. Weinhold, D. & Rauch, J. (1997). Openness, specialization and productivity growth in less developed counties. NBER: Working Paper # 6131. World Bank. (2010). Defining a small economy. Retrieved 02.03.2010 from http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/PROJECTS/0,,contentMDK:21512464~pagePK:41367~piPK:51533~theSitePK:40941,00.html . Yanikkaya, H. (2003). Trade openness and economic growth: a cross-country empirical investigation. Journal of Development Economics, 72, p. 57-89. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/68796 |