Corporate Insolvency Resolution in India: Lessons from a cross-country comparison

Sengupta, Rajeswari and Sharma, Anjali (2016): Corporate Insolvency Resolution in India: Lessons from a cross-country comparison.

Abstract

In this paper we analyse the corporate insolvency resolution procedures of India, UK and Singapore within a common framework of well-specified principles. India at present lacks a single, comprehensive law that addresses all aspects of insolvency of a firm. It has a multiple laws, regulations and adjudication fora, each of which have created opportunities for debtor firms to exploit the arbitrage between these to frustrate recovery efforts of creditors. This adversely affets the resolution process, the time to recovery and the value recovered. The importance of a comprehensive, well-functioning insolvency resolution framework has been documented in literature. In India, the Bankruptcy Law Reforms Committee (BLRC) was constituted in 2014 with the objective of proposing a comprehensive framework for resolving the insolvency of firms and individuals. We undertake a comparison of the corporate insolvency resolution framework in UK, Singapore and India, with the underlying motivation to highlight the similarities and differences across the laws, procedures and institutional context of the three countries. The objective of this comparison is to draw lessons for the Indian reform process, in context of the formation of the BLRC. The BLRC has recently proposed an Insolvency and Bankruptcy Bill (IBB) which has been presented in Parliament and is currently being deliberated upon by a Joint Parliamentary Committee.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Resolving insolvency, Liquidation, Reorganisation, Adjudicator, Loss given default, Recovery rate, Timeliness, Insolvency professional, Information system
• Subjects: G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets; G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services; G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance; G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G33 - Bankruptcy ; Liquidation

References

Aghion, Philippe, Oliver Hart, and John Moore (1992): “The economics of bankruptcy reforms,” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Vol 8, pp 523–46.

Aghion, Philippe and Patrick Bolton (1992): “An incomplete contracts approach to financial contracting,” The Review of Economic Studies, Vol 59, No 3, pp 473–494.

Bolton, Patrick and David Scharfstein (1996): “Optimal debt structure and the number of creditors,” Journal of Political Economy, pp 1–25.

Davydenko, Sergei and Julian Franks (2008): “Do bankruptcy codes matter? A study of defaults in France, Germany, and the UK,” The Journal of Finance, Vol 63, No 2, pp 565–608.

Djankov, Simeon, Caralee McLiesh and Andrei Shleifer (2007): “Private credit in 129 countries,” Journal of financial Economics, Vol 84, No 2, pp 299–329.

Eradi, Vettath Balakrishna (2000): “Report of the Committee on law relating to Insolvency of Companies”.

La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer and Robert Vishny (1997): “Legal determinants of external finance,” Journal of finance, pp 1131–1150.

La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer and Robert Vishny (1996): “Law and finance,” Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.

Levine, Ross (1999): “Law, finance, and economic growth,” Journal of financial Intermediation, Vol 8, No 1, pp 8–35.

Qian, Jun and Philip Strahan (2007): “How laws and institutions shape financial contracts: The case of bank loans,” The Journal of Finance, Vol 62, No 6, pp 2803–2834.

Ravi, Aparna (2015): “Indian Insolvency Regime in Practice: An Analysis of Insolvency and Debt Recovery Proceedings”, Economic and Political weekly, Vol 1, No 51.

Wadia, Nusli N (2000): “Unshackling the Indian industry,” Technical report, Prime Minister’s council on trade and industry.

World Bank (2016): “World Bank Doing Business Report,” Technical report, World Bank and IFC.