Rolfe, Jim and Grimes, Arthur (2002): Australia-New Zealand Defence Cooperation: Some Considerations. Published in: Agenda , Vol. 9, No. 1 (2002): pp. 47-64.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_69396.pdf Download (200kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Australia and New Zealand have a long history of defence cooperation (currently under the rubric ‘Closer Defence Relations’ or ‘CDR’) based on treaty arrangements, on shared values and on similar, although not identical, strategic outlooks. In 2000 each country published reviews giving a framework for decisions on the size and shape of the armed forces for 20 or 30 years. In this paper we consider an analytical framework that could usefully inform policy makers when they consider national force capabilities and the degree to which each country can and should cooperate in determining defence structures. We use an explicitly economics approach to our analysis. This takes us away from normative policy statements of ‘needs’ (which are often ‘wants’) and gives a clear basis for both making and understanding policy decisions. Initially we examine the domestic determinations of an optimal defence force structure for a small country such as New Zealand. The point of this is to determine to what extent national force structure ‘balance’ is feasible and either desirable or necessary. We then consider the international considerations facing any small country and how balance applies internationally. Finally, we consider how the concept of balance could apply between Australia and New Zealand.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Australia-New Zealand Defence Cooperation: Some Considerations |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Defence force structure; Australia; New Zealand |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F52 - National Security ; Economic Nationalism H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H41 - Public Goods |
Item ID: | 69396 |
Depositing User: | Dr Arthur Grimes |
Date Deposited: | 10 Feb 2016 06:17 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 10:12 |
References: | Cheeseman, G. (2000), ‘Choosing to Make Choices’, Australian Defence Force Journal 143(July/August):25-26. Clark, H. (2000), ‘The F-16 “Fighting Falcon” and the Royal New Zealand Air Force’, Media Statement, http://www.airforce.mil.nz/projects/F-16/introduction.html (downloaded 16 January 2000). Clarke, S. (1999) Strategy, Air Strike and Small Nations, Air Power Studies Centre, RAAF Base, Fairbairn. Commonwealth of Australia (2000), Defence 2000: Our Future Defence Force, Defence Publishing Service, Canberra. Dibb, P. (2000), Testimony to the Joint Parliamentary Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade, cited in The Age, 28 February. Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee (1999), Inquiry into Defence Beyond 2000, Report, Parliamentary Paper I. 4D, New Zealand House of Representatives. Grimes, A. (2000) ‘F16 Costs: Robustness Testing’, A Report for Hon D. Quigley and the New Zealand Treasury, http://www.executive.govt.nz/f16/review15.htm#robustness. Hartley, K. (1995), ‘Industrial Policies in the Defense Sector’, pp. 459-489 (Chapter 16) in K. Hartley and T. Sandler (eds), Handbook of Defense Economics Volume 1, Handbooks in Economics 12, North-Holland Elsevier, Amsterdam. Hartley, K. and T. Sandler (eds) (1995), Handbook of Defense Economics Volume 1, Handbooks in Economics 12, North-Holland Elsevier, Amsterdam. McGuire, M. (1995), ‘Defense Economics and International Security’, pp. 13-43 (Chapter 2) in K. Hartley and T. Sandler (eds), Handbook of Defense Economics Volume 1, Handbooks in Economics 12, North-Holland Elsevier, Amsterdam. Murdoch, J. (1995), ‘Military Alliances: Theory and Empirics’, pp. 89-108 (Chapter 5) in K. Hartley and T. Sandler (eds), Handbook of Defense Economics Volume 1, Handbooks in Economics 12, North-Holland Elsevier, Amsterdam. New Zealand Defence Force (1999a), Departmental Forecast Report: 1 July 1999 – 30 June 2000, House of Representatives Paper G.55 FR (99), Wellington. New Zealand Defence Force (1999b), Report of the New Zealand Defence Force for the Year Ended 30 June 1999, House of Representatives Paper G.55, Wellington. New Zealand Defence Force (2000) , Report of the New Zealand Defence Force for the Year Ended 30 June 2000, House of Representatives Paper G.55, Wellington. New Zealand Government (1991), Defence of New Zealand 1991: A Policy Paper, Wellington. New Zealand Government (1997), The Shape of New Zealand’s Defence: A White Paper, Wellington. New Zealand Government (2000), The Government’s Defence Policy Framework, Wellington. New Zealand Government (2001), A Modern Sustainable Defence Force Matched to New Zealand’s Needs, Wellington. Olson, M. and R. Zeckhauser (1966), ‘An Economic Theory of Alliances’, Review of Economics and Statistics 48(3):266-279. Pugh, P. (1993), ‘The Procurement Nexus’, Defence Economics 4(2):179-194. Rogerson, W. (1995), ‘Incentive Models of the Defense Procurement Process’, pp. 309-346 (Chapter 12) in K. Hartley and T. Sandler (eds), Handbook of Defense Economics Volume 1, Handbooks in Economics 12, North-Holland Elsevier, Amsterdam. Rolfe, J. (1993), Defending New Zealand: A Study of Structures, Processes and Relationships, Institute of Policy Studies, Wellington. Rolfe, J. (1995), ‘Australia and New Zealand: Towards a More Effective Defence Relationship’, Working Paper No. 286, Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, Australian National University, Canberra. Rolfe, J. (1999), The Armed Forces of New Zealand, Allen and Unwin, St Leonards, NSW. Sandler, T. and K. Hartley (1995), The Economics of Defense, Cambridge Surveys of Economic Literature, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Warner, J. and B. Asch (1995), ‘The Economics of Military Manpower’, pp. 347-398 (Chapter 13) in K. Hartley and T. Sandler (eds), Handbook of Defense Economics Volume 1, Handbooks in Economics 12, North-Holland Elsevier, Amsterdam. Wilson-Roberts, G. (ed.) (2000) Australia and New Zealand: The Defence Policy Gulf, CSS Strategic Briefing Paper 4(2), Centre for Strategic Studies, New Zealand. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/69396 |