Complementarity between Bilateral Trade and Financial Integration

Shin, Kwanho and Yang, Doo Yong (2006): Complementarity between Bilateral Trade and Financial Integration.

Abstract

This paper explores the complementarities between bilateral trade in goods and financial assets. By utilizing a gravity model specification with an extended dataset in terms of time span and asset classification as well as alternative instrumental variables, we confirm the existence of positive evidence for complementarities. We find that common factors such as bilateral distance and other economic size variables that determine both cross-border trade and financial flows contribute to complementarity. However, the fact that the estimated coefficients of distance for financial transactions are about half the size of those for trade in goods suggests that physical distance is less important for financial transactions. Furthermore, the significance of distance in explaining bilateral transactions disappears when trade is added as an additional explanatory variable, indicating that distance may not directly influence financial flows. Finally, we also find that there exists another important factor that is responsible for the complementarities that exist between trade and financial integration. This additional factor is a direct causal relationship that acts from both directions between trade in goods and financial transactions, while the directional effects from trade in goods to financial transactions are much stronger.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Trade integration; Financial integration; Gravity model
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration; F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F36 - Financial Aspects of Economic Integration

References

Aizemann, J. and I. Noy, 2004, “Endogenous Financial and Trade Openness: Efficiency and Political Economy Consideration,” mimeo. Aviat, Antoni and Nicolas Coeurdacier, 2006, “The Geography of Trade in Goods and Asset Holdings,” Working Paper PSE. Buch, C., 2002, “Are Banks Different? Evidence from International Data,” International Finance 5(1), 97–114. Buch, C., 2003, “Information and Regulation: What Drives the International Activities of Commercial Banks?” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 35(6). Eichengreen, Barry and Yung Chul Park, 2005, “Why Has There Been Less Financial Integration in Asia than in Europe?” The Ford Foundation. Evenett, S. J. and Keller W, 2002, "On Theories Explaining the Success of the Gravity Equation," Journal of Political Economy, 110(2), 281–316. Feeney, JoAnne, 1994, “Goods and Asset Market Interdependence in a Risky World,” International Economic Review, 35(3), 551–563. Heathcote, J. and F. Perri, 2002, “Financial Autarky and International Business Cycles,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 49, 601–627. Jeon, Jongkyon, Yonghyup Oh and Doo Yong Yang, 2005, “Financial Market Integration in East Asia: Regional or Global?” Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Working Paper. Kim, Soyoung, Sunghyun H. Kim and Yunjong Wang, 2004, Regional Versus Global Risk Sharing in East Asia. Asian Economic Papers, 3(4). Lane Phillip, R, 2000, “International Investment Position: A Cross Sectional Analysis,” Journal of International Money and Finance, 19, 513–534. Lane, Phillip R, and Gian Moria Milesi-Ferretti, “International Investment Patterns,” IMF Working Paper WP/04/134. Kim, Soyoung, Jong-wha Lee and Kwanho Shin, 2005, “Regional and Global Financial Integration in East Asia,” mimeo. Obstfeld, M. and K. Rogoff, 2000, “The Six Major Puzzles in International Macroeconomics: Is There a Common Cause?” NBER Working Paper, 7777. Park, Yung Chul and Kee-Hong Bae, 2002, “Financial Liberalization and Economic Integration in East Asia,” unpublished manuscript, Korea University. Portes, Richard and Helene Rey, 2005, “The Determinants of Cross Border Equity Flows,” Journal of International Economics, 65(2), 269–296, March 2005. Rose, Andrew and Mark Spiegel, 2002, “A Gravity Model of International Lending: Trade, Default and Credit,” CEPR discussion Paper #3539.