Decentralisation and the evolution of Common Law

Ojo, Marianne (2015): Decentralisation and the evolution of Common Law.

Abstract

This paper is aimed at highlighting how common law has evolved over the centuries, namely through the flexibility accorded to judicial precedents, as well as through the evolutionary nature evidenced in the processes and rules applied in statutory interpretation. In addition to illustrating how informational asymmetries can be mitigated through de centralisation, facilitated with courts employing the use of non-legal agents such as expert witnesses - as evidenced in the Daubert case, Pepper v Hart also illustrates how common law has evolved through the scope and permissibility of aids to statutory interpretation. Whilst financial markets and changes in the environment impact legislators, and whilst it is widely accepted that legislation constitutes the supreme form of law, the necessity for judges to introduce a certain level of flexibility will also contribute towards ensuring that legitimate expectations of involved parties are achieved - particularly where the construction of the words within a statute gives rise to considerable ambiguity. By way of reference to landmark rulings in the United States, cases such as Daubert and The Estate of Edgar A. Berg v. Commissioner, this paper also aims to illustrate the vital role increasingly assumed by non-legal actors, and why this approach should constitute a trend to be adopted in European common and civil law jurisdictions. This being the case given the failures and flaws of references to Parliamentary material and whether these should be permitted as an aid to the construction of legislation which is ambiguous or obscure, as illustrated in the case of Pepper v Hart.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: legitimate expectations; certainty; flexibility; judicial precedents; statutory interpretation; allocative efficiency; Pepper v Hart; Daubert; common law; regulatory capture; regulation; The Estate of Edgar A. Berg v. Commissioner
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy; F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization; G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance; L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M4 - Accounting and Auditing

References

Aldashev, G. (2009). Legal Institutions, Political Economy, and Development, 25 Oxford Review of Economic Policy 257

Ayres I. and Braithwaite J., (1992). Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate Oxford University Press 1992

Boettke P. (2010). “Information and Knowledge: Austrian Economics in Search of its Uniqueness” http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1537989

Brudney J, (2010). “The Story of Pepper v Hart: Examining Legislative History Across the Pond” Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper Series No 124 May 6 2010 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1601291

Carlton D and Fischel D,“ The Regulation of Insider Trading” Stanford Law Review Volume 35 No 5 (May 1983) pp 857-895

Cooter, R.D. and Rubinfeld, D.L. (1994) “An Economic Model of Legal Discovery “ The Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 23, No. 1, Economic Analysis of Civil Procedure (Jan., 1994), pp. 435-463 Published by: The University of Chicago Press for The University of Chicago Law School Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/724329

Cooter, R.D. and Rubinfeld, (1989) D. L. "Economic Analysis of Legal Disputes and Their Resolution" (1989) http://works.bepress.com/robert_cooter/30

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc 509 U.S.579 (1993)

DiGabriele, J.A. (2007). To Have and to Hold: An Empirical Investigation of Preferences for Valuation Methods of Closely Held Companies in the Matrimonial Court. Journal of Forensic Accounting. Vol. VIII. No. 1 & 2.

DiGabriele,J.A.(2008).Forensic Accounting and The Marital Life Style Analysis. The Journal of Forensic Accounting. Vol. IX. No. 1.

DiGabriele, J.A. (2009). Gender, Valuation of Private Companies, and State Specific Variables in the Division of Marital Assets. Journal of Legal Economics. Volume 15, Number 2

DiGabriele, J.A. (2009). Matrimonial Business Valuations and the AICPA Statement on Standards for Valuations Services No. 1. American Journal of Family Law. Vol. 23. Issue 2

DiGabriele, J.A. (2011). Evidentiary Reliability, Valuation Standards, and Rules of Thumb. American Journal of Family Law. Volume: 25, Issue: 1, 16-22.

Fon, V. and Parisi, F (2006). Judicial Precedents in Civil Law Systems: A Dynamic Analysis, 26 International Review of Law and Economics 519

Garoupa, N. and Liguerre, C.G. (2011). “The Syndrome of the Efficiency of Common Law” (2011) Boston University Journal of Internal Law, Research Paper No 10 – 23 at page 13 http://papers.ssrn.com/pape.tar?abstract_id=1674170

Gennaioli N and Shleifer A, “The Evolution of Common Law” Journal of Political Economy, 2007, vol. 115, no. 1

Grabosky P and Braithwaite J, Of Manners Gentle: Enforcement Strategies of Australian Business Regulatory Agencies, (1986) Oxford University Press, Melbourne

Guerriero, C. (2009). Democracy, Judicial Attitudes, and Heterogeneity: The Civil versus Common Law Tradition, Cambridge Working-paper 917

Hayek, F.A. (1960). The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Hayek, F.A. (1973_. Law, Legislation and Liberty: Rules and Order, Volume 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hayek, F.A. (1976). Law, Legislation and Liberty: The Mirage of Social Justice, Volume 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hayek, F.A. (1945). “The Use of Knowledge in Society” The American Economic Review, Vol. 35, No. 4. (Sep., 1945), pp. 519-530 http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1809376?uid=3739920&uid=2&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=2 1104299293711

Jha K, “Examining the Current Importance of Pepper v Hart” November 2012 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2149694

La Porta, R. de Silanes F. L and Shleifer, A. (2008). The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins, 46 Journal of Economic Literature 285

Mahoney, P. (2001). The Common Law and Economic Growth: Hayek Might Be Right, 30 Journal of Legal Studies 503

Ojo M, “Co-operative and Competitive Enforced Self-Regulation: The Role of Governments, Private Actors and Banks in Corporate Responsibility http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/27850/1/MPRA_paper_27850.pdf

Parisi, F. 2004 “The Efficiency of the Common Law Hypothesis” The Encyclopedia of Public Choice pp 519-522

Pepper v Hart [1992] 3 WLR 1032, [1993] 1 All ER 42, HL (E)

Posner, R. A. (2013) “Reflections on Judging” Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2013.

Posner, R. A. 2003. “Kelsen versus Hayek: Pragmatism, Economics and Democracy,” in Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Posner, R. A. (2005) "Hayek, Law, and Cognition," 1 New York University Journal of Law and Liberty 147

Posner, R.A. (2001) “Kelsen, Hayek, and the Economic Analysis of Law”

Posner, R. A. (1974) “Theories of Economic Regulation” The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Vol. 5, No. 2. (Autumn, 1974), pp. 335-358 http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0005-8556%28197423%295%3A2%3C335%3ATOER%3E2.0.CO%3B2-A

Rubin, P.H. (1977) “Why is Common law Efficient”? The Journal of Legal Studies Vol. 6, No. 1 (Jan., 1977), pp. 51-63 Published by: The University of Chicago Press for The University of Chicago Law School URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/724189

SEC v Texas Gulf Sulphur Co, 401 F.2d 833 (2d Cir 1968) (en banc), cert denied, 404 U.S 1005 (1971).

Stringham, E. 2001. “Kaldor-Hicks Efficiency and the Problem of Central Planning.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 4 (2)

Styles, SC “The Rule of Parliament: Statutory Interpretation After Pepper v Hart” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies Vol 14 No 1 ( Spring 1994) pp 151-158 Oxford University Press

The Estate of Edgar A. Berg v. Commissioner (T. C. Memo 1991279).

Whitman D. G. , Evolution of the Common Law and the Emergence of Compromise, Journal of Legal Studies, vol. XXIX (June 2000)]

Zywicki TJ and Sanders, AB “Posner, Hayek & the Economic Analysis of Law” Iowa Law Review Volume 93 No 2,pp 559-603 February 2008, George Mason University Law and Economics Research Paper Series