State Development Interventions versus Indigenous Resource management institutions: Whose Reality Count? Evidence from Borana Pastoral system of Southern Ethiopia

Belayneh, Demissie (2016): State Development Interventions versus Indigenous Resource management institutions: Whose Reality Count? Evidence from Borana Pastoral system of Southern Ethiopia.

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to explore the extent to which government policies geared towards “transforming” pastoral way of living into sedentary agriculturalists in pastoral communities of southern Ethiopia had eroded social capital, customary institutions, and livelihoods and deteriorated the living conditions of the very people they are intended to benefit and the resources they are meant to manage. While the essence of building on social capital and local indigenous institutions in the management of common property resources is gaining grounds in the recent times, most government policies in pastoral areas of Africa are drawn on the over-riding dominant narrative of the theory of ‘tragedy of commons’. It is argued that important as these explanations could be, they do not fully illuminate the underlying causation of social and ecological calamity, institutional degradation and the erosion of indigenous resource management and conflict resolution mechanisms. Based on extensive literature review on the Borana- a predominantly pastoral community inhabiting the dry lands of Southern Ethiopia and Northern Kenya - this study contends that contrary to the "tragedy of the commons" thesis and other neo-Malthusian explanations, the weakening and disintegration of communal resource management regimes in Borana is a crucial factor behind rangeland degradation, increased livestock mortality and rising vulnerability of pastoralist and agro-pastoralist communities in the Horn of Africa. It attempts to expose how this ill-intentioned government policy have eroded customary resource management, conflict resolution and livelihood resilience practices, and paved the way distrust and non-cooperation; rangeland resource degradation; livelihood vulnerabilities, and perpetuation of conflicts in the area. The conclusion is that while the tragedy of commons narrative has some grain of truth in some contexts, scholars and policy makers should also look into how best common property resources can be managed by capitalizing on social capitals and customary institutions rather than destroying them, as successful management of natural resources require both an understanding of ecosystem processes and of the interactions between people and the ecosystem.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: rangeland; natural resource management; social capital; Borana pastoralists; Ethiopia
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation

References

Adler, Paul S, and Seok-Woo Kwon. 2002. Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review 27: 17-40

Anderson, C. Leigh, Laura Locker, and Rachel Nugent. 2002. Micro credit, Social Capital, and Common Pool Resources. World Development 30: 95-105.

Angassa, A. and Fekadu Beyene 2003. Current Range Conditions in Southern Ethiopia in Relation to Traditional Management Strategies: The Perception of Borana. Tropical Grasslands 37: 53-59

Brewer, Gene A. 2003. Building Social Capital: Civic Attitudes and Behavior of Public Servants. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13: 5-26.

Chatty, D. 2007. Mobile peoples: Pastoralists and Herders at the Beginning of the 21st Century. Reviews in Anthropology 36: 5–26.

Daniere, Amrita, Lois M Takahashi, and Anchana NaRanong. 2002a. Social capital and environmental management: culture, perceptions and action among slum dwellers in Bangkok. in Social Capital and Economic Development: Well-being in Developing Countries, edited by Sunder Ramaswamy. Cheltenham, UK.

Edward, Eglar.2002b. Social capital, networks, and community environments in Bangkok, Thailand. Growth and Change 33: 453-484.

Gebre, A. 2001. Pastoralism Under Pressure: Land Alienation and Pastoral Transformation among the Karrayu of Eastern Ethiopia, 1941 to the present. Maastricht: Shaker Publishing.

Getachew, N. K. 2001. Tradition, Continuity and Socioeconomic Change among the Pastoral Afar in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa: International Books in Association with OSSREA.

Helland, J. 2002. Land Alienation in Borana: Some Land Tenure Issues in Pastoral Context in Ethiopia.in Resource Alienation, Militarization and Development, Case Studies from East African Dry lands. M. Babiker ed. Addis Ababa: Organization of Social Science Research in Eastern and Southern Africa.

Koka, Balaji R, and John E Prescott. 2002. Strategic alliances as social capital: A multidimensional view. Strategic Management Journal 23: 795-816

Pretty, Jules, and Hugh Ward. 2001. Social capital and the environment. World Development 29: 209-227.

Rudd, Murray A. 2000.Live long and prosper: collective action, social capital and social vision. Ecological Economics 34: 131-144.

Sobels, Jonathan, Allan Curtis, and Stewart Lockie. 2001. The role of Landcare group networks in rural Australia: exploring the contribution of social capital. Journal of Rural Studies 17: 265-276.

Swallow,M and Daniel Bromley.1995. Institutions, Governance and Incentives in Common Property Regimes for African Rangelands. Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 6, No. 2. (September, 1995), pp. 99-118.

Walters, William. 2002. Social capital and political sociology: Re-imagining politics? Sociology : the Journal of the British Sociological Association 36: 377-397.

Watson, Elizabeth. 2003. Examining the Potential of Indigenous Institutions for Development: A Perspective from Borana, Ethiopia. Development and Change 34: No 2