Parada, Jairo (2016): Economia Pluralista para Enfrentar Crisis Contemporanea. Published in: Revista Economia del Caribe , Vol. NA, No. 17 (14 June 2016): pp. 162-185.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_72224.pdf Download (158kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Despite the deep impact of the 2008s Great Recession, Department of Economics around the world keep teaching the neoclassical paradigm as it nothing happened. Economics´ teaching, especially at the undergraduate level, does not leave room for a pluralist background, although somewhat similar process happens at the graduate level. Global dominance of approaches market oriented, based on an individualistic ontology, a methodological deductivism and the massive use of mathematical models since the last three decades, have been closing the possibilities of different approaches. In this essay, possible causes behind this phenomenon are explored, and several proposals are presented about how a more integral and plural Microeconomics could be taught, and a more grounded Macroeconomics involved with today´s problems, and a development theory that does not give up with the theoretical richness of the Latin American traditions, could be also presented to students. The main criteria would be to endow our graduates with a more versatile vision about economic thought and economic theory, aiming toward the opening of new and creative approaches about public policies that would be able to solve our structural problems. Several concrete suggestions are offered regarding curriculums and books, and mechanism to overcome the Procrustean bed that incorporates the teaching of the dominant approach only. At the end, we would have creative professionals and conscious about the myriad of possibilities that a pluralist approach of economics science brings about, and new avenues of creative ideas will be opened to implement such policies. This proposal implies a more audacious curriculum and less timid toward the critique of the dominant cathedral of the main current of thought in Economics.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Economia Pluralista para Enfrentar Crisis Contemporanea |
English Title: | Pluralist Economics to Confront Recent Crisis |
Language: | Spanish |
Keywords: | economic crisis, pluralist economics, economics teaching |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A22 - Undergraduate A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A23 - Graduate |
Item ID: | 72224 |
Depositing User: | Parada |
Date Deposited: | 07 Jul 2016 06:15 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 16:39 |
References: | Británica, Academia (2009). Carta a la Reina. Junio 17 del 2009. Revista de Economia Institucional , 2 (21), 247-251. Dobusch, L., & Kapeller, J. (December de 2009). "Why is Economics not an Evolutionary Science?" New Answers to veblen´s Old Question. Journal of Economic Issues , 867-898. Godley, W., & Lavoie, M. (2007). Monetary Economics. (P. M. Millan, Ed.) New York, NY. Henry, J. (2009). The Illusion of the Epoch: Neoclassical Economics as a Case Study. Studi e Note di Economia , 14 (1), 27-44. Hodgson, G. (2009). The Great Crash of 2008 and the Reform of Economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics (33), 1205-1221. Holt, R. P., & Pressman, S. (2001). A New Guide to Post Keynesian Economics. New York, NY: Routledge. Kapeller, J. (2010). Ciation Metrics: Serious Drawbacks, Perverse Incentives, and Strategic Options for >Heterodox Economics. American Journal of Sociology , 69 (5), 1376-1408. Lavoie, M. (2014). Post Keynesian Economics: New Foundations. Northampton, Mass, US: Edward Elgar Publishing. Lawson, T. (2013). What is this `school`called Neoclassical Economics? Cambridge Journal of Economics , 37, 947-983. Lee, F. S. (1998). Post Keynesian Price Theory. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press. Maya, G. (2014). Crisis Economica La Gran _Recesion del Siglo XXI. Medellin, Antioquia, Colombia: Universidad Nacional de Colombia-Medellin. Minsky, H. (1984). Can "It" happen again? :Essays on Instability and Finance. New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe Inc. Mirowsky, P. (2014). Never Let a Serious Crisis go to Waste. Brooklyn, NY, US: Verso. Parada, J., & Albor, C. (2011). La Mitología del Banco Central Independiente. Revista de Economia Institucional , 13 (24), 465-472. Salazar, B., & Otero, D. (2015). La Revolución de los Nuevos Clásicos: Redes, Influencia, Metodología. Revista de Economia Institucional , 17 (32), 39-69. Siemsen, H. (May de 2015). Methodology and Historiography: Towards a Consistent Empirical Genetic World View. Advances in Historial Studies , 4 , 97-105. Heildelberg, Alemania. Snowdon, B., Vane, H., & Wynarczyk, P. (2001 [1995]). A Modern Guide to Macroeconomics. Northampton, Mass: Edward Elgar Publishing Inc. Veblen, T. (1898). Why is Economics not an Evolutionary Science. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , 12 (4), 373-397. Veblen, T. (2005 [1904]). The theory of Business Enterprise. New York, NY: Cosimo Inc. Wray, L. R. (1998). Understanding Modern Money. The key to Full Employmnet and Price Stability. (E. E. Co., Ed.) Southampton, Mass. Wray, L. R. (2012). Modern Monetary Theory: A Primer on Macroeocnomica for Sovereign Monetary Systems. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/72224 |