Walsh, Darragh and Malaguzzi Valeri, Laura and Di Cosmo, Valeria (2016): Strategic bidding, wind ownership and regulation in a decentralised electricity market.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_71502.pdf Download (448kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Market power often emerges in wholesale electricity markets. Regulators use several strategies to limit market power: adopting bidding rules, compulsory forward markets and enhancing demand response. We study the case of the Irish Single Electricity Market (SEM), where the market will eliminate strict bidding rules to comply with the European Target Electricity Model. Using the PLEXOS unit-commitment model, we simulate the price that emerges in Cournot competition and find that it is more than 60% higher than in perfect competition. We then study how much the price varies with three measures that influence market power. Limiting thermal generators’ ownership of wind generation does not affect prices. Forcing the largest firm to sell some of its output forward decreases prices, but keeps them well above competitive levels. The most effective measure is an increase in price elasticity of demand, although existing evidence shows that it is hard to achieve. We conclude that regulatory oversight of bids will have to continue, although the Target Model will be associated with limited transparency, creating further challenges.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Strategic bidding, wind ownership and regulation in a decentralised electricity market |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | regulation; oligopoly; wind generation; forward contracts; demand response |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities |
Item ID: | 71502 |
Depositing User: | Laura Malaguzzi Valeri |
Date Deposited: | 22 May 2016 14:52 |
Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2019 15:50 |
References: | Ausubel, L. M. and Cramton, P. (2010). Virtual power plant auctions. Utilities Policy, 18(4):201 – 208. Ben-Moshe, O. and Rubin, O. D. (2015). Does wind energy mitigate market power in deregulated electricity markets? Energy, 85:511 – 521. Borenstein, S. and Bushnell, J. (1999). An empirical analysis of the potential for market power in California’s electricity industry. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 47(3):285–323. Borenstein, S., Bushnell, J., and Knittel, C. (1999). Market power in electricity markets: beyond concentration measures. Energy Journal, 20(4):65–88. Borggrefe, F. and Neuhoff, K. (2011). Balancing and intraday market design: Options for wind integration. Discussion Paper 1162, DIW Berlin. Browne, O., Poletti, S., and Young, D. (2015). How does market power affect the impact of large scale wind investment in ’energy only’ wholesale electricity markets? Energy Policy,87:17 – 27. Bushnell, J. (2007). Oligopoly equilibria in electricity contract markets. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 32(3):225–245. Bushnell, J., Hobbs, B. F., and Wolak, F. A. (2009). When it comes to demand response, is FERC its own worst enemy? The Electricity Journal, 22(8):9 – 18. Creti, A., Pouyet, J., and Sanin, M.-E. (2012). The NOME law: implications for the French electricity market. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 43(2):196–213. de Frutos, M.-A. and Fabra, N. (2012). How to allocate forward contracts: The case of electricity markets. European Economic Review, 56(3):451 – 469. Deane, J., Drayton, G., and O’Gallachoir, B. (2014). The impact of sub-hourly modelling in power systems with significant levels of renewable generation. Applied Energy, 113:152–158. Deane, P., FitzGerald, J., Malaguzzi Valeri, L., Tuohy, A., and Walsh, D. (2015). Irish and British electricity prices: what recent history implies for future prices. Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy, 4(1):97–111. Di Cosmo, V. and Hyland, M. (2013). Carbon tax scenarios and their effects on the Irish energy sector. Energy Policy, 59(0):404 – 414. Di Cosmo, V. and Malaguzzi Valeri, L. (2014). The incentive to invest in thermal plants in the presence of wind generation. Energy Economics, 43:306 – 315. EirGrid and SONI (2011). All-island generation capacity statement 2012-2021. Technical report, EirGrid and SONI. Fan, S. and Hyndman, R. J. (2011). The price elasticity of electricity demand in South Australia. Energy Policy, 39(6):3709 – 3719. Faruqui, A., Sergici, S., Lessem, N., and Mountain, D. (2015). Impact measurement of tariff changes when experimentation is not an option: A case study of Ontario, Canada. Energy Economics, 52, Part A:39 – 48. Federico, G. (2010). The Spanish gas and electricity sector: Regulation, markets and environmental policies. Report of the Public-Private Sector Research Center 5, IESE Business School: Public-Private Sector Research Center. Genc, T. S. (2016). Measuring demand responses to wholesale electricity prices using market power indices. Energy Economics, 56:247 – 260. Gorecki, P. K. (2013). Ensuring compatibility of the All-island electricity system with the Target Model: Fitting a square peg into a round hole? Energy Policy, 52:677 – 688. Green, R. (1999). The electricity contract market in England and Wales. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 47(1):107–124. Joskow, P. (2008). Lessons learned from electricity market liberalization. The Energy Journal, Special Issue:9–42. Lazar, J. (2014). Teaching the “duck” to fly. Technical report, Regulatory Assistance Project(RAP). Liski, M. and Montero, J.-P. (2006). Forward trading and collusion in oligopoly. Journal of Economic Theory, 131(1):212 – 230. Mahenc, P. and Salanié, F. (2004). Softening competition through forward trading. Journal of Economic Theory, 116(2):282 – 293. Malaguzzi Valeri, L. (2009). Welfare and competition effects of electricity interconnection between Ireland and Great Britain. Energy Policy, 37(11):4679 – 4688. Market Monitoring Unit (2009). Single electricity market, public report 2009. Technical Report SEM/09/039, SEM. Murphy, F. and Smeers, Y. (2010). On the impact of forward markets on investments in oligopolistic markets with reference to electricity. Operations Research, 8(3):515–528. O’Connell, N., Pinson, P., Madsen, H., and O’Malley, M. (2014). Benefits and challenges of electrical demand response: A critical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39:686 – 699. Ressner, L., Liski, M., and Montero, J.-P. (2010). Corrigendum to forward trading and collusion in oligopoly [j. econ. theory 131 (1) (2006) 212-230]. Journal of Economic Theory, 145(6):2496 – 2497. Single Electricity Market (2007). The bidding code of practice: a response and decision paper. aip-sem-07-430. Technical Report AIP-SEM-07-430, Single electricity market. Tirole, J. (1988). The Theory of Industrial Organization. MIT Press. Torriti, J., Hassan, M. G., and Leach, M. (2010). Demand response experience in Europe: Policies, programmes and implementation. Energy, 35(4):1575 – 1583. Twomey, P. and Neuhoff, K. (2010). Wind power and market power in competitive markets.Energy Policy, 38(7):3198– 3210. Wolfram, C. (1999). Measuring duopoly power in the British electricity spot market. American Economic Review, 89(4):805–826. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/71502 |